Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PES 2027 MOBILE

Channel

PES 2027 MOBILE

@PES_M

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

81,040subscribers

+6,816 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001093231175
TypeChannel
Username@PES_M
Description﷽ 🔘 کانال eFootball PES 2027 موبایل ⬇ 🌐 t.me/PES_M 💬 کانال پیس موبایل و ایفوتبال موبایل ⬇ ⚠️ مسئولیت تبلیغات بر عهده ما نیست!
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PES_M

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@PesPars/16643327 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC@PES_M/83411 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC1.0011 days
@PesPars/16779929 Sept 2026, 17:24 UTC@PES_M/83895 · this entry29 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC1.0058 minutes
@PesPars/1680836 Oct 2026, 06:33 UTC@PES_M/84067 · this entry6 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTC1.008.1 hours
@PESFOOT/4834326 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC@PES_M/83411 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC1.0012 days
@PES_M/83432 · this entry8 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC@PESFOOT/484638 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@PESFOOT/4857117 Sept 2026, 06:23 UTC@PES_M/83605 · this entry17 Sept 2026, 06:23 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@PesPars12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutes@PesPars (7–5)
@PESFOOT9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–4)
@eFootball_PESMO8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (8–0)
@pesmobile_news6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 11 of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 282 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

74,22481,24977,736.581,0406 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +6,816. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,170–82,303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 02:5081,040-74
8 Nov 2026, 17:0181,114-59
7 Nov 2026, 07:5981,173-44
6 Nov 2026, 05:2181,217-29
5 Nov 2026, 07:3481,246+31
4 Nov 2026, 09:1681,215-1
3 Nov 2026, 08:4781,216-2
2 Nov 2026, 05:2681,218-31
1 Nov 2026, 05:3881,249+88
31 Oct 2026, 06:0081,161+138
30 Oct 2026, 08:3681,023+92
29 Oct 2026, 09:4880,931+142
28 Oct 2026, 09:4680,789+39
27 Oct 2026, 12:4680,750+92
26 Oct 2026, 11:3680,658+114
25 Oct 2026, 08:4480,544-31
24 Oct 2026, 08:4480,575+137
23 Oct 2026, 10:5680,438+161
22 Oct 2026, 12:4880,277+213
21 Oct 2026, 04:4080,064first reading

Engagement

1,523 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 255 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.91%
avg views ÷ 81,040 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,980
491 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
491
of 1,523 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 490 of 491 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held1,523 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,953,562
Reactions total39,749
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈49,800
Videos
≈2,540
Links
≈31,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 25s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

86,689 reactions across 992 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤32,09537.0%
👍14,96217.3%
👎11,40113.2%
🔥9,97911.5%
🤣7,9619.18%
💔2,3582.72%
🍌2,2982.65%
👏7330.846%
😁6760.78%
🤮5660.653%
🥰5290.61%
😐4780.551%
❤‍🔥4040.466%
🐳2770.32%
👌2510.29%
🤯2370.273%
🌭1800.208%
🎄1690.195%
😭1630.188%
🤷‍♂1530.176%
41 further kinds8190.945%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 995 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86,689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PES_M. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 491 posts held from the last 30 days (1.63%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC985 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

ادیت از هانری ب مناسبت اولین کارتششش

❤18

11 Nov 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,130 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

کانسپت هابو کیف کنید

👍35👎4❤1🥰1

11 Nov 2026, 11:13 UTC≈3,280 views138 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

رسمی فردا همراه هانری مربی وووونگر هم اضافه میشه

❤133👍2👎2👏1

11 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC≈4,020 views156 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

کونامی رسما با این ویدیو اعلام کرد فردا تیری هانری اضافه میششششششه

❤155👎1

10 Nov 2026, 20:13 UTC≈5,280 views178 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

برترین cf ها کدومارو دارید؟؟

🌭129❤26🍌17👍6

10 Nov 2026, 19:13 UTC≈5,320 views167 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

بهتررررین دفاع وسط⁉️

👍126👎37❤4

10 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC≈4,710 views126 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

بهترین در هر اسکیل

🔥114❤10⚡1👍1

10 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC≈4,880 views112 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

آینده😂💥

❤102👎5😁3🍌1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,523 posts we hold for @PES_M. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@PES_M edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 146 posts on @PES_M as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
48

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Oct 2026, 12:13 UTCAnonymous Poll2,030 voters approx.

