Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kallen

@kallen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,374subscribers

-301 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001647383732
TypeChannel
Username@kallen
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kallen

Growth

23,37423,67523,524.56 August 2026 — 23,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,654 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,634 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,603 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,473 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,432 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,399 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,374 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -301. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,329–23,720 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:4323,374-25
11 Aug 2026, 16:5823,399-33
10 Aug 2026, 15:1723,432-41
9 Aug 2026, 16:2223,473-130
8 Aug 2026, 13:5423,603-31
7 Aug 2026, 15:1123,634-20
6 Aug 2026, 17:5323,654-21
6 Aug 2026, 02:0323,675no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4823,675first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held10 (1 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
36
Videos
20
Links
44

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,424 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 539098162210122327282634.1%
custom 542491268407834853364526.6%
custom 547195298697026716354722.6%
custom 547240469297575382240616.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,424reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
891
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 9 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
158
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kallen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC≈18,800 views209 reactions65 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

From profile to canvas. Some Plush Pepes are not only worn on Telegram profiles. They are painted. Turned into physical art. Kept in the real world. A @Telegram-native collectible, brought onto real canvas. Featured works: Plush Pepe #1 Plush Pepe #212 Plush Pepe #901 Plush Pepe #1056 Plush Pepe #1996 Plush Pepe #2100 Plush Pepe #2133 Plush Pepe #2304 Art by @NagaSeren 💵

custom 547195298697026716394custom 539098162210122327258custom 542491268407834853346custom 547240469297575382211

26 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC≈21,500 views600 reactions127 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😎 The Founder of Telegram has joined the PLUSH PEPE CLUB

custom 5390981622101223272359custom 5424912684078348533130custom 547240469297575382285custom 547195298697026716326

15 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC≈24,300 views262 reactions23 Starsread 12 August 2026

💎 Toncoin → Gram The rebranding is in progress 🔥

custom 5471952986970267163134custom 542491268407834853358custom 539098162210122327257custom 547240469297575382213

Signed Kallen T

12 Jun 2026, 13:51 UTC≈25,400 views253 reactions18 Starsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 5424912684078348533137custom 539098162210122327261custom 547195298697026716342custom 547240469297575382213

Signed Kallen T

11 Jun 2026, 16:18 UTC≈22,900 views313 reactions158 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💎 Found my old Wallet from 2019 on my old MacBook. With test Gram tokens still in it. 💭 I remember those days. Moving test Grams from one account to another. You'd send 1 Gram and receive 20 back. That was just how the test worked. There was even a secondary market in Telegram groups, where people actually traded test Grams between each other. Pure nostalgia... 📖 And now, years later, we're finally coming back to

custom 5471952986970267163162custom 547240469297575382272custom 542491268407834853366custom 539098162210122327213

Signed Kallen T

9 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTC≈15,300 views150 reactions156 Starsread 12 August 2026

📰 Today the official TON account on X published an official post about the rename of the native token from Toncoin (TON) to Gram (GRAM). ❓ The FAQ section answered a question many were asking: do trading pairs need to be recreated, and what happens to historical price data? The answer is no, nothing gets reset. 🔨 Existing trading pairs are simply renamed (e.g. TON/USDT → GRAM/USDT). Order books, trade history, and

custom 539098162210122327258custom 542491268407834853346custom 547195298697026716338custom 54724046929757538228

Signed Kallen T

5 Jun 2026, 13:38 UTC≈17,700 views329 reactions58 Starsread 12 August 2026

We've seen it 📉 many times.. But believers stay. And the believers win. 🏆 #MTONGA 💎

custom 5472404692975753822176custom 542491268407834853376custom 539098162210122327264custom 547195298697026716313

Signed Kallen T

1 Jun 2026, 20:45 UTC≈18,200 views194 reactions144 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 539098162210122327298custom 542491268407834853353custom 547195298697026716337custom 54724046929757538226

Signed Kallen T

1 Jun 2026, 20:39 UTC≈17,100 views114 reactions142 Starsread 9 August 2026

📊 Where did this "fresh chart" idea even come from? If you've been in the market for a while, you'll remember the Matic → POL rebrand. Back in September 2024, Binance listed POL with brand-new trading pairs and a fresh chart. 💎 But here's the catch in our case. The TON → GRAM move is NOT a technical migration like MATIC → POL ⚙️, it's purely a rebrand. The contract reportedly stays the same. 🤔So the real question.

custom 539098162210122327258custom 542491268407834853333custom 547240469297575382222custom 54719529869702671631

Signed Kallen T

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kallen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 251,298 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kallen” (@kallen), 23,374 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kallen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.