Channel
@CannibalTelegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
94subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002013657775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CannibalTelegram |
| Description | By @WomenRightsTelegram @DefenceTelegram @GenRevolutionOfficial @FactsTelegramChannels - @UtoyaMassaker @AndersBehringBreivikTelegram @BreivikDeathSentence @BreivikHumanRights @RecidivismFacts @LearnWithNorway @ParoleFacts @DeathSentenceNOW |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 16 February 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CannibalTelegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 94 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 94 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 16 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How many death penalty in this scene? 1x to the girl selling human bodies for torture and cannibalism! 1x to the bodyguard 1x to the cannibal 1x to the CEO behind such torture business 1x to all people working inside such business! So at least 4, but it would be much more! Plus we need to consider all corrupted people outside this business who know that and agree with that! In this case all that is getting mor…
Well, everyone knows animal torture https://t.me/AnimalCrueltyFacts https://t.me/BauernprotestRealitat and almost everyone is giving a shit to animal torture or better to animal and the whole planet! https://t.me/NatureFreaksFacts/650 https://t.me/WorldWar3Facts/26 https://t.me/AspergerSyndromeTelegram/53 because keeping eyes closed is easier https://t.me/KeepEyesClosed but you know what? WITH CLOSED EYES PROBLEMS…
Yes, Facebook stands for Dahmer government crimes! Congrats! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/144 https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7 https://t.me/GovernmentCrimes Like Facebook stands for suicides crimes! https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/150 Just another example of Facebook = SHIT! https://t.me/FacebookShit It was flagged by our technology • 16h Facebook took it down • 16h (just now) An admin disagreed with this decision 🤦…
Dahmer 📖
Let's take the images shared by Ukrainians to show Amnesty reality* https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx where we can exactly say this is true and not manipulation (= self defence excuses, in the style of Israel or Palestine) Ukraine "Please stop creating a false reality where all are guilty of something. Start telling the truth about what Russia is today" PS: NO ONE IS INNOCENT! No Ukraine, No Russia, No France, …
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262 ... descubrió que todos estos estudios tienen fallas fundamentales. = found that all of these studies are fundamentally flawed. We already answered that https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226 https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117 Same can b…
One to one with Reddit comments Part 4 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/171 But obviously NOT all terrorists do suicide! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/173 Breivik was READY to die before the attack (WITH FEAR), but once done, he wished to remain alive! even if he was of the opinion "that no death penalty is shit"! https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/44 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/101 Let we remember Theodore …
I am dying waiting for justice?????! NOPE Let we say things like they are! I wish i could die but i cannot die, because they apply to me forced feeding! https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1527 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93 knowing exactly i never go away from this INFERNO! but obviously, better to focus on ban of the death penalty for 100% criminal, instead of fixing such no sense Guantanamo, where we should put Breivik! …
No matter what: NO VIP SUICIDE!!! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102 https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/75 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/31 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/15 except for https://t.me/DahmerDeathSentence but at least someone with brain, who understand death penalty IS assisted suicide! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/170 Backup by @CannibalTel…
Dahmer? 0 results in the book Breivik? 0 results in the book Right Wing? 0 results in the book Norway? Not relevant Utøya? 0 results in the book Serial Killer? 0 results in the book Cannibal? 0 results in the book Acid? 0 results in the book Fetus? 0 results in the book Homeless? 0 results in the book https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67 P…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @CannibalTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 214,821 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CannibalTelegram named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cannibal Facts on Telegram by GRT : Cannibalism done by inhuman cannibalist who deserve just death sentence penalty per default” (@CannibalTelegram), 94 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CannibalTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.