بالن دور واسه کیه

  1. کیلین40%
  2. لمین29%
  3. کین31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

➲PesPars
@PesPars · 72,135
#1
جزیره فوتبالی
@Island120 · 48,024
#2
eFootball | 2027
@PESFOOT · 68,083
#3
eFootball 2027
@eFootball_PESMO · 54,681
#4
eFootball News
@pesmobile_news · 27,487
#5
PES MOBILE ²⁴ | ᴘ.м™
@pes_mobile · 35,291
#6
eFootball Pes | Mobile
@eFootball_pes · 34,557
#7
Pes Mobile Black
@PesMBlack · 14,482
#8
𝙀𝙛𝙤𝙤𝙩𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙡 | 𝙀𝙥𝙞𝙘
@Efootballepic · 6,020
#9
𝙄𝙉𝙏𝙀𝙍 𝘾𝙐𝙋
@INTERCUPP · 17,278
#10
LORENZO CUP †
@LORENZOCUP · 3,175
#11
𝐂𝐮𝐩 | 𝐅𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐬
@efootball_2027 · 3,639
#12
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 318,342
#13
Pes_infinity™
@pes_infinity · 54,227
#14
MAXRIAN
@MAX_EFHUB · 2,549
#15
⚽ Sport Bad News
@SportBaadNews · 841,953
#16
eFootball Mobile | AdelTekno
@AdelTekno · 71,063
#17
salman__pes
@salman_pes · 2,589
#18
BLACK BAll | 𝗣.𝗠.𝗖™
@Black_balll_pmc · 8,300
#19
𝐄𝐅 𝟒𝟔 MAX
@EF26MAX · 769 (as read 19 August 2026)
#20
PES free
@Pes_Chris · 295
#21
➲ eFootball | 𝗘.𝗙.𝗣™
@eFootballl_PES2021 · 44,054
#22
⚽️ بیست و دو | Bistodo
@bistodo · 401,249
#23
FOOTBALL SOCCER 🏆CUP👑
@footballsoccer2026 · 486
#24
EFZoneIR
@PES_MINI_CUP · 385
#25
𝐏𝐞𝐬 𝐂𝐲𝐫𝐮𝐬
@EFOTBAL_CUP · 506
#26
𝐞𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐌𝐨𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐞
@P_E_SMOBILE · 852
#27
پت و مت
@PAT_VA_MATTT · 654
#28
eFOOTBAll | 𝗣.𝗠.𝗖™
@eFootballl_pmc · 9,637
#29
𝐞𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥 | 𝐌𝐢𝐐
@eFootballMiQ · 2,074
#30
PES TIME
@PES_TIMME · 1,623
#31
𝙈𝙄𝙉𝙄 𝙍𝙀𝙂𝙉𝘼𝙍 𝘾𝙐𝙋
@Mini_Regnar_CUP · 3,123
#32
Sport Bad Tweet
@SportBadTweet · 136,855
#33
PES_MARKO
@PES_MAR · 1,081
#34
eFHUB | 𝗣.𝗠.𝗖™
@eFHUB_PMC · 5,136
#35
EFOOTBALL CUP
@Peslandproo · 122
#36
𝙿𝙴𝚂 𝚃𝚆𝙴𝙴𝚃 ™
@PES_TWEET_ch · 1,520
#37
LIGA PES
@Liga_Pes · 735
#38
𝗣𝗘𝗦 | 𝗧𝗔𝗠𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗗
@EFOOT_PES25 · 1,866
#39
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid C.F
@RealMadridTweet · 204,419
#40
FARDIN F7
@PES_F7 · 2,485 (as read 19 August 2026)
#41
توییت فوتبالی | بیست و دو
@bistodo_tweet · 29,446
#42
IR-EFOOTBALL
@ir_efootball_android · 334
#43
MINI CUP OSTAD
@minicop_ostad · 176
#44
e𝐅00𝐓𝐁𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐋𝐋
@eF00TBALL_Channel · 1,697
#45
PES MOBILE FA | Efootball²⁵
@PESMOBILEFA · 1,303
#46
EF BUG - IRR 🇮🇷
@efBUG_IRR · 686
#47
PES MOBILE 2026
@PES_Mobail_10 · 752
#48
TNT Football
@Tnt_foot · 2,597
#49
⚡️Mahdi Abshahi⚡️
@mahdiabshahi · 64,530
#50
PES PELAS
@PES_PELAS · 365 (as read 19 August 2026)
#51
کریستیانو رونالدو | Ronaldo
@Ronaldo_Cristiano_R · 107,616
#52
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@RealMadridCFz · 272,078
#53
ای فوتبال(efootball) ، PES Mobile
@efootball_tv3 · 61,919
#54
𝙼𝙸𝙽𝙸 𝚇 𝙲𝚄𝙿
@MiniPars · 5,579
#55
EFHUB
@eFootballHub · 7,998
#56
بارسا | بارسلونا | Barca
@Barca_We · 259,966
#57
FutballBadBoys
@FutballBadBoys · 107,771
#58
ورزش سه
@varzesh3 · 1,305,082
#59
𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈 46 𝐂𝐔𝐏
@PSminicup · 4,768
#60
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,733,010
#61
PMN | Cup
@PMNCup · 3,327
#62
𝗔𝗻𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝘂𝗽
@Anis_cup · 204 (as read 19 August 2026)
#63
PROXY_VIP
@PRROXY_VIP · 17,544
#64
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@Realmadrid_we · 274,117
#65
استقلال | Esteghlal
@EsteghlalFc_We · 334,128
#66
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 8,009,981
#67
کانال هواداران بارسلونا ( بارسا )
@BarcelonaFCBw · 239,350
#68
𝒄𝒖𝒑|𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒊02
@EFMOCUP · 235
#69
پروکسی Proxy
@proxy_qavi · 3,249,693
#70
Pers-Plus
@vaarzesh_plus · 20,202
#71
𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥
@drtel · 781,702
#72
Rap King
@rapking · 313,934
#73

