Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -607. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,243–30,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 14:40
29,334
-21
15 Sept 2026, 11:37
29,355
-27
13 Sept 2026, 20:37
29,382
-23
12 Sept 2026, 05:59
29,405
-24
9 Sept 2026, 22:15
29,429
-78
6 Sept 2026, 17:22
29,507
-19
4 Sept 2026, 04:01
29,526
-29
2 Sept 2026, 14:47
29,555
-25
1 Sept 2026, 10:56
29,580
-36
31 Aug 2026, 07:53
29,616
-9
30 Aug 2026, 10:35
29,625
-14
29 Aug 2026, 13:16
29,639
-13
28 Aug 2026, 13:24
29,652
-15
27 Aug 2026, 13:14
29,667
-8
26 Aug 2026, 16:36
29,675
-34
25 Aug 2026, 14:28
29,709
-16
24 Aug 2026, 17:03
29,725
-6
23 Aug 2026, 04:14
29,731
+1
21 Aug 2026, 19:24
29,730
+5
20 Aug 2026, 16:17
29,725
first reading
Engagement
308 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.37%
avg views ÷ 29,334 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
127
of 308 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
308 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
193,821
Reactions total
3,391
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,770
Videos
≈18
Links
≈2,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,803 reactions across 297 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,479
51.1%
👍
1,343
19.7%
🙏
905
13.3%
🔥
335
4.92%
👏
271
3.98%
🐳
257
3.78%
❤🔥
76
1.12%
🥰
20
0.294%
🤩
18
0.265%
✍
13
0.191%
😁
13
0.191%
🤨
11
0.162%
⚡
10
0.147%
🫡
10
0.147%
💯
8
0.118%
🕊
8
0.118%
😘
7
0.103%
🤝
6
0.088%
😱
4
0.059%
😇
3
0.044%
4 further kinds
6
0.088%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 297 of the 308 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 297 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coinmuhendisianaliz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 308 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
$ETH | Günlük Görünüm
Ethereum tarafında fiyat, Bitcoin’e kıyasla daha bullish bir yapı sergiliyor.
Haftalık grafikte son dibi oluşturan tepe seviyenin kırılmasıyla birlikte piyasa yapısı yukarı yönlü değişti ve yükseliş trendi başladı.
Grafikte kırmızı çizgiyle belirttiğim dip seviyelerini Bitcoin temizlerken Ethereum’un bu likiditeyi almadan yeni bir tepe oluşturması, iki varlık arasında SMT uyumsuzluğu meydana …
$BTC | Güncelleme
Hepinize günaydın dostlarım. ☀️
Bitcoin, alıntıladığım dünkü analizde önemli direnç olarak takip ettiğim 4 saatlik FVG içerisindeki likiditeleri temizledikten sonra yaklaşık %2’lik bir geri çekilme yaşadı.
Gün içi trade edenler için oldukça güzel bir fırsattı. Değerlendiren varsa afiyet olsun. 🫂
Hafta sonuna girdiğimiz için geleneksel piyasalar kapalı ve kripto tarafında da hacmin zayıflaması mu…
🕯 Pump.fun (PUMP), günlük grafikte düşen trendini sürdürüyor ama kritik 0,00377$–0,004$ destek bölgesine geldi. Buradan alacağı tepkiyle düşen trendi kırmayı deneyebilir.
💬 Benim için asıl takip edilecek nokta, trendin üzerinde günlük kapanış gelmesi. Bu kırılım gerçekleşirse en azından 0,005$ seviyelerine doğru bir yükseliş beklerim.
🤑 Ripple (XRP), dün paylaştığım 1,41$–1,49$ destek bölgesinden yaklaşık %7 yükseldi. Ben long işlemlerimden kâr aldım, değerlendiren herkesi tebrik ederim. 🤝
💬 Bitcoin henüz direncini kıramadığı için biraz riskimi azaltmayı tercih ediyorum.
🤑 Ethereum (ETH) tarafında dün paylaştığım analizden bu yana pek bir şey değişmedi. 2.717$–2.774$ direnç bölgesi aşılmadığı sürece yükselişlerin biraz hız kesmesini bekliyorum.
💬 Geri çekilme gelirse 2.500$ ara desteğinden tepki alabileceğini düşünüyorum. Şimdilik acelem yok, hâlâ izlemedeyim.
$BTC | Gün İçi Önemli Seviyeler
Dün bahsettiğim ve grafikte turuncu bölgeyle gösterdiğim 4 saatlik FVG, şimdilik direnç olarak çalıştı. Ancak bu bölgeden gelen tepki, fiyatı güçlü şekilde aşağı taşıyıp yeni bir dip oluşturmaya yetmedi.
