Channel
@LawsTelegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002056640545 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LawsTelegram |
| Description | DOESN'T WORK? @ArghTelegram - A project by @WomenRightsTelegram @GenRevolutionOfficial @AnimalFreaks @RoadToPetabyte @NatureFreaksDeutsch @ClimateChangeTelegram @MeteoTelegram @FactsTelegramChannels @FactsTelegramFreaks @HumanRightsChannels |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 28 February 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LawsTelegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 182 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 182 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 28 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Trump, which is not a perfect politicians at all! (and we don't support at all, even if there are positive points too, like in all people), already said that! https://t.me/GovernmentCrimes/26 and we agree with that at whole! Our governments are killers and WILL REMAIN KILLERS, UNTIL THEY REALLY WILL CHANGE! and this picture contains some of the crimes our governments are doing, even if they are doing much more! We…
Few things our planet need to do are: a) remove difference between under and over 18 people! SAME SENTENCE FOR RAPE, NO MATTER THE AGE! https://t.me/RapeDeathPenalty/22 https://t.me/RecidivismFacts/166 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/73 So no matter if a 15 rape a 15 or a 15 rape a 14 or a 18 rape a 20 or whatever! 🙅♂️ Bolivia 💩 https://t.me/RapeTelegram/198 RAPE IS RAPE! and suicide / trauma / other ...…
Elderly / death people NEED MORE RESPECT, exactly like students https://t.me/StudentRightsTelegram/123 https://t.me/StudentRightsTelegram/128 & more! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/97 https://t.me/BlackHumanRights https://t.me/JobDiscrimination https://t.me/JobsFacts https://t.me/EuropeFacts/37 https://t.me/EuropeFacts/41 etc. First, we already talked about 13 AHV https://t.me/LawsTelegram/154 https://t.me/FinanceFactsT…
What do we always say? RELIGION IS A BRAINWASH! This is showed by science and religion is against science! Let we check the topic abortion ... What can we see? Italy is huge low, Netherlands is huge high! This is why in Italy there are 💩 laws (or laws are not respected), in Netherlands better laws related to suicide / abortion! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/43 https://t.me/WeAreTheFutureTelegram/7 vs. 🇮🇹 https://t.me/S…
This is exactly why ALL SOCIALS NEED TO IMPLEMENT AN ID VERIFICATION! https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1365 EVERYONE! So yes, even we, that we own probably K of social accounts NEED TO SUBMIT OVER 10000 ID! and we would be ready to do that, if they don't ban us, because of too many accounts (private and public) ... Which is bullshit, because we have a specific goal of having so many accounts! NO PRIVACY FOR CRIMINALS! …
And about that " = less view = less money " we talk to less ... When the reality is that WE DON'T TALK AT ALL ABOUT PEOPLE DOING SUICIDES! which is a shame. Because if people do suicides, we need to understand the reason and fight against that! Remember, suicides are even the consequences of crimes ... Let we don't forget Today, suicide or attempted suicide does not constitute a crime according to Swedish law. SO…
HANAU, A FAILURE LIKE BREIVIK TERROR ATTACK BY NORVEGIANS! Part 4 Part 1 https://t.me/HanauBreivik/40 "we never imagined that", "if we invested money before the attack" and similar bullshit a) we already answered that https://t.me/HanauBreivik/32 b) "i never imagined a terror attack can happen in Israel / at a festival" https://t.me/TravelAdviceTelegram/19 https://t.me/TravelAdviceTelegram/4 https://t.me/TravelAd…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @LawsTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 3,252 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 160 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“To do checklist to improve our laws to keep population safe and secure from criminals / rapers / abuses” (@LawsTelegram), 182 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LawsTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.