Докупил рашгард Дурова на split.tg за 105 TON 🎁 Думаю норм, учитывая не самую лучшую цену за тон на данный момент 💎 Кто не успел купить за звезды, тоже советую заглянуть на вторичку 👇 Split.tg MRKT
🔥4

Channel
@agentspotti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002032650162 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agentspotti |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agentspotti |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 66 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 67 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 67 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
95 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 77 | 81.1% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 11.6% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 2.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 14 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @agentspotti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2025 to 14 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Докупил рашгард Дурова на split.tg за 105 TON 🎁 Думаю норм, учитывая не самую лучшую цену за тон на данный момент 💎 Кто не успел купить за звезды, тоже советую заглянуть на вторичку 👇 Split.tg MRKT
🔥4
😬
🔥3
Ждем🎁 Думаю повод всем известен 😏 ⭐ Звезды без KYC тут — @split.tg
🔥1
🎁Ждем завтра новые подарки, поэтому заранее готовим звезды ⭐ Звезды без KYC тут — @split.tg
👍5
Скоро улучшаем стикеры 🔜 Новый API интегрируют в @stiker_bot для минта стикеров на блокчейн 😍 Рынок на @palace сразу дал рост 📈 Потенциал у стикеров явно есть, сам держу десятки стикеров из разных коллекций, так что советую зайти на @palace и взять парочку по выгодной цене 🤑
👍4🔥2
Через час новые гифты 👍
🔥4
Видели новый ивент на portals? Снова появилась возможность получить авторские гифты от Снуп Догга В этот раз билеты раздают по таким критериям: — 1 билет за каждые 10 тон от покупок — 1 билет за каждый депозит гифтов — 2 билета за депозит гифтов от Снуп Догга В прошлый раз с 4 билетов урвал машину за 20 тон и в этом тоже планирую получить пару 😁
🔥4
В своем ТГ канале Дуров написал, что если вас заскамили, вы можете написать напрямую ему в ЛС канала за 5000 звезд (75 баксов). Или же отправить жалобу по адресу @notoscam с хештэгом #blackmail. Наконец-то приняли хоть какие-то меры в борьбе с мошенниками 🤝
🔥5
Интересно как рынок поведет себя сейчас, ведь у всех новых подарков суплай очень большой по отношению к цене закупка На примере сигар, цена которых 5.3 тон, с выпуском 120.000. С учетом того, что они сразу доступны для улучшения, сожжено будет очень мало, значит, торговаться будут в минус Я думаю такой жесткий размах сделан на будущее, где при пампе отдать за гифт с суплаем 100к+ 5 тон будет считаться нормально 🙂 …
🔥10👍2😎2
Прийдется откупать на вторичке через 3 недели, тк все новые гифты уже можно улучшить
🔥5
Бляяяя, был не готов конкретно к этому дропу
🔥5
Вышли подарки!
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @agentspotti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Агент Спотти” (@agentspotti), 66 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agentspotti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.