Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4,633. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112,957–118,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:18
113,652
-98
15 Sept 2026, 20:41
113,750
-122
14 Sept 2026, 01:19
113,872
-89
12 Sept 2026, 05:36
113,961
-95
9 Sept 2026, 23:35
114,056
-190
6 Sept 2026, 15:40
114,246
-179
4 Sept 2026, 02:16
114,425
-263
2 Sept 2026, 14:43
114,688
-105
1 Sept 2026, 13:58
114,793
-318
31 Aug 2026, 12:58
115,111
-335
30 Aug 2026, 11:11
115,446
-116
29 Aug 2026, 11:16
115,562
-120
28 Aug 2026, 14:12
115,682
-178
27 Aug 2026, 11:14
115,860
-122
26 Aug 2026, 14:33
115,982
-260
25 Aug 2026, 11:42
116,242
-434
24 Aug 2026, 11:34
116,676
-1,317
22 Aug 2026, 15:53
117,993
-19
21 Aug 2026, 05:16
118,012
-36
20 Aug 2026, 01:55
118,048
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 113,652 subscribers
Avg views / post
38,200
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
35 (24 June 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
114,600
Reactions total
1,457
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 22:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈645
Videos
≈663
Links
≈1,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 48m
Average length
12m 59s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,054 reactions across 33 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,039
27.9%
👍
3,854
21.3%
🤮
2,909
16.1%
😢
1,053
5.83%
🔥
756
4.19%
🤔
716
3.97%
🙏
530
2.94%
😱
478
2.65%
👎
419
2.32%
💯
408
2.26%
🙈
334
1.85%
🤣
283
1.57%
🤬
243
1.35%
👏
171
0.947%
🏆
114
0.631%
🥴
104
0.576%
😭
96
0.532%
😁
93
0.515%
😡
70
0.388%
🤷♂
40
0.222%
23 further kinds
344
1.91%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,054 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📦 KURZES UPDATE ZUM PYRAMIDEN & CHEMBUSTER AUSVERKAUF ⚡️
Wir arbeiten uns aktuell durch mehrere hundert E-Mails und Bestellungen.
Gerade die Zuordnung der Geräte, Rechnungen und Kontaktdaten läuft teilweise händisch – entsprechend braucht das Ganze etwas Zeit.
Auch die noch offenen Cap-Bestellungen werden natürlich parallel abgearbeitet und versendet. 📦✅
Bitte habt noch ein wenig Geduld – wir arbeiten alles Schri…
✨ LETZTE CHANCE – ES IST SOWEIT ✨
Zum Abschluss gibt es noch einmal eine besondere Gelegenheit, ausgewählte Produkte und Einzelstücke deutlich reduziert zu bekommen.
Mit zum Angebot gehören unter anderem:
🔺 Neutrinocraft/Skalar Pyramiden
• 12 cm Pyramiden
• 16 cm Pyramiden
• Element Feuer 🔥
• Element Erde 🌿
• Element Luft 🌬
⚡️ Neutrinocraft Stationen Groß & Klein
• 2x Großer 1-Rohrer mit Kupferantenne (8kg mit …
🎥 WARUM WETTERADLER WIE ES IST, ENDET. 🔴
Nach 6 Jahren Wetteradler möchte ich noch einmal ganz persönlich Stellung nehmen.
Wie hat alles angefangen? Wie hat sich Wetteradler entwickelt? Und warum ist jetzt der Punkt gekommen, an dem wir dieses Kapitel beenden?
🌦 Wettermanipulation, Chemtrails, Contrails & Co. waren immer nur ein Teil des großen Ganzen.
Denn eigentlich geht es um eine viel grundsätzlichere Frage:
…
🔴 🦅 6 JAHRE WETTERADLER – JETZT ENDET DIESES KAPITEL
Vor ziemlich genau sechs Jahren ist Wetteradler gestartet.
Was damals klein begann, ist über die Jahre zu einer Community mit mehr als 170.000 Menschen über alle Social Media Plattformen geworden.
