Channel
@freefishing4me
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001208189035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freefishing4me |
| Description | Ich liebe die Freiheit und suche die Wahrheit WWG1WGA |
| Created | 3 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freefishing4me |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 26 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
RADIOAKTIVITÄTSLÜGE TEIL 1 Ben Williams Presents: "The Nuclear Scare Scam" by GALEN WINSOR (1986) - Ein Beitrag von Galen Winsor Wie gefährlich ist Radioaktivität wirklich? Eine der größten Lügen der Welt! Hier gehts zu TEIL 2 Hier gehts zu TEIL 3 DENKT DRAN - DENKT SELBST 👉🏼FaktenFriedenFreiheit
Signed Kai
‼️Ehemalige Urkunds"beamtin" berichtet - Warum "Beamte" und Richter sich nicht an Recht und Gesetz halten müssen‼️ Schockierend, wie eine ehemalige Justizangestellte über die Machenschaften der Justiz berichtet und dabei Dinge aufzählt, die kaum vorstellbar sind. Der Laie wird das nicht verstehen, sagt Angelika Schmidt (Name geändert). Formvorschriften werden aufgezählt und wie diese umgangen werden sollen. Viele Ge…
Signed Kai
2014 ❗️ FOLGEN 👉🏽 T.ME/WEGGESPRITZT
Signed Kai
Drei Attentäter (inklusive des Sündenbocks), zwei Schützen. https://t.me/oliverjanich/141041
Signed Kai
Dritter Attentäter vor Ort? Dieses Video vertritt die These, dass die Schüsse auf Trump aus einem Fenster in dem dahinter liegenden Gebäude kamen. Damit hätten wir "drei" Attentäter, nur dass der offizielle Täter gar nicht geschossen hätte. Das ist plausibel, weil die ersten drei Schüsse kein Echo hatten und die nächsten fünf schon. Zusätzlich gab es dann den Schützen von dem ich in meinem Video sprach. Audio folgt.…
Signed Kai
Youtube unterdrückt das heutige Video massiv. Rückwärts laufende Aufrufzahlen, wie zuletzt 2020. Sie scheinen nicht allzu viel von der Corona-Aufarbeitung zu halten. Ich würde mich trotzdem über einen Like und Kommentar freuen. Vielen Dank! 👉 https://youtu.be/M0zQ5mjXkNY?si=M8NAylS5fPCJDyML
Signed Kai
💡💡💡 Trumps Attentäter in einer BlackRock-Werbung bei 0:19 Was für ein Zufall! 🤨🤨🤨 ✍️ Jetzt abonnieren auf: Telegram | Substack & Newsletter 🗣 X | GETTR 👈👉 Odysee | Bastyon
Signed Kai
Schaut Euch das linke Foto in groß an, Freunde Rechts neben Trumps Kopf. 🔗 Abonnieren
Signed Kai
Schütze von der Seite. Quelle: TMZ.
Signed Kai
Wow, ist das ein Comedy-Video? Die Chefin des Secret Service ist ja eine linke Frau. Vermutlich hat sie eine Frauenquote durchgesetzt. Beim Secret Service! Alleine das ist schon ein Verbrechen.
Signed Kai
Ian Miles Cheong auf X: „Die völlige Inkompetenz der Damen des Geheimdienstes wird hier offen zur Schau gestellt. Eine der Agentinnen schafft es nicht, ihre Waffe richtig zu verstauen, während eine andere an ihrer Sonnenbrille herumfummelt, um für die Menge cool auszusehen. Einfach erbärmlich.“ #Trump
Signed Kai
Der ehem. US-Marine B. Berletic hat ähnliche Fragen wie andere Sachverständige: „Versagen des Secret Service 1. Die riesige amerikanische Flagge, die über Trumps Kopf wehte, diente als ideale Windflagge, um einem potentiellen Attentäter Windgeschwindigkeit und -richtung anzuzeigen – derartige Anzeigen werden auf ALLEN militärischen/Sicherheits-Schießplätzen verwendet und hätten von den Sicherheitskräften verboten w…
Signed Kai
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @freefishing4me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@freefishing4me named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“free life carp fishing” (@freefishing4me), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freefishing4me.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.