Bu grupta altın gümüş nasdaq gibi global ürünlerde işlem yapıyoruz katılmak isteyenler linkten girebilir. Ücretsizdir 🍀 https://t.me/lepublicglobalpiyasalar

Channel
Lepublic
@LePublic00
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,482subscribers
-635 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001483402191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LePublic00 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LePublic00 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 23,482 | -43 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 23,525 | -49 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:18 | 23,574 | -42 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 23,616 | -27 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 23,643 | -73 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 14:34 | 23,716 | -88 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 23,804 | -100 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 23,904 | -97 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 24,001 | -236 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 24,237 | -46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 24,283 | -82 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 24,365 | -85 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 24,450 | +932 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 23,518 | -75 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 23,593 | -42 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 23,635 | -29 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:04 | 23,664 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:08 | 23,695 | -33 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 23,728 | -27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 23,755 | first reading |
Engagement
108 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.6%
- avg views ÷ 23,482 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,080
- 33 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 33
- of 108 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 108 (26 June 2026 – 16 October 2026) |
| Views total | 167,550 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Oct 2026, 12:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Yeni alım için de piyasanın toparlanmasını bekliyorum piyasa düzelirse yeni bir alım yapacağım 🍀
Arkadaşlar, enflasyon verisinin kötü gelmesiyle birlikte piyasalardaki satış baskısı devam ediyor. Son zamanlarda ekonomiyi etkileyen verilerin çoğu beklentileri karşılamıyor. Bu da piyasalardaki satış baskısını artırıyor. Abd seçimi öncesi piyasaların düzelmesi gerekiyordu fakat o da beklediğim etkiyi yaratmadı. Bir süre daha sabretmemiz gerekiyor ne yazık ki🍀
Günaydın herkese
Enflasyon verisi kötü geldiği için düşüş yaşanıyor. 3.7 geldi 3.6 bekleniyordu
ABD Enflasyon Verisinin Önemli 1. Fed’in Faiz Rotasını Çizer: ABD Merkez Bankası (Fed), enflasyon oranını doğrudan faiz kararlarının merkezine koyar. Verinin gidişatı, faiz indirimlerinin hızını ve zamanlamasını belirleyen ana faktördür. 2. Dolar Endeksi (DXY) Üzerinde Doğrudan Etkilidir: Enflasyonun yüksek çıkması Dolar'ın küresel para birimleri karşısında değer kazanmasına, beklentilerin altında kalması ise Dolar…
Piyasa gerçekten çok yorucu. Bir gün iyi, bir gün kötü ama bu sürecin bir avantajı da var Coinler akümüle oluyor. Büyük yatırımcılar dip seviyelerden topluyor, fiyat biraz yükselince satıcılar devreye giriyor ve yeniden düşüş yaşanıyor. Ardından büyük yatırımcılar tekrar toplamaya başlıyor. Açıkçası bu süreç beklediğimden çok daha uzun sürdü ama er ya da geç birikim yapılan coinlerde sert yükselişler göreceğimizi d…
Global tarafta robot kanalım artık aktif dahil olup incelemek isteyenler grubuma girebilir🍀 https://t.me/lepublicglobalpiyasalar
Arkadaşlar, bir coin yükseldiğinde zarardaki koinini satıp yükselmiş coini asla almayın bu şok büyük bir hata olur. Coinlerinizi böldüyseniz sıranın gelmesini bekleyin derim🍀
Altcoinlerin hâlâ çok ucuz olduğunu düşünüyorum ama akümülasyon sürecini ne zaman bitirirler, bunu kestirmek zor. Özellikle minör coinlerin çoğu zaten dip seviyelerde. Bu saatten sonra %20 yükselmiş ya da %20 düşmüş, benim açımdan çok bir şey değiştirmiyor. Asıl mesele yukarı yönlü kırılımın gelmesi. Eğer beklediğimiz hareket başlarsa birçok coinde kısa sürede 5-10X’leri görebileceğimizi düşünüyorum. Tabii bunun ga…
Merhaba arkadaşlar Bitcoin 80.000$ desteğine kadar düştü ve oradan güzel bir tepki aldı. Artık 80K bizim için önemli bir destek. Bu seviyenin altına düşmememiz gerekiyor. Çünkü 80K kırılırsa 60K ihtimali de doğar. O yüzden piyasayı 80K üstünde farklı, altında farklı yorumlarız. Benim açımdan 80K üzerinde kaldığımız sürece her şey yolunda.🍀
Bitcoin de beklediğim gibi hareket etti 80.000$ a geriledi fakat 80k altı riskli bölge. Bu sebepten bir süre izleyip öyle karar vermek lazım yöne
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @LePublic00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Sizce yeni alım yapayım mı?
