Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for durov2 KICK 🤖 Дуров2

Channel

durov2 KICK 🤖 Дуров2

@durov2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

90,036subscribers

+87,500 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003502888073
TypeChannel
Username@durov2
Description🎰 Ссылки тут t.me/CryptoDenisNFT/13 ⭐️ Звезды по 143₽, подарки, TON, eSIM, пополнения зарубежных сервисов за рубли без KYC 👉 @Durov2Stars_bot 🤑 Смотри и зарабатывай: @durov2Kick_bot 🎲 Стримы: kick.com/durov2 👔 Сотрудничество: @durovPD
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/durov2

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,501122,96862,734.57 August 2026 — 2,536 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,758 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,737 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,501 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,166 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42,936 subscribers19 August 2026 — 75,484 subscribers20 August 2026 — 75,623 subscribers21 August 2026 — 80,743 subscribers23 August 2026 — 70,586 subscribers24 August 2026 — 70,035 subscribers25 August 2026 — 66,755 subscribers26 August 2026 — 62,497 subscribers27 August 2026 — 67,662 subscribers28 August 2026 — 72,047 subscribers30 August 2026 — 62,036 subscribers31 August 2026 — 53,440 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,494 subscribers2 September 2026 — 45,826 subscribers3 September 2026 — 46,213 subscribers4 September 2026 — 77,212 subscribers8 September 2026 — 66,325 subscribers11 September 2026 — 55,635 subscribers13 September 2026 — 122,968 subscribers14 September 2026 — 109,370 subscribers16 September 2026 — 109,895 subscribers18 September 2026 — 96,379 subscribers25 September 2026 — 90,036 subscribers90,0367 August 202625 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 49 days, net +87,500. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 02:5890,036-6,343
18 Sept 2026, 16:5896,379-13,516
16 Sept 2026, 06:40109,895+525
14 Sept 2026, 13:18109,370-13,598
13 Sept 2026, 03:16122,968+67,333
11 Sept 2026, 03:0155,635-10,690
8 Sept 2026, 03:2266,325-10,887
4 Sept 2026, 23:5677,212+30,999
3 Sept 2026, 07:4746,213+387
2 Sept 2026, 03:3545,826-668
1 Sept 2026, 01:3846,494-6,946
31 Aug 2026, 03:2753,440-8,596
30 Aug 2026, 03:1362,036-10,011
28 Aug 2026, 23:5872,047+4,385
27 Aug 2026, 22:1567,662+5,165
26 Aug 2026, 23:2662,497-4,258
25 Aug 2026, 23:5366,755-3,280
24 Aug 2026, 23:0470,035-551
23 Aug 2026, 07:3470,586-10,157
21 Aug 2026, 15:4680,743first reading

Engagement

196 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.48%
avg views ÷ 90,036 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
151 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 196 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held196 (11 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total201,126
Reactions total3,878
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 17:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
205
Videos
19
Links
174

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,048 reactions across 196 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,16423.1%
👍1,14522.7%
🔥1,13822.5%
🎉96519.1%
⚡1482.93%
🤝1442.85%
👌1372.71%
😁511.01%
🤣290.574%
👏210.416%
😱170.337%
🤡140.277%
💯130.258%
💩110.218%
🙏80.158%
🤔80.158%
🤮70.139%
❤‍🔥40.079%
🍾40.079%
👀40.079%
11 further kinds160.317%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 196 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,048 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
543
across the posts below
Posts paid on
139
of 196 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @durov2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 196 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC578 views31 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

💎 Telegram Wallet исчезает. Его место займет GRAM Wallet. 🥶 Сегодня объявили о ребрендинге. Теперь это Walt с новым логотипом. Что это значит для пользователей? Как изменится ваш опыт использования? 💳 Вступай @durov2 | 💬 Чат 🎰 Смотри и зарабатывай 😌Деньги за нарезки | 100💵за 1 млн 🪙 Звезды и подарки без KYC 📊 Трейдинг 🤑 Про крипту

👍8❤7⚡6🔥4🤝4👌2

29 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC837 views27 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

На процедурных движениях 🔨

🔥8🤝6❤4👌3⚡2👍2😱2

29 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC880 views36 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Сочи? 😁

