Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CryptoQuant Türkçe 🇹🇷

Channel

CryptoQuant Türkçe 🇹🇷

@cryptoquant_turkish

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,967subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485552741
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoquant_turkish
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoquant_turkish

Growth

3,9313,9673,9496 August 2026 — 3,950 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,951 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,948 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,944 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,943 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,934 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,931 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,931 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,933 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,967 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,926–3,972 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 13:063,967+34
30 Aug 2026, 15:443,933+2
28 Aug 2026, 01:223,931-1
25 Aug 2026, 06:513,932+1
22 Aug 2026, 11:053,931-3
19 Aug 2026, 08:273,934-9
16 Aug 2026, 15:333,943-1
12 Aug 2026, 20:443,944-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:033,948-3
7 Aug 2026, 04:453,951+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:013,950first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.51%
avg views ÷ 3,967 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (25 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total894
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1938.0%
1224.0%
🙏1122.0%
👌816.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC275 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ethereum Neden Hâlâ Bitcoin’in Gerisinde Kalıyor? @NovaqueResearch | @cryptoquant_turkish “Yılın başındaki kısa süreli hareketliliğin ardından, yakılan toplam ücretler yalnızca 11,9 ETH civarında kaldı. Bu düşük yakma hacmi, ağ temelindeki kullanımın güçlü bir kıtlık hikayesini besleyecek düzeyde işlem ücreti üretmediğini gösteriyor.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

🙏2

4 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC304 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Şu Anda Düşük Değerli Bölgedede @DanCoinInvestor | @cryptoquant_turkish “Döngü açısından bakıldığında, Bitcoin geçmişteki tarihsel dip seviyelerine benzer bir konuma ulaşmış gibi görünüyor.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

👍4

4 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC315 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kaldıraç Azaltma mı, Dağıtım mı, Yoksa Teslimiyet mi? @NovaqueResearch | @cryptoquant_turkish “62k’nın altına düşmesi, artan açık pozisyon hacmi ve pozitif fonlama ile birleştiğinde, yeni bir long pozisyon likidasyon dalgasının gerçekleşme olasılığını artıracaktır.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

👍3🙏2

3 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BTC: Gerçekleşmemiş Zarar, %40’lık Derin Stres Aralığının Altına Geriledi @_Crypto_glass | @cryptoquant_turkish “Değerinin altında kalan arz seviyesi hala yüksek olsa da, son değer derin stres aralığının altında. Bu göstergeye göre henüz teslimiyet düzeyinde bir stres söz konusu değil.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

👌2🙏2

30 Jul 2026, 19:34 UTC600 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Fed faiz oranlarını sabit tutarken, getiri oranları ABD tahvillerinde bir güven krizine işaret ediyor @Darkfost_Coc | @cryptoquant_turkish “Bitcoin gibi bir riskli varlık için, likiditeyi daha da sıkılaştıran bu durum, özellikle de doların aynı anda mekanik olarak güçlendiği bir ortamda, olumlu bir gelişme değildir.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

3👍3🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC588 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Düzeltme Sürecinin Ardında Sessiz Birikim @Woo_Minkyu | @cryptoquant_turkish “Tipik bir pes etme sürecinde, kripto paralar satılmak üzere borsalara akın eder. Oysa bu düzeltme süreci boyunca hakim olan davranış, kendi kontrolünde saklama amaçlı para çekme olmuştur — bu, dağıtım değil, uzun vadeli tutma niyetinin bir işaretidir.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

3👍2🙏2

28 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC437 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin İşlem Hacimleri, 2024 Sonundaki Zirveye Göre %75 Düştü; 2023 Ayı Piyasasından Beri En Düşük Seviyede @Darkfost_Coc | @cryptoquant_turkish “Bu bağlamda, Bitcoin’in yükseliş trendine geri dönmesi, makroekonomik ortamdaki bir değişime ve her şeyden önce talebin yeniden canlanmasına bağlı görünüyor.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

👌32👍2🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC555 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kripto borsaları, geleneksel finans sektörüne (TradFi) doğru ilerliyor. TradFi vadeli kontratlarının hacmi Mayıs ayından bu yana ikiye katlanarak 2 milyar doların üzerine çıktı. Binance, hem kripto hem de TradFi vadeli kontratlarında kripto borsalarının açık pozisyon hacminin yaklaşık %35’ini elinde tutuyor. 👉 Raporun tamamını okuyun.

👌32👍1

25 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC644 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kripto Borsalarını Sessizce Yeniden Şekillendiren Geleneksel Finans Sektörü @Darkfost_Coc | @cryptoquant_turkish “Gate, bu değişimi iyi bir şekilde ortaya koyuyor… Bitcoin’in düşüş piyasasının tam ortasında, kripto yatırımcı tabanının bir kısmını geleneksel finans sektörüne çeken de işte bu tür bir performans.” 👉 Analizin tüm detaylarını okumak ve canlı grafikleri incelemek için tıklayın.

👍42🙏1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @cryptoquant_turkish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HASOsyalmedya
@HSNmedya · 38,269
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Yoyodex
@yoyodexhaber · 40,315
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Coin Mühendisi Haber
@coinmuhendisihaber · 40,594
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Kripto Messi
@kriptomessitg · 54,799
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Ninja News
@ninjanewstr · 88,012
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
CryptoQuant Alert
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,381
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
CryptoQuant
@cryptoquant_official · 55,950
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Toncoin 🇹🇷
@toncoin_tur · 52,709
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
GİZLİ SERVİS
@gizliservis06 · 36,437
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
İbrahim Haskologlu
@ibrahimhaskologlu · 105,274
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoQuant Türkçe 🇹🇷” (@cryptoquant_turkish), 3,967 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoquant_turkish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.