Channel
@onsitnov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,192subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001683211641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onsitnov |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onsitnov |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 5,192 | -23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 5,215 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 5,223 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 5,228 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 5,232 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 5,235 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 5,240 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 5,245 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 5,251 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 5,257 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 5,263 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 5,266 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 5,275 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 5,277 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 42.9% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 39.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 17.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В начале года друг сказал: «Илья, у меня 50к на рекламу. Куда лить?» Я ответил: «Никуда. Сначала контент». Он обиделся. А через месяц пришёл: «Ты был прав». Знаете, что случилось? Он попал в одну из четырех ситуаций, когда платный трафик, слив денег, а органика, единственный способ выжить. Я собрал их в карусель. Листайте, узнаете, попадаете ли вы хотя бы в одну. Если да, действуйте по схеме, которую я там дал. С…
🔥6❤2👍2
📌 Темы для контента, который дает бесплатный трафик, не придумывают. Их собирают Если вы сидите над пустым экраном и ждёте идею - вы ищете не там. Всё, о чём стоит писать, вам уже сказали: в личке, в комментариях, в поисковой строке. ✍️ Собрал 7 источников, где темы лежат готовыми, и объяснил, какие из них реально дают трафик. Листайте картинки 👉 💬 Интересно ли вам такое? Напишите в комментариях, какой источник р…
👍5❤1🔥1
🚀 Бесплатный трафик: 6 источников и главная фишка каждого «Нет денег на рекламу - нет клиентов». На самом деле большинство людей приходит из контента, который алгоритм разносит сам. Вопрос только в том, как его подать. 📌 Внутри - 6 источников без бюджета, и к каждому один конкретный приём: как удержать в коротком видео, почему цифра в заголовке карусели заставляет долистывать, как назвать статью, чтобы её нашли чер…
👍4❤1🔥1
🚀 ПОСТЫ-КАРУСЕЛИ, КОТОРЫЕ ДАЮТ ТРАФИК И КЛИЕНТОВ В 2026 ГОДУ Палец останавливается на третьей картинке. 5-10 слайдов и подписка на человека, которого вы впервые видите. Так это работает в 2026 году. И это может работать на вас! Карусели нужны всем. Эксперту, магазину, мастеру, блогеру. Потому что это единственный формат, который читают молча - а значит, без пропуска: в метро, в очереди, на совещании. Звук не нужен…
🔥4❤1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @onsitnov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья Ситнов. За пределами деловых отношений” (@onsitnov), 5,192 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onsitnov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.