Fiyat hâlâ bu bölgenin hemen altında akümüle olmaya devam ediyor. Burada takip edebileceğimiz iki ana senaryo var.
İlk senaryoda, turuncu bölge içerisinde siyah çizgiyle gösterdiğim…
🤑 Ripple (XRP), günlük grafikte 1,41$–1,49$ destek bölgesine geldi. Bence piyasada desteğine kadar geri çekilen nadir coinlerden biri. Bu bölgede, desteğin altında stop olacak şekilde bir işlem denemesi yapılabilir.
💬 Ancak destek kaybedilirse 1,27$ seviyesine kadar geri çekilme ihtimali var. Yukarıda ise takip ettiğim ilk direnç 1,63$. Bu seviye kırılırsa 1,83$ hedefi gündeme gelebilir.
🤑 Ethereum (ETH), 2.717$–2.774$ direncinden aldığı ret sonrası düşüşüne devam ediyor. Genel piyasada beklentim yukarı yönlü olduğu için short açmadım ama bu bölgeyi paylaşmam belki long pozisyonlarında kâr almayı düşünenlere fikir vermiştir.
💬 Piyasa genelinde de ciddi bir geri çekilme oldu. ETH 2.500$ seviyelerine gelirse bu ara destekten bir long denemesi yapmayı değerlendirebilirim.
Bu tarz bullish piyasa koşullarında, ana enstrüman olan Bitcoin geri çekilirken yapılabilecek en doğru şeylerden biri, altcoinlerde yüksek zaman dilimindeki güçlü bölgeleri önceden belirlemek ve Bitcoin ile birlikte bu seviyelerin gelmesini beklemektir.
Özellikle HTF üzerinde net destek bölgelerine geri çekilen altcoinler daha temiz fırsatlar verebilir.
Analiz etmemizi istediğiniz altcoinleri yorumlara yazabilirsin…
$BTC.D | Güncel Görünüm
Bitcoin tarafında fiyat sakin hareket ederken ve beklediğimiz bölgelerin gelmesini bekliyorken, altcoinler açısından Bitcoin dominansını takip etmeyi de unutmayalım.
Bitcoin dominansında şu anda takip ettiğim en önemli direnç, grafikte turuncu kutuyla belirttiğim günlük FVG bölgesi.
Bu bölgenin direnç olarak çalışması ve dominansın buradan reddedilmesi hâlinde, grafiğin sol alt kısmında bul…
$BTC | 4H Güncelleme
Bitcoin tarafında beklediğim bölgelere yaklaşmaya başladık. Fiyat, iç yapıdaki geri çekilmelerle birlikte takip ettiğim kritik seviyelere doğru ilerliyor.
Gün içerisinde önemsediğim en önemli direnç, grafikte turuncu kutuyla belirttiğim 4 saatlik FVG bölgesi.
Bu alanın direnç olarak çalışması hâlinde fiyatın yeniden daha düşük seviyelere doğru geri çekilmesini bekleyebilirim.
Buna karşılık FV…
☺️ Hyperliquid (HYPE), saatlik grafikte yükselen trendini sürdürüyor. Bu trendi koruduğu sürece 100$ seviyelerine kadar yükseliş potansiyeli olduğunu düşünüyorum.
💬 Trend bozulursa gözüm 92,15$ desteğinde olacak. Saatlikte güzel bir destek bölgesi, geri çekilme gelirse burada alım fırsatı arayabilirim.
👍18👏8❤6🐳3🔥2🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 308 posts we hold for @coinmuhendisianaliz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@coinmuhendisianaliz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Coin Mühendisi Haber @coinmuhendisihaber · 40,311 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Coin Mühendisi (Duyuru) @Coinmuhendisiduyuru · 26,351 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
MERTER ZORLU ANALİZ @MERTERZORLU · 33,459 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Bitcoin Analizleri @bitcoinanalizleri · 51,982 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
ÖNCÜ KRİPTO @kriptooncu · 50,924 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
COINOTAG @coinotag · 22,349 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
Ninja News @ninjanewstr · 87,490 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
Crypto Genzo @CoinGenzo · 20,634 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
Selcoin Resmi Duyuru Kanalı @selcoin · 27,859 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
uzmancoin @uzmancoin · 29,708 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
Kripto Messi @kriptomessitg · 54,108 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Borsa Patronu @llIlI_borsada1numara_lIl · 63,819 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Crypto Troia @cryptotroia · 64,804 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
Algo Trade - Kıvanç Özbilgiç @AlgoRhytm · 20,823 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 September 2026
Yoyodex @yoyodexhaber · 39,948 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coin Mühendisi Analiz 💯” (@coinmuhendisianaliz), 29,334 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinmuhendisianaliz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.