Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Burak Tamaç, Ph.D.

Channel

Burak Tamaç, Ph.D.

@burak_tamac

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,813subscribers

-660 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001638204514
TypeChannel
Username@burak_tamac
DescriptionÖnemliyse günde 1-2 analiz/yorum
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/burak_tamac

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,81314,47314,1437 August 2026 — 14,473 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,464 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,457 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,449 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,440 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,430 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,419 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,404 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,393 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,383 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,380 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,371 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,359 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,357 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,347 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,337 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,331 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,323 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,319 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,310 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,301 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,296 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,289 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,281 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,266 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,260 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,244 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,219 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,191 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,178 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,164 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,149 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,133 subscribers25 September 2026 — 14,094 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,044 subscribers8 October 2026 — 14,011 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,987 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,977 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,963 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,952 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,945 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,936 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,925 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,912 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,903 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,896 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,887 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,880 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,873 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,868 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,862 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,854 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,847 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,836 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,827 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,823 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,817 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,813 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -660. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,714–14,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 05:4413,813-4
4 Nov 2026, 03:1513,817-6
3 Nov 2026, 05:2613,823-4
2 Nov 2026, 08:2513,827-9
1 Nov 2026, 10:0513,836-11
31 Oct 2026, 09:5413,847-7
30 Oct 2026, 07:3913,854-8
29 Oct 2026, 04:1913,862-6
28 Oct 2026, 04:2013,868-5
27 Oct 2026, 03:1413,873-7
26 Oct 2026, 05:1513,880-7
25 Oct 2026, 02:2513,887-9
24 Oct 2026, 04:2613,896-7
23 Oct 2026, 02:3613,903-9
22 Oct 2026, 02:4713,912-13
20 Oct 2026, 22:2613,925-11
19 Oct 2026, 21:0413,936-9
17 Oct 2026, 15:5713,945-7
16 Oct 2026, 13:2913,952-11
15 Oct 2026, 11:5613,963first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.5%
avg views ÷ 13,813 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,460
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held40 (11 May 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total27,290
Reactions total371
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,050
Videos
≈3
Links
≈1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,801 reactions across 40 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,07154.5%
👍1,16430.6%
👏2265.95%
🔥1925.05%
🙏751.97%
💯731.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,801 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 12:46 UTC≈2,920 views126 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Tutunuyor 👀 Burası kırılırsa ve kalıcı olursa 2 sene geriye gideriz ⚠️

🔥54👍34🙏19👏10❤9

21 Oct 2026, 14:06 UTC≈5,470 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

"Zincir üstü (On-chain) veriye dayalı analizlerin %90’ı, gerçekleşmiş değer verisine dayanıyor." Peki, RP (Realized Price) verisi nedir? Neden zincir üstü analizin temelidir? https://x.com/Stablex_Turkiye/status/2112892807958434052

👍30❤22

20 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC≈4,820 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🗨️ "BlackRock 2 milyar satıyor ve Bitcoin düşüyor hani bu merkeziyetsizdi... Bu saçma bir mantık!" Odadaki bir fili daha dışarı aldık : ) https://open.spotify.com/episode/3gryVJcgMMf3EE16ZoKh7S?si=60dILUjkRGuxbE87TN3uLw

👍22❤15👏2

14 Oct 2026, 17:01 UTC≈6,370 views58 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

2024 boğası neden farklıydı ve önümüzdeki boğalar neden farklı olacak? https://x.com/Stablex_Turkiye/status/2110369625993347202

👍40❤18

7 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC≈7,710 views96 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Bir pozitif veri daha ama kırılım seviyelerine dikkat 👇 https://stablex.com.tr/kripto-para-dunyasi/blog/teknik-veriye-deger-verenlerin-en-sik-takip-ettigi-2-gosterge

👍62🔥18❤16

5 Oct 2026, 10:52 UTC≈6,410 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://x.com/bogacikabilir/status/2107058178051510695?s=46

❤19👍7👏7

2 Oct 2026, 14:27 UTC≈6,600 views156 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Uptober? Geçen sene de verdiler aynı içi boş coşkuyu. Ekim başında önce arttı. Bir hafta sonrasını herkes hatırlıyordur. Grafik bitcoin'e ait (1-10 Ekim 2025). 10 Ekim'de altcoinlerin çoğu sıfırlanmıştı market maker çekilince. Yani? Uptober, Santa rallisi, vb. saçmalıklar veri ile desteklenmiyor. Bilgisiz yatırımcıları harekete geçirmek için üretilen yalanlar bunlar. Uzak durun! Piyasa yükselecek mi düşecek mi k…

❤90💯32👍19👏12🙏3

2 Oct 2026, 14:04 UTC≈4,800 views57 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍27❤14🔥12👏3💯1

30 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈5,330 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://x.com/Stablex_Turkiye/status/2105300767183622245?s=20

👍34❤8

21 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈7,790 views149 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🟢 %89 ihtimal fiyatlanıyor! Bir önceki 15 ay sürmüştü (yazım 👇) Bu defa daha kısa sürer demiştim 10 ay sürdü. Peki şimdi ben bildim mi? ❌ Hayır! Çünkü neden-sonuç ilişkisi hatalı. Keşke astroloji, yıldızlar falan deseydim. Kesin bilmiştim Şaka bir yana. Peki ne oldu? Haftalık veriden de onay geldi ✅ Yani bitcoin artık yükseliş trendine girdi. Ancak grafikte de gördüğümüz gibi bu piyasa döngüsü ile alakalı. Kısa…

❤110👍39

13 Sept 2026, 13:40 UTC≈7,930 views48 reactionsread 5 November 2026

bu defa altcoin konusunu ele aldık elbette yanlışlarımızdan ders alıp, lafımızı sakınmadan 👇 https://open.spotify.com/episode/5acc2NeUyV8qFWOF3vu1Km?si=XOB8Xc8DTL6bcnS20J7_gw&utm_source=twitter&nd=1&dlsi=80355dd9afa840b4

❤30👍17🔥1

9 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC≈9,470 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Piyasadaki Satış Baskısının Nedeni Ne? https://stablex.com.tr/kripto-para-dunyasi/blog/piyasadaki-satis-baskisinin-nedeni-ne

❤28👍10🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @burak_tamac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HASOsyalmedya
@HSNmedya · 37,516
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Algo Trade - Kıvanç Özbilgiç
@AlgoRhytm · 20,703
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 September 2026
Selcoin Resmi Duyuru Kanalı
@selcoin · 27,244
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
Lepublic
@LePublic00 · 25,490
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Kripto Messi
@kriptomessitg · 53,127
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Yoyodex
@yoyodexhaber · 39,197
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Crypto Genzo
@CoinGenzo · 20,493
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
EU Haber 🦅
@eaglesuniontr · 23,839
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Coin Mühendisi Haber
@coinmuhendisihaber · 39,728
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Coin Mühendisi Analiz 💯
@coinmuhendisianaliz · 28,771
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Ninja News
@ninjanewstr · 85,567
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
uzmancoin
@uzmancoin · 29,153
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
Dtec Announcements
@dtectoken · 20,243
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
İbrahim Haskologlu
@ibrahimhaskologlu · 102,799
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Burak Tamaç, Ph.D.” (@burak_tamac), 13,813 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/burak_tamac.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.