Channel photo updated

Channel
Kallen
@kallen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,374subscribers
-301 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001647383732 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kallen |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kallen |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 23,374 | -25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 23,399 | -33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 23,432 | -41 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 23,473 | -130 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 23,603 | -31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 23,634 | -20 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 23,654 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 23,675 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 23,675 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- —
- no view readings in window
- Avg views / post
- —
- no view readings
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (1 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 36
- Videos
- 20
- Links
- 44
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,424 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5390981622101223272 | 826 | 34.1% | |
| custom 5424912684078348533 | 645 | 26.6% | |
| custom 5471952986970267163 | 547 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5472404692975753822 | 406 | 16.7% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,424reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 891
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 9 we hold a reading for · 100%
- Most on one post
- 158
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kallen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
From profile to canvas. Some Plush Pepes are not only worn on Telegram profiles. They are painted. Turned into physical art. Kept in the real world. A @Telegram-native collectible, brought onto real canvas. Featured works: Plush Pepe #1 Plush Pepe #212 Plush Pepe #901 Plush Pepe #1056 Plush Pepe #1996 Plush Pepe #2100 Plush Pepe #2133 Plush Pepe #2304 Art by @NagaSeren 💵
custom 547195298697026716394custom 539098162210122327258custom 542491268407834853346custom 547240469297575382211
😎 The Founder of Telegram has joined the PLUSH PEPE CLUB
custom 5390981622101223272359custom 5424912684078348533130custom 547240469297575382285custom 547195298697026716326
💎 Toncoin → Gram The rebranding is in progress 🔥
custom 5471952986970267163134custom 542491268407834853358custom 539098162210122327257custom 547240469297575382213
Signed Kallen T
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 5424912684078348533137custom 539098162210122327261custom 547195298697026716342custom 547240469297575382213
Signed Kallen T
💎 Found my old Wallet from 2019 on my old MacBook. With test Gram tokens still in it. 💭 I remember those days. Moving test Grams from one account to another. You'd send 1 Gram and receive 20 back. That was just how the test worked. There was even a secondary market in Telegram groups, where people actually traded test Grams between each other. Pure nostalgia... 📖 And now, years later, we're finally coming back to …
custom 5471952986970267163162custom 547240469297575382272custom 542491268407834853366custom 539098162210122327213
Signed Kallen T
📰 Today the official TON account on X published an official post about the rename of the native token from Toncoin (TON) to Gram (GRAM). ❓ The FAQ section answered a question many were asking: do trading pairs need to be recreated, and what happens to historical price data? The answer is no, nothing gets reset. 🔨 Existing trading pairs are simply renamed (e.g. TON/USDT → GRAM/USDT). Order books, trade history, and …
custom 539098162210122327258custom 542491268407834853346custom 547195298697026716338custom 54724046929757538228
Signed Kallen T
We've seen it 📉 many times.. But believers stay. And the believers win. 🏆 #MTONGA 💎
custom 5472404692975753822176custom 542491268407834853376custom 539098162210122327264custom 547195298697026716313
Signed Kallen T
Posted without readable text
custom 539098162210122327298custom 542491268407834853353custom 547195298697026716337custom 54724046929757538226
Signed Kallen T
📊 Where did this "fresh chart" idea even come from? If you've been in the market for a while, you'll remember the Matic → POL rebrand. Back in September 2024, Binance listed POL with brand-new trading pairs and a fresh chart. 💎 But here's the catch in our case. The TON → GRAM move is NOT a technical migration like MATIC → POL ⚙️, it's purely a rebrand. The contract reportedly stays the same. 🤔So the real question.…
custom 539098162210122327258custom 542491268407834853333custom 547240469297575382222custom 54719529869702671631
Signed Kallen T
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kallen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 251,298 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@nomadic_era · 16,3666 postsVenom Capital
@venomcapital · 14,9126 postsCat_Gift
@Giftmrkt10 · 1743 postsGiveways
@Givewaycrypto1 · 593 postsGiveway free
@givewayyyi · 583 postsᑭᗩᑌTIᑎᗩ LᑌDKᗩ
@NukleaR_X · 1163 postsGiFT pop
@GiFTp0p · 152 postsGifts Hunter
@GiftsHunterX · 1,4832 postsInvestment kingyru 💎
@investkingyru · 1,858,5172 postsArchitecton Wallet MEDIA ARC🦄
@architecton_tech · 2,207,9601 postextazy reviews
@bioexta3y · 171 postТигр в Тапках
@cplay2earn · 921 postКРИПТО ЦАРЬ
@czar_invest · 1,0471 postNFTGiftMood
@giftmoodtg · 371 postHA GIFT
@HA_Gift · 9141 postTON Даймонд | 𝗟𝗡𝗖
@lnc_diamond · 1911 postMajor in TON
@majorinton · 2,0781 postmr Farepov | NFT & GIFTS
@mrfarepnft · 461 postTested Garant
@TestedGarant · 141 postWAGMI HUB | News 🗞
@WagmiHub_News · 1,135,1011 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kallen” (@kallen), 23,374 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kallen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.