- Alım yap56%
- Beklemede kal45%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Bitcoin yön beklentiniz nedir?
- Aşağı ⬇️56%
- Yukarı⬆️45%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@kriptomessitg · 53,440#1
@theKriptolik · 16,501#2
@BarisKardes · 7,452#3
@sirgraywolf_trade · 5,248#4
@bitcoin_meraklisi · 15,036#5
@ArtoteFinans · 4,028#6
@evoxanaliz · 8,333#7
@JustTradeGrup · 4,195#8
@magofmemes · 5,624#9
@burak_tamac · 13,945#10
@sjwgem · 2,655#11
@cryptoquant_turkish · 5,244#12
@HoodiesChannel · 5,117#13
@mrtraderkripto · 11,228#14
@crpyomag · 10,448#15
@TraderOmerPublic · 14,137#16
@gorkeutrade · 7,648#17
@cryptomonsterCM · 7,028#18
@JessCoinResmi · 7,128#19
@roninlegion · 2,095#20
@kazancrehberiduyuru · 1,537#21
@yoyowla · 83,838#22
@paradotor_1 · 84,632#23
@eaglesuniontr · 23,523#24
@yoyodexhaber · 39,512#25
@mikabotSinyal · 5,380#26
@cryptotroia · 63,740#27
@uzmancoin · 29,376#28
@eaglesunion · 7,580#29
@AstronomicaNews · 8,338#30
@justpossibilities · 5,657#31
@mikabotChannel · 11,220#32
@evoxwhale · 3,956#33
@paramatik11 · 20,762#34
@TheProjectZone · 1,980#35
@HSNmedya · 37,744#36
@VolumeMachine · 4,144#37
@misstraderanaliz · 13,278#38
@ustadsplinterbilgi · 5,568#39
@selcoin · 27,518#40
@BWEnews_TR · 1,957#41
@coinmuhendisihaber · 39,732#42
@paralognews · 1,748#43
@eaglesunionp2e · 1,317#44
@vucafightclub · 3,783#45
@CryptoMeTugce · 9,507#46
@analizglobal · 4,379#47
@coinotag · 22,015#48
@SYILDIZ2017 · 5,508#49
@islekborsa · 11,693#50
@ChartistsTradee · 3,673#51
@FinansaIozgurlukakademisi · 6,641#52
@Muhabbit · 2,454#53
@numanonatduyuru · 6,951#54
@AirdropMuhendisim · 17,635#55
@BixxiCrypto · 428#56
@alp_isik · 4,708#57
@coinkolik · 8,722#58
@bnaizi · 16,685#59
@firatluxTG · 2,505#60
@turkerbalkarkanali · 2,780#61
@evoxsniper · 2,141#62
@thebull_crypto · 173,588#63
@RuesAnnouncement · 4,204#64
@bpthaber · 347,387#65
@TURKINFORMmedya · 19,319#66
@CoinSonarV2 · 26,553#67
@whale_alert_io · 297,894#68
@WhaleSniper · 59,738#69
@cryptoquant_alert · 70,404#70
@ibrahimhaskologlu · 103,557#71
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,493#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kriptomessitg · 53,440
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@CoinGenzo · 20,730
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
@selcoin · 27,518
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
@HSNmedya · 37,744
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@paradotor_1 · 84,632
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@eaglesuniontr · 23,523
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
@coinmuhendisianaliz · 28,968
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
@iskender07 · 27,780
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
@paramatik11 · 20,762
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 September 2026
@uzmancoin · 29,376
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@AlgoRhytm · 20,703
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 September 2026
@ninjanewstr · 86,236
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
@cryptotroia · 63,740
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
@yoyodexhaber · 39,512
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@yoyowla · 83,838
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@gundem360 · 24,025
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
@binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,365
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lepublic” (@LePublic00), 23,482 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LePublic00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.