Channel
@ChartistsTradee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,673subscribers
-147 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001489533324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChartistsTradee |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChartistsTradee |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 3,673 | -7 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 3,680 | -11 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 3,691 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:14 | 3,705 | -8 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 3,713 | -18 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 3,731 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 3,740 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 3,748 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 3,759 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 3,763 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 3,773 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 3,777 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 3,784 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 3,790 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 3,798 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 3,809 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 3,815 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 3,820 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 3,820 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Fed üyesi Thomas Barkin’in öne çıkan açıklamaları: 🔸 İş gücü piyasası “zayıf bir dengede” bulunuyor. 🔸 İstihdam artışı sıfır ile sınırlı pozitif seviyeler arasında. 🔸 İş gücü verileri iyimser bir tablo sunmuyor, ancak mevcut durum bu. 🔸 İş piyasasında hem işe alımlar hem de işten çıkarmalar düşük seviyede. 🔸 Son istihdam verileri, iş gücü piyasasındaki zayıf dengeyle uyumlu. 🔸 Şirket kârları oldukça güçlü ve iyi şek…
❤1
🇺🇸ABD borsaları açıldı: Dow Jones: +0,15% S&P 500: +0,27% Nasdaq: +0,71%
🇺🇸 ABD’de faiz beklentileri istihdam verileri sonrası geriledi. Piyasalar Aralık ayına kadar 32 baz puanlık artış fiyatlarken, verilerin ardından bu beklenti 28 baz puana düştü. İstihdamdaki zayıflama, Fed’in daha şahin adımlar atacağı beklentisini bir miktar azaltmış görünüyor.
ABD İşsizlik Oranı %4.1 olarak açıklandı. Beklenti: %4.2 Önceki: %4.2
ABD Tarım Dışı İstihdam (Temmuz) -23K olarak açıklandı. Beklenti:85K Önceki: 57K
🚨ABD Borsaları açıldı Dow Jones: +0.14% S&P 500: +0.15% Nasdaq: -0.29%
🇺🇸 ABD’de 2026 yılı 2. çeyrek öncü verilerine göre iş gücü verimliliği, çeyreklik bazda %1,4 arttı. 📊 Piyasa beklentisi ise %0,6 artış yönündeydi.
ABD İşsizlik Haklarından Yararlanma Başvuruları 199K olarak açıklandı. Beklenti: 203K Önceki: 197K
ABD Hazine Bakanlığı'nın internet sitesinde yayımlanan güncellemeye göre, İran'a yönelik bazı yaptırımlar kaldırıldı.
ABD'li Senatör ve Clarity Act destekçisi Cynthia Lummis: "Kongre'nin tatile girmeden önceki yasama süreci cuma günü sona ermeyebilir. Gündemde Clarity'nin yanı sıra başka tasarılar da bulunuyor. Bu nedenle hafta sonuna kadar çalışılmasını ve Clarity Act'in de oylanmasını bekliyorum."
👍3
🇺🇸ABD borsaları açıldı: Dow Jones: +0,72% S&P 500: +0,67% Nasdaq: +0,38%
ADP verisi beklentinin altında geldi. 📊 Gerçekleşen: 44 bin 🎯 Beklenti: 65 bin Bu, ABD özel sektöründe istihdam artışının beklentilerden daha zayıf olduğunu gösteriyor.
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ChartistsTradee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chartists Ana Grup” (@ChartistsTradee), 3,673 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChartistsTradee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.