🔵باشگاه نساجی مازندران از فروش کسری طاهری و دانیال ایری 60 میلیارد تومان سود خالص خواهد کرد. ⚽️ @Footballirib3
❤27🖕8👍2

Channel
@F0_TB
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,036,960subscribers
+64,650 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001306634973 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @F0_TB |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/F0_TB |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 1,036,960 | -3,975 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 1,040,935 | -7,670 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,048,605 | +20,719 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 1,027,886 | +77,058 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 950,828 | -8,023 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 958,851 | -6,421 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 965,272 | -7,038 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 972,310 | first reading |
279 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 277 of 279 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 279 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,054,559 |
| Reactions total | 30,851 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 97 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 22of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 7.5 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 14.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 33.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 12,750 views — 1.22% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 14,270).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /13857211 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC | 222 minutes – 52 minutes old | 1,610 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /13857111 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC | 222 minutes – 52 minutes old | 1,580 views ~7 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /13857011 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC | 315 minutes – 80 minutes old | 3,070 views ~13 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,707 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 24 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /13856911 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC | 516 minutes – 2.4 hours old | 6,790 views ~38 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,638 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 39 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /13856811 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC | 617 minutes – 2.9 hours old | 8,350 views ~38 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,209 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,350still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 42 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /13856711 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC | 618 minutes – 3.0 hours old | 7,770 views ~23 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,754 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,770still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 43 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /13856611 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC | 78 minutes – 3.4 hours old | 10,800 views ~140 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,616 interp. → 3.0 hours: 10,600still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 43 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /13856511 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC | 818 minutes – 4.0 hours old | 89,900 views ~251 reactions | 60 minutes: 47,506 interp. → 3.0 hours: 84,700still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 56 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
29,403 reactions across 265 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,680 | 36.3% | |
| 🤣 | 4,694 | 16.0% | |
| 😁 | 3,668 | 12.5% | |
| 🖕 | 3,620 | 12.3% | |
| 👍 | 2,064 | 7.02% | |
| 👎 | 1,005 | 3.42% | |
| 😐 | 952 | 3.24% | |
| 🤬 | 847 | 2.88% | |
| 💔 | 793 | 2.70% | |
| 🔥 | 487 | 1.66% | |
| 😢 | 353 | 1.20% | |
| 🤩 | 123 | 0.418% | |
| 👌 | 64 | 0.218% | |
| 🗿 | 40 | 0.136% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 0.044% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 277 of the 279 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,851reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 279 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔵باشگاه نساجی مازندران از فروش کسری طاهری و دانیال ایری 60 میلیارد تومان سود خالص خواهد کرد. ⚽️ @Footballirib3
❤27🖕8👍2
🇹🇷روملو لوکاکو با قراردادی یک ساله به ارزش ۶ میلیون یورو با بند تمدید برای یک فصل دیگر، از ناپولی راهی فنرباغچه شد. ⚽️ @Footballirib3
🖕14❤8🗿7😢1
💙شماره پیراهن بازیکنان استقلال در فصل جدید؛ ۷ و ۱۰ برای آسانی و جلال ⚽️ @Footballirib3
❤29😁15👎2🖕1
✔️⬜رسمی؛ ضرغام سعداوی مدافع میانی فصل گذشته استقلال تهران به عنوان بازیکنسرباز به ملوان پیوست. ⚽️ @Footballirib3
❤27🤣10😐4👍1🖕1😢1
🚨فابریزیو رومانو: جد اسپنس به اینتر پیوست ⚽️ @Footballirib3
👍17❤2🖕2🗿1
🎙رهبریفرد: پرسپولیس با این روند، قهرمان نمیشود/ در فوتبال ایران هیچ مدیری محاکمه نشده است 🔴 همه انتظار داشتند پرسپولیس امسال تیم متفاوتی باشد و ناکامیهای فصل گذشته را جبران کند اما اخباری که درباره این باشگاه میشنوم برایم نگرانکننده است. پرسپولیس نسبت به بسیاری از تیمهای لیگ برتر هزینه بیشتری انجام میدهد اما با اسامی و رفتاری که از این باشگاه میبینم، بوی قهرمانی به مشام نمیرسد. 🔴 پرسپولیس فصل گذشته یکی از…
🖕52👍35❤11😁6🤬2
🇦🇪زلاتکو دالیچ سرمربی سابق تیم ملی کرواسی با قراردادی ۳ ساله هدایت تیم ملی امارات را بر عهده گرفت! ⚽️ @Footballirib3
😐26❤15🖕4💔2👎1
⚽️⚽️کامنت کریستیانو رونالدو و همدردی با لیونل مسی : "لئو عزیز، در این دوران سخت، من به شما و خانوادهتان صمیمانه تسلیت میگویم. برای شما آرزوی صبر دارم." ⚽️ @Footballirib3
❤236👎3👍2🤩1
🏴 آرسنال به دنبال یک مدافع میانی؛ ⁉️ کونده؟ فعلا خبری نیست! 🔴 به نقل از رومانو؛ فعلاً هیچ مذاکره پیشرفتهای بین آرسنال و بارسلونا برای ژول کونده وجود ندارد. 🔴 آرسنال همچنان به دنبال جذب یک مدافع میانی است و کونده بهدلیل توانایی بازی در دفاع وسط و راست، میتواند گزینه مناسبی باشد. ⚽️ @Footballirib3
😁12❤10👎2
🚨📷⚽️بخشی از پست احساسی لیونل مسی خطاب به پدر مرحومش: نمیدونم بدون تو چطوری باید ادامه بدم؛ تمام زندگی من فوتبال بود و الان واقعاً شک دارم که بتونم خیلی دیگه ادامه بدم یا نه؛ تو از همون اول کنارم بودی؛ تو پدر، دوست و مدیر برنامههای من بودی؛ با اینکه گاهی با هم بحث میکردیم، اما همیشه حق با تو بود؛ خیلی دلم برات تنگ میشه، اما همیشه در تربیت بچههام حضور خواهی داشت؛ ممنون برای همه چیز، دوستت دارم پدر🖤 ⚽️ @Footballi…
❤116💔44👍3🖕1
🖤 ایرج خواجهامیری درگذشت ⚪️استاد حسین خواجهامیری معروف به «ایرج» و از ماندگارترین صداهای تاریخی موسیقی ایران، امروز چهارشنبه ۲۱ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ در ۹۴ سالگی درگذشت. #منهای_ورزش ⚽️ @Footballirib3
😢121❤32💔30🖕1
🚨📊 • پنج باشگاهی که بیشترین درآمد رو از فروش بازیکن تو بازار نقل و انتقالات این فصل داشتن: ⚽️ @Footballirib3
❤16👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 279 posts we hold for @F0_TB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 281,897 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوتبال برتر ࡆ لیگ 360 ࡆ ورزشی” (@F0_TB), 1,036,960 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/F0_TB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.