Channel
@DiscriminationTelegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
56subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001999992955 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DiscriminationTelegram |
| Description | By @WomenRightsTelegram @DefenceTelegram @MeteoTelegram @AnimalFreaks @GenRevolutionOfficial @ClimateChangeTelegram More @ScienceFactsChannels @FactsTelegramChannels @LawsTelegram @HumanRightsChannels @HumanRightsChecklist @NoBreivikMania etc. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 23 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DiscriminationTelegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 56 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 56 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Exactly like this should our world work! When 🇪🇸 meets 🥶 but made in 🇷🇴, exactly like all our projects! We are just one nation! Because for us there is not just 🇳🇱, 🇳🇴, 🇫🇮 or🇨🇭but 🇳🇴🇳🇱🇫🇮🇬🇱🇨🇭🇮🇸🇸🇪🇧🇪🇪🇸🇮🇹🇩🇪🇫🇷🇦🇷🇨🇦🇧🇷🇵🇪🇨🇱🇩🇰🇵🇹🇦🇹🇱🇮🇱🇺🇧🇴🇨🇴🇬🇧🇺🇦🇪🇨🇵🇹🇵🇭🇵🇦🇲🇽🇬🇫🇮🇱🇦🇶🇱🇻🇬🇾🇮🇩🇵🇾🇪🇪🇸🇷🇵🇸🇳🇿🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇾🇻🇪🇨🇺🇦🇺🇨🇿🇨🇷🇩🇴 etc! 🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx 🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx 🖇🌍 https://t.me/addlist/PnM6poGtTtwwMzcx
Like said previously: NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POLITICIANS / INFLUENCERS / JUDGES / LAWYERS / GOVERNMENT PEOPLE / CEOS and normal people! https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/255 It's time to put in prison such people properly once at all! https://t.me/IgnoringCrimes/36 https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7 https://t.me/GovernmentCrimes One thing is sure: WE GIVE A SHIT IF SUCH DUDES ARE FAMOUS OR GET BIO OF WAGE! They are exactly …
Yes and NO! DO WE WANT TO CONSIDER HOW MANY TIMES PEOPLE TOUCH OTHER PEOPLE WITHOUT PERMISSION TOO??! So again ... let we don't promote this bullshit that THIS HAPPENS JUST WITH WOMEN! because touching happens to everyone! Even just a 🫲 on your shoulder IS NOT OK! https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/73 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/75 Second, GIRLS SAYING YOU TOUCHED THEM, when this is fucking a bullsh…
No discrimination means no discrimination by: - 💶 Financial aspects - 🐳👡 Size - 💄Body Image - 🌍 Languages - 🐫 Religious aspects - 👔 Type of Jobs - 🎅 Age - 🌈 Mental aspects / body feeling - 🦠 Diseases - 🇷🇺 Countries - 🎨 Abilities - 🖤 Body colors - 🐒 Personal decisions on how to live the life (if this is not against main rules, like killing people, etc.), means if you prefer to live alone, in group, have or not kids, …
The topic "Rape and Trans" is exactly the same! - Trans women (= Men —> Women) are fighting to compete in women sport, but WE FORGET WOMEN RIGHTS! that should be respected too. - Death sentence: we always talk about morders and drug traffickers BUT WE FORGET RAPERS, CANNIBALISTS, TERRORISTS, PEDOPHILES, ETC.! - We talk about dignity of living BUT WE FORGET THE DIGNITY OF DYING - We talk about some crimes in Ukrai…
More job respect Part 1 Conclusion? We say YES to Begrenzungsinitiative! It's time that jobs get more respect! It's time to limit the amount of people from other countries, if this have bad consequences to our country! No matter if done with legal migration or illegal migration. Illegal migration IS A NO GO! https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40 https://t.me/EthicalDile…
This video is the best example because it summarizes so many things! a) like said before WE DON'T AGREE with such death penalty https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/223 but remember we don't know the whole story ... no matter our first impression is "@ShittyDeathSentences"! and many other have the same opinion too: "Why does he die after killing one person when people really sitting in prison for life for killing 10?…
Don't discriminate people just because they were born in the same country! or because some of them behave badly!
People still have not understand that. Hamas is not Palestine https://t.me/IsraelWarBullshit/352 https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/194 https://t.me/IsraelWarRights/374 https://t.me/IsraelWarRights/359 https://t.me/IsraelWarRights/355 Backup by @TerrorismTelegram A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Asia / Arabia, are the home of terrorisms https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/142 but even the region with most CO2 pollution https://t.me/IsraelWarBullshit/58 and missing human / animal rights https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/352 https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/9 https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/514 Does this mean we can now classify every arabian etc. as terrorist? NOPE, this is fully wrong, like saying that all 🇵🇸 are de…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @DiscriminationTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 81,680 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 54 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DiscriminationTelegram named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“It's time to stop to discriminate people by age, type of job, language / country / religion, skin colour, size, social status” (@DiscriminationTelegram), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DiscriminationTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.