Channel
@WomenRightsTelegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
339subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001984926106 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WomenRightsTelegram |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WomenRightsTelegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 339 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 330 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 330 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
If you are reading this scheduled message, means we are now representing Telegram in paradise, but still here too. We will share a message we wrote almost 1 year ago, that we never changed in the last time. We released tons of updated messages to our family. It's their decision if they want to share worldwide such messages or not. Our new update are our channels! No matter what, we will continue to fight for facts, …
It's time to be a better world! Backup by @WomenRightsTelegram A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Dear Future Generations, WE ARE SORRY! https://t.me/WorldWar3Facts/26 https://t.me/WeAreTheFutureTelegram/6 🖇🌍 https://t.me/addlist/PnM6poGtTtwwMzcx Backup by @WomenRightsTelegram A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Learn with Norway : what we need to learn for a bad day happened in Norge to live with more security / rights / equality https://t.me/LearnWithNorway Backup by @WomenRightsTelegram A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Mission 🌍 worldwide revolution is starting to reach 100% after months / years of hard work to archive such goal - Now is time to go to the next level. You can be part of this mission too! by don't keep eyes closed! Not just about climate change! but EVERYTHING! https://t.me/MissionPlaneta https://t.me/ClimateToDo 🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx 🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx 🖇🛡 https://t.me/…
Let we go back to crimes we support and our laws / politicians or whatever need to have much more respect on that https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/255 Like said previously, we disagree at all with people doing correlations! using bullshit stats / manipulated / 10% of the informations or whatever! https://t.me/CrimeExamples/140 https://t.me/StandForScience Now, let we check which crimes we need to respect more! Fi…
Silvia and human rights in Italy! Let we make a small refresh! https://t.me/SilviaSardoneTelegram/25 by excluding now the topic climate change / Islam discrimination and other bullshit ... a) Italy laws are shit! and need to be improved b) Italy law related to abortion, euthanasia and similar things is a disaster! but yes ... come to Switzerland when you need that! by remembering that even in Switzerland such law…
WomenRightsTelegram doesn't stand for ignorance / religion bullshit and bullshit activists Part 4 So like said in part 1 https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/1173 we don't support religion crimes! but with support religion freedom! In part 2 https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/1174 we talked about bullshit activists and that laws need to be respected for serious crimes done by them. Like we stand for no discrimination. I…
WomenRightsTelegram doesn't stand for ignorance / religion bullshit and bullshit activists Part 3 So like said in part 1 https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/1173 we don't support religion crimes! but with support religion freedom! In Part 2 https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/1174 we talked about bullshit activists and that laws need to be respected for serious crimes done by them. Like we stand for no discrimination. L…
WomenRightsTelegram doesn't stand for ignorance / religion bullshit and bullshit activists Part 2 So like said in part 1 https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/1173 we don't support religion crimes! but with support religion freedom! We for sure don't support discrimination! and Breivik! https://t.me/DiscriminationTelegram https://t.me/NoBreivikMania https://t.me/JobDiscrimination https://t.me/JobsFacts https://t.me/Blac…
WomenRightsTelegram doesn't stand for ignorance / religion bullshit and bullshit activists Part 1 We always said that freedom of religion is all ok, if this freedom is not source of crimes! So everyone can follow any type of religion! what we for sure don't support are: - that parents IMPOSE kids which religion they need to follow! This is definitely a crime! Since no one can be forced to follow what you follow! Y…
For sure WE ARE NOT like all other corrupted organisations that fight for the shit they want! mostly - innocent prisoners (a) - criminals (b) - illegal migrants (c) - LGBT (d) - women rights (e) and similar things https://t.me/AmnestyShit https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/1152 All things we are doing too, even if this is not our main focus! because the world is already BOMBARDED with such topics! by forgettin…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @WomenRightsTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 22,753 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 85 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WomenRightsTelegram named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Women Rights / 🌈 LGBT / Lesbians / Gays / Transsexual on Telegram by GRT” (@WomenRightsTelegram), 339 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WomenRightsTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.