👍8👌7🔥6🤝4⚡3❤3💯2🤣2

29 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC549 views33 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🔼 Продана Plush Pepe за $230 000. В январе её цена составляла $158 000. Рост стоимости впечатляет. Но что это значит для рынка? Как думаете, что движет людьми, готовыми платить такие суммы за цифровые активы? 💳 Вступай @durov2 | 💬 Чат 🎰 Смотри и зарабатывай 😌Деньги за нарезки | 100💵за 1 млн 🪙 Звезды и подарки без KYC 📊 Трейдинг 🤑 Про крипту

🤝8❤7👍6🔥5👌4⚡3

28 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC479 views19 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🔥 В GDomains состоялась первая крупная сделка: prem.tg продан за 1 900 GRAM (около 2500$). Рынок .tg-имен переходит от регистраций к реальным торгам. Домен prem.tg нашел нового владельца через прямой оффер на Getgems. 🧾 Покупатель получил NFT-сертификат для запуска собственного проекта. Полная передача прав на домен завершена. Короткие имена в зоне .tg становятся активом для бизнеса. Пока базовые имена доступны, п…

🤝5👌4❤3👍3🔥3⚡1

28 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC477 views34 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

🤑 Коллекция подарков за $1 миллион. @bIackkro собрал 204 подарка на чёрном фоне. Он утверждает, что не продаст их дешевле миллиона долларов. Что это значит для рынка коллекционных предметов? Как вы думаете, действительно ли такие коллекции стоят своих денег? 💳 Вступай @durov2 | 💬 Чат 🎰 Смотри и зарабатывай 😌Деньги за нарезки | 100💵за 1 млн 🪙 Звезды и подарки без KYC 📊 Трейдинг 🤑 Про крипту

⚡14👌6🤝4❤3👍3🔥3🥴1

28 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC513 views26 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

😱 Новая схема скама через QR-код. Скамеры используют Tonkeeper для обмана. Они просят продать гифты или оплатить услугу. Затем говорят, что не хватает копейки на комиссию, и просят её у вас. Вы получаете QR-код, думая, что это обычный перевод. Сканируете его и подтверждаете контракт на выставление ваших подарков на аукцион. Все деньги уходят скамеру. Такая схема уже стоила жертвам около $3 500. Как вы думаете, ст…

👍7🔥6🤝4⚡3❤3👌2😢1

27 Sept 2026, 21:01 UTC≈1,020 views22 reactions3 Starsread 29 September 2026

❗️LIVE: 📱 kick.com/durov2 😱https://w.tv/durov2 СТРИМ НА BC GAME ЗАХОДИ! ПРОМОКОД DUROV💵

👌5🔥5⚡4❤4👍2🤝2

27 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC≈1,180 views22 reactions4 Starsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍5🔥5⚡4👌3🤝3❤2

27 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,030 views30 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🎨 Telegram рассматривает новые улучшения. Команда аниматоров предложила ввести уникальные скины. Это может стать новым стилем для пользователей. Что это значит для вас? Новый способ самовыражения или просто очередная фишка? 💳 Вступай @durov2 | 💬 Чат 🎰 Смотри и зарабатывай 😌Деньги за нарезки | 100💵за 1 млн 🪙 Звезды и подарки без KYC 📊 Трейдинг 🤑 Про крипту

👌9⚡6❤5👍5🔥3🤝2

27 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC694 views32 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

🚨 Схема скама с сессиями от маркетов. Человеку предложили рекламировать сервер Minecraft. Вместе с модами украли сессии Telegram и MRKT. 📉 Жертва сбросила сессии в Telegram, думая, что всё обошлось. Но через день мошенник попросил продать подарки, даже купил один за завышенную цену. 💸 Поверив, человек закинул оставшиеся гифты на MRKT. Они начали продаваться, а деньги уходили на кошелёк скамера. Ущерб составил около…

❤12👌5🔥4🤝4⚡3👍3🤔1

27 Sept 2026, 03:02 UTC≈1,280 views26 reactions4 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

А до этого идиот… 😁

❤5🤝5⚡4👍3🤣3👌2🔥2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @durov2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@durov2 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“durov2 KICK 🤖 Дуров2” (@durov2), 90,036 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/durov2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.