🎁
custom 53302299582393600814🤡3custom 53998472119892463902

Channel
@gimme_life
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,815subscribers
+214 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002049550504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gimme_life |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gimme_life |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 8,815 | +306 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 8,509 | -43 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 8,552 | -43 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 8,595 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 8,601 | first reading |
44 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 69,065 |
| Reactions total | 853 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
853 reactions across 44 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 280 | 32.8% | |
| 🤡 | 240 | 28.1% | |
| custom 5399847211989246390 | 215 | 25.2% | |
| custom 5296786967755771785 | 57 | 6.68% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 5.28% | |
| custom 5330229958239360081 | 16 | 1.88% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 853reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gimme_life. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁
custom 53302299582393600814🤡3custom 53998472119892463902
@monk запомни у меня 25.10 Если не будет алмазика, то я с тобой больше не дружу!!! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @GimmeVPN😎@gimmeOTC 🎁 Лучший кибербукмекер без верификации CSGOPOSITIVE ❤️
❤7custom 53998472119892463904custom 53302299582393600812
Как себя чувствуют ручки? 🎁 Спустя неделю после улучшений цена на ручки ~ $12.2, при стартовой цене $41.25! Убыток составляет 70% Интересно ради чего Дуров предлагает выкупы кубков на сотни тысяч долларов, когда гои и без него справятся с выкупом? Мог бы лучше сделать выкуп последних минусовых коллекций 🎁🎁🎁🎁 Цены смотрю тут🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @GimmeVPN😎@gimmeOTC 🎁 Лучший кибербукмекер без верификации CSGOPOSITIVE ❤️
❤7custom 53998472119892463904custom 53302299582393600813
У ребят из CSGOPOSITIVE есть прикольная тема, аимки! Зарядил на игрока Niro, у которого 3150 эло, против h1glaiN 3435 эло! Даже интересно будет глянуть👀 Регайтесь и играйте с кайфом: ❤️ Сайт ❤️ ❤️ Mini-App ❤️
custom 53998472119892463907❤3custom 52967869677557717853🤡2
За 6 дней улучшили всего 62% процента ручек!🎁 Уверен, что если бы Telegram сейчас дал возможность сделать рефанд с 15% скидкой, то многие бы его сделали! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @GimmeVPN😎@gimmeOTC 🎁 Лучший кибербукмекер без верификации CSGOPOSITIVE ❤️
custom 529678696775577178513custom 53302299582393600815❤4custom 53998472119892463901
Posted without readable text
custom 52967869677557717856custom 53998472119892463905❤3custom 53302299582393600812
С Believers Fund вчера вывели больше 2 миллионов GRAM!🗿 Примечательно, что произошло это прямо перед др Telegram! Куда пойдут такие деньжищи? ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @GimmeVPN😎@gimmeOTC 🎁 Лучший кибербукмекер без верификации CSGOPOSITIVE ❤️
custom 53998472119892463907❤4👍3custom 52967869677557717851
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52967869677557717856🤡4❤2
Вот вам будущие мероприятия, куда Дуров может еще раздать кубки: Ханой, Вьетнам, 25 сен-5 окт — IOAA (астрономия) Дубай, ОАЭ, 15-20 ноя — ICPC (программирование) Сан Хуан, Пуэрто Рико, 8-10 дек — WRO (робототехника) Думаю на Дубай точно что-то дропнет, поэтому все прогеры заявляйтесь, если Дуров не хочет награждать свое комьюнити, то мы засунем своих шпионов везде😂 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @GimmeVPN😎@gimmeOTC 🎁 Лучший кибербукм…
❤9👍8custom 53998472119892463904🤡1
GIMME x POSITIVE Капец какая олдовая букмекерка для ставок на киберспорт, давно уже знаю ребят, и не мог отказать в сотрудничестве! Если вы делаете ставочки на киберспорт: дотка, ксик, валорант, лол - то это буквально лучшее место, где их можно делать! Договорился для вас на разные плюшки типо промиков и тд! Регайтесь и играйте с кайфом: ❤️ Сайт ❤️ ❤️ Mini-App ❤️
🤡16custom 539984721198924639013❤6custom 52967869677557717855👍1
@monk ты что совсем уебок? Еще 235 кубков ахахахахах ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @GimmeVPN😎@gimmeOTC 🎁
🤡21❤5custom 53998472119892463903👍1
@monk предлагаю снова поменять название нативного токена $GRAM на $SCAM ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @GimmeVPN😎@gimmeOTC 🎁
🤡11❤9custom 53998472119892463904custom 52967869677557717853
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @gimme_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 886,031 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gimme_life named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GIMME LIFE” (@gimme_life), 8,815 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gimme_life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.