Es wurde gelesen, geteilt, diskutiert, hinterfragt, gekauft – und vor allem unglaublich viel begleitet.
Auch ich selbst habe mich in diesen Jahren verändert. Meine Si…
🇨🇳Chinesische Automarke BYD - Hinter den Kulissen 🚗🔥
Es ist nicht nur günstige Produktion und gute Technik:
• Milliarden an chinesischen Staatssubventionen
• hohe Verbindlichkeiten gegenüber Zulieferern
• Rückruf von fast 100.000 Fahrzeugen wegen Brandrisiko
• schwere Vorwürfe wegen Arbeitsbedingungen auf einer Baustelle in Brasilien
• massiver Preiskampf, der zunehmend auch Europas Autoindustrie trifft
Der chines…
US-Patent 👉 6.506.148
„Manipulation des Nervensystems durch elektromagnetische Felder von Monitoren“
Erteilt im Jahr 2003.
Es beschreibt die Modulation der Bildschirmhelligkeit um weniger als 2 % – eine Änderung, die so gering ist, dass sie vom menschlichen Auge nicht bewusst wahrgenommen wird.
Das Patent besagt sogar, dass dieses Signal aus der Ferne über das Internet an Ihren Monitor gesendet werden kann, ohne …
📡🧠 Wi-Fi kann zur Beeinflussung von Gehirnströmen genutzt werden – hat Potenzial für hypnotische Effekte und Social Engineering❗️
Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi) ist schädlich aufgrund der Exposition gegenüber Hochfrequenzstrahlung, der pulsmodulierten HF-Übertragung von Daten, der extrem niederfrequenten (ELF) Wirkung auf das Gehirn und des Wi-Fi-Gedächtniseffekts in Körpergeweben.
👉 Eine der schädlichen Auswirkungen vo…
🛸 ET-TECHNOLOGIE VERLEIHT SUPERKRÄFTE: DIE RACHEL-AKTE 👽✨
(Folge 2 / Staffel 30 – Deutsche UT)
Ein 7-jähriges Mädchen löst aus dem Nichts hochkomplexe astrophysikalische Aufgaben und zeichnet fremde Planetensysteme aus dem Gedächtnis... 🧠🌌
Kein Training. Keine Warnung. Einfach so – Geniemodus aktiviert. War Rachel ein Hybridkind oder das Subjekt eines hochgeheimen Experiments?
Der ehemalige Spionageabwehr-Agent Ri…
6G: Das Mobilfunknetz als unsichtbares Überwachungsradar
Die deutsche Bundesregierung und die EU sind im 6G-Fieber und das Ziel steht fest: 6G soll künftig nicht nur Daten übertragen, sondern mithilfe von Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) auch die Umgebung erfassen und überwachen können. Mobilfunkantennen und sogar mobile Endgeräte könnten dadurch wie Radarsysteme funktionieren. Das meint Fahrzeuge erkenne…
📡 6G trifft KI/AI 🔥🤖
👉🏻 Jetzt anhören 🎙
Während viele noch über höhere Datenraten sprechen, arbeiten Forschungseinrichtungen bereits an einer neuen Generation des Mobilfunks, die Kommunikation und Sensorik miteinander verbindet.
💡 Das Ziel:
Funknetze sollen künftig nicht nur Daten übertragen, sondern gleichzeitig ihre Umgebung erfassen. In der Forschung wird bereits untersucht, ob sich über Funk unter bestimmten …
🤮281❤79🔥31🤔14🤬12🙈6👎1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @WetteradlerKanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@WetteradlerKanal edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🚨Glaubst Du die HAARP Anlage in Gakona Alaska manipuliert auf der ganzen Welt das Wetter/Klima?
✅ Ja absolut.67%
❌ Nope, unwahrscheinlich dass eine Anlage sowas kann.4%
🤔 Ich denke es ist technisch möglich, wird aber nicht (mehr) die HAARP Anlage sein.31%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌎 Wetteradler🌤” (@WetteradlerKanal), 113,652 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WetteradlerKanal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.