Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 25 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @hertzwelle432. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,202–1,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 20:25
1,203
-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:02
1,204
-3
6 Aug 2026, 08:47
1,207
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:50
1,207
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
171.6%
avg views ÷ 1,203 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.202%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
37,160
Reactions total
73
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🎙 „Die größte Angst des Menschen ist der Tod“ — von Witzleben über die innere Revolution❗️
Sieben Fragen, zuerst nur Zahlen — bis eine Frage alles öffnet: Wie sehr wird die nächste große Revolution eine innere sein?
Flavio von Witzleben — sonst selbst der Mann hinter den Fragen — dreht bei Sam's pure 7 den Spieß um. Und setzt genau dort an, wo Kontrolle beginnt: bei der Todesangst. Den Begriff Tod müsse man „einfac…
📞🔥 Neue Episode von Calling Berlin
BEZAHLT SOROS AFD VERBOT??? Juristenskandal mit fragwürdiger Unterschriftenliste
In dieser Ausgabe von Calling Berlin beleuchten Daniel Mantey und Basti Berlin aktuelle politische und gesellschaftliche Kontroversen. Im Mittelpunkt steht eine Unterschriftenliste von Juristen für ein AfD-Verbotsverfahren sowie die Frage nach finanziellen Hintergründen und ausländischer Einflussnahme…
🎙️🔥 Neue Episode von Recht auf Glück
Echte Loyalität
In dieser Folge von 'Recht auf Glück' beleuchtet André Hascher Loyalität als stille Kraft in Beziehungen, Unternehmen und Karrieren. Er unterscheidet echte Loyalität von blinder Gefolgschaft und betont die Bedeutung der Treue zu den eigenen Werten für Vertrauen und Klarheit. Zudem lädt die Episode dazu ein, das eigene Verhältnis von Überzeugung, Gewohnheit und An…
📞🔥 Neue Episode von Calling Berlin
SCHULDENPOLITIKER VERLIEREN GEHALT!!! Argentinien macht es vor!
In dieser Ausgabe von „Calling Berlin“ beleuchten Daniel Mantey und Basti Berlin aktuelle Themen aus Politik, Medien und Gesellschaft. Das Spektrum reicht von Klimawandel und Migration über Überwachungsrisiken der 6G-Technologie bis hin zu Argentiniens Schuldenpolitik. Ein gewohnt kritischer wie unterhaltsamer Wochens…
🎙️🔥 Neue Episode von Confluence
Warum die Natur nicht patentierbar ist – mit Werner Habermeier
In dieser Folge von Confluence spricht Sam mit Aquadea-Gründer Werner Habermeier über die Wirkung von Wirbeltechnologie, negativ ionisiertem Wassernebel und Naturgeometrie. Sie beleuchten, wie der Goldene Schnitt die Lebenskraft des Wassers stärkt, warum dieses Wissen kaum im Mainstream vertreten ist und weshalb die Natur…
🥁 WOCHENBUMMS — die neue Folge ist da!
Pistorius tobt: Befehlsverweigerung beim Bundeswehr-Gelöbnis! Navid Kermanis Rede über Gehorsam und Gewissen ist das Herzstück der Woche — danach herrscht erstmal Stille.
Außerdem bei Sam & Bob:
🏳️🌈 Berlin-Wahnsinn: NGO-Gelder für CSD-Täter — und der „Zug der Liebe“ fällt aus. Chaos oder Ordnung?
🤖 Der große KI-Schwindel: das „neue Orakel der Eliten“ entlarvt — starker Fund …
🎙 „Schlimmer als DDR-Fernsehen" — Krall über die Staatsmedien❗️
10 Milliarden pro Jahr — und trotzdem „an Schamlosigkeit bei ihrer Propaganda mittlerweile gar nicht mehr zu übertreffen".
Dr. Markus Krall rechnet bei Sam's pure 7 mit dem Staatsfunk ab: nicht auf DDR-Niveau abgesunken — „sondern weit darunter".
Sein Fazit über die Talk-Prominenz: „Schon unterhalb von Sudel-Ede."
❓ Übertrieben — oder trifft er einen…
📞🔥 Neue Episode von Calling Berlin
SPANIEN – DIE SCHWIMMENDE INVASION!!!
In der neuen Folge von "Calling Berlin" blicken Daniel Mantey und Basti Berlin auf das aktuelle Weltgeschehen und analysieren unter anderem ein brisantes Urteil zur Nord-Stream-Pipeline sowie die Lage an Spaniens Grenzen. Zudem geben sie praktische Finanztipps zu Rentenpunkten für Kindererziehungszeiten, von denen auch Väter profitieren können…
📞🔥 Neue Episode von Calling Berlin
NACH CSD – BERLIN IST SICHER!!! PräventionsNGO mit 70 Mio Euro
In dieser Ausgabe von Calling Berlin hinterfragen Daniel Mantey und Basti Berlin kritisch die politischen Behauptungen zur Sicherheitslage in der Hauptstadt. Sie beleuchten das Millionengeschäft mit staatlich finanzierten Präventions-NGOs und hinterfragen deren Effektivität. Zudem kritisieren sie die geplante Aktienren…
🎙️🔥 Neue Episode von Recht auf Glück
Hilfe mit Herz
In dieser Folge von Recht auf Glück spricht André Hascher über echte Hilfe, die nicht aus schnellen Ratschlägen, sondern aus Aufmerksamkeit und echter Präsenz besteht. Oft reicht es, einfach da zu sein, zuzuhören und den Schmerz eines anderen zu teilen, anstatt ihn wegzudiskutieren. Hascher zeigt, wie wir mit kleinen Gesten sowie offenem Herzen begleiten können, o…
📞🔥 Neue Episode von Calling Berlin
CSD UND DIE GARTENLAUBE – zu viele Fragen bleiben offen
In dieser Ausgabe von Calling Berlin blicken Daniel Mantey und Basti Berlin kritisch auf die Ereignisse rund um das Berliner CSD-Wochenende sowie einen umstrittenen Polizeieinsatz. Das Podcast-Duo hinterfragt dabei die Reaktionen von Politik und Medien sowie den gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit Sicherheit und Transparenz. Zudem …
🎙️🔥 Neue Episode von Confluence
Wasser mit Gedächtnis – die Studie, die alles verändert – mit Dr. Wolfram Kotte
In dieser Folge des Podcasts Confluence erklärt Dr. Wolfram Kotte, wie strukturiertes, negativ geladenes Wasser die Gesundheit positiv beeinflussen kann. Seine innovative Technologie filtert nicht nur Schadstoffe, sondern löscht auch deren energetische Spuren und reichert das Wasser mit dem vollen Sonnens…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @radio432com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 36,546 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Radio432” (@radio432com), 1,203 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radio432com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.