Channel
@iran24
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,601subscribers
-405 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001851134435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iran24 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iran24 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 44,601 | -39 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 44,640 | -71 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 44,711 | -102 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 44,813 | -64 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 44,877 | -38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 44,915 | -49 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 44,964 | -32 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 44,996 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 45,006 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 45,006 | first reading |
299 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 194 of 299 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 299 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 105,794 |
| Reactions total | 523 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
512 reactions across 182 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 108 | 21.1% | |
| ❤ | 102 | 19.9% | |
| 😁 | 95 | 18.6% | |
| 😡 | 47 | 9.18% | |
| 😢 | 39 | 7.62% | |
| 👎 | 31 | 6.05% | |
| 🍌 | 28 | 5.47% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 4.30% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 3.13% | |
| 🤗 | 9 | 1.76% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.781% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.391% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.391% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.391% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.195% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.195% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.195% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.195% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.195% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 194 of the 299 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 523reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 299 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
عراقچی: آمریکا در قبال تنگهٔ هرمز، مرتکب اشتباه محاسباتی بزرگی شده است 🔺آمریکا مدتهاست که به دلیل ضعف اطلاعاتی، دچار اشتباهات محاسباتی مکرر میشود. جنگ علیه ایران نمونهای روشن از آن است. اکنون نیز در قبال تنگهٔ هرمز، مرتکب اشتباه محاسباتی حتی بزرگتری شده است. 🔺بدتر از اخبار جعلی، اطلاعات جعلی است. مراقب باشید. 🔺الله بزرگ است، بزرگتر از هر قدرتی بر روی زمین. ما بر الله توکل داریم. @iran24
تازهترین تصاویر از آلودگی نفتی در سواحل جنوبی قشم @iran24
عراقچی: کشورهایی مانند فرانسه باید از موعظهکردن جهانیان دربارهٔ «حقوق بشر» و قوانین بینالمللی دست بردارند 🔺این کار یک ریاکاری آشکار و شرمآور است. 🔺حمایت شما از نسلکشی اسرائیل در غزه و حملات تجاوزکارانه به ایران، هرگونه برتری اخلاقی را که تصور میکردید دارید، از بین برده است. @iran24
استادیوم آزادی تا پایان آذر آماده میشود بهمنی، سخنگوی سازمان لیگ: 🔺مسابقاتی که قرار بود در هفته اول و سوم در استادیوم غدیر اهواز برگزار شود، در استادیوم دستگردی تهران برگزار خواهد شد. @iran24
مدودف: عملیات نظامی در اوکراین طبق شروط ما پایان مییابد معاون رئیس شورای امنیت روسیه: 🔺دشمن در حال جنگ با شهروندان عادی روسیه است. 🔺عملیات ویژه نظامی در اوکراین دیر یا زود «طبق شرایط ما» پایان خواهد یافت. 🔺تحریمهای اعمال شده علیه روسیه فرصتهای جدیدی را برای شرکتهای داخلی که با آنها سازگار شدهاند، ایجاد کرده است. @iran24
تاریکی تاراگونا اسپانیا در لحظهٔ خورشیدگرفتگی کامل @iran24
شبکه اجتماعی ایکس، صفحه سخنگوی ارتش یمن یحیی سریع را بست @iran24
طغیان آتشفشان در جزیره سیسیل 🔺برای هفتمین روز متوالی، فوران کوه آتشفشان اتنا، عملیات فرودگاه اصلی سیسیل، کاتانیا- فونتاناروسا را فلج کرده است. 🔸باند فرودگاه به دلیل ابرهای خاکستر آتشفشانی و بادهای شدید دوباره بسته شد. @iran24
وزارت دفاع روسیه: پدافند هوایی ما شب گذشته ۳۶۲ پهپاد اوکراینی را بر فراز مناطق مختلف این کشور سرنگون کرد @iran24
مهار آتشسوزی پارک ملی بوجاق کیاشهر آستانه اشرفیه مدیرکل مدیریت بحران استانداری گیلان: 🔺۲ هکتار از پارک ملی بوجاق کیاشهر در آتش سوخت. 🔺عامل انسانی دلیل این حادثه بوده است. @iran24
الزیدی: اجازه نمیدهیم از خاک و آسمان عراق علیه همسایگان استفاده شود نخستوزیر عراق: 🔺عراق اجازه نخواهد داد از خاک یا حریم هوایی این کشور برای انجام هرگونه حمله علیه کشورهای همسایه استفاده شود. 🔸نخستوزیر عراق بامداد امروز از مرکز عملیات فرماندهی پدافند هوایی این کشور بازدید کرد. @iran24
رویترز: تهدید موشکی واقعی منجر به تغییر مخفیانه هواپیمای ترامپ شد رویترز به نقل از یک منبع آگاه: 🔺تهدید به هدف قرار دادن هواپیمای رئیس جمهور با موشک، سرویس مخفی را بر آن داشت تا ترامپ، رئیس جمهور آمریکا را در سفر ماه گذشته به ترکیه مخفیانه به یک هواپیمای دولتی بدون علامت منتقل کند. @iran24
❤1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 299 posts we hold for @iran24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@iran24 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 40,611 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایران ۲۴” (@iran24), 44,601 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iran24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.