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

جزیره فوتبالی
@Island120 · 48,024
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
eFootball Mobile | AdelTekno
@AdelTekno · 71,063
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
ای فوتبال(efootball) ، PES Mobile
@efootball_tv3 · 61,919
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
➲PesPars
@PesPars · 72,135
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
➲ eFootball | 𝗘.𝗙.𝗣™
@eFootballl_PES2021 · 44,054
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
PES MOBILE ²⁴ | ᴘ.м™
@pes_mobile · 35,291
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
eFootball 2027
@eFootball_PESMO · 54,681
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
eFootball | 2027
@PESFOOT · 68,083
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
eFootball News
@pesmobile_news · 27,487
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 September 2026
Pes_infinity™
@pes_infinity · 54,227
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
⚡️Mahdi Abshahi⚡️
@mahdiabshahi · 64,530
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
eFootball Pes | Mobile
@eFootball_pes · 34,557
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 5 September 2026
𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝟒𝟓 | 𝟒𝟓 فوتبال
@FUTBAALL45 · 19,678
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
چیل کنیم بازی کنیم ❤️‍🔥
@chilllandplay · 62,889
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
Football Wallpapers | والپیپر فوتبالی
@Football_Edit_HD · 29,743
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
فان فوتبالی 😂
@FunFoottbali · 37,141
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
GameeRoid | گیمی روید
@GameeRoid · 86,218
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
Cloud VPN
@CloudVPNchannel · 203,600
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
️بت۱۲۰ ایکس
@bet120xa · 28,771
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 30 August 2026
QC MUSIC
@qc_music · 34,107
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026
ALIZELZELE
@alizelzelee · 28,905
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
فوتبال 120 | futbull120
@futbull120 · 27,836
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
کریستیانو رونالدو | Ronaldo
@Ronaldo_Cristiano_R · 107,616
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Alein_music × آلـیــن_مـوزیـک
@alein_music · 53,743
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 77 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PES 2027 MOBILE” (@PES_M), 81,040 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PES_M.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.