Channel
@BreivikSex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002134171707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BreivikSex |
| Description | By @WomenRightsTelegram @DefenceTelegram @GenRevolutionOfficial @FactsTelegramChannels - @UtoyaMassaker @AndersBehringBreivikTelegram @BreivikDeathSentence @BreivikHumanRights @BreivikBullshit @RecidivismFacts @ParoleFacts @LearnWithNorway @BreivikErrors |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 22 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BreivikSex |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 51 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 22 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Behind Breivik Sex Bullshit Part 4 Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikSex/62 e) For example you talk about 8 in Switzerland Even this is bullshit because it depends from many factors! https://t.me/BreivikSex/48 Plus the real question is "are such stats real, or people just say random numbers just to look more better or whatever ...". So again, stats are shit! https://t.me/BreivikSex/86 f) do you remember 4 and 8 in USA? …
Well, let we go back to Breivik "best friend" Zaniar Matapour https://t.me/BreivikParole/81 Perfect, first they talk about abortion ban! https://t.me/BreivikParole/73 a missing abortion that was available in Norway too (but still not a ban). A missing human right that is an indirect cause of Utøya massacre too! https://t.me/BreivikBullshit/12 like other errors done by Norway already BEFORE THE ATTACK! https://t.me/B…
Behind Breivik Sex Bullshit Part 3 Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikSex/62 So again a) stats are shit! b) talking about women and ignoring what men are doing is DISCRIMINATION! https://t.me/BreivikSex/33 Ok, 🍌 need to be inserted in 🍑 👄 of a woman, but this doesn't mean to look just what women are doing, GIVING A SHIT TO WHAT MEN ARE DOING! https://t.me/BreivikSex/33 Same can be said for other things, means don't see…
Behind Breivik Sex Bullshit Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikSex/62 So he hates Muslims and we don't support that at all! NO DISCRIMINATION! https://t.me/DiscriminationTelegram https://t.me/NoBreivikMania https://t.me/MuslimTerrorists and this already show the first problem .... YOU CANNOT GENERALISE WHAT SOME PEOPLE ARE DOING WITH ALL PEOPLE! https://t.me/AfDFakten/736 If you did a terror attack killing 78+ pe…
An example of right wing bullshit? This! Like said previously MASS MIGRATION / FOREIGNERS ARE NOT SYNONYM OF CRIMINALITY! https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1009 Yes, foreigners do more crimes, like black people, but we forget that Switzerland IS DOING NOTHING for crimes like this https://t.me/LawsTelegram/104 made by 🇨🇭 people! Again, you can import 300k, but if in such 300k there are not the 1000 criminals, you will n…
NEIN die Leuten haben NICHT RECHT! Das haben wir schon gesagt! https://t.me/VergewaltigungFakten/488 https://t.me/VergewaltigungFakten/462 https://t.me/VergewaltigungFakten/472 OHNE 🇹🇷, KANNST DU DIE PIZZA FÜR 12 CHF VERGESSEN IN DER SCHWEIZ! Dann kannst du es für 25 kaufen, ausser Tessin und ... Anders Behring Breivik ate 🇹🇷🍕too 🤣 https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/921 Switzerland? NO 🇹🇷 again! It's 🇩🇿! https://t.me/…
Update Messerangriffe https://t.me/VergewaltigungFakten/462 Turkey 🇹🇷 in Germany 1.5 mio = 2% Berlin 3866385 Turkey in Berlin 103 572 = 103 572 / 3866385 = 3% also wieder ziemlich ähnlich ... auch wenn wir vorher geschrieben haben Messerangriffe für Deutschland statt Berlin ... Im Bericht des Bundesministeriums des Innern und für Heimat (Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik (PKS) 2021 – Ausgewählte Zahlen im Überblic…
Germany 84.6 mio, 71855657 are 🇩🇪 Turkey 🇹🇷 in Germany 1.5 mio = 2% Messerangriffe 1030 🇩🇪 141 🇹🇷 This means 1487110 - 141 = 1486969 haven't done that!!! YES OVER 1 MIO!!! HOW THE HELL CAN YOU COMPARE 141 WITH 1487110 —> this is 0.009%!!!!!!!! so you consider 99.991% criminals too! For Germany 0.001% ... Not that 141/ 141+1030 = 12% was done by 🇹🇷 compared to 2% we said previously ... = Turkey more criminal = Tur…
Sorry the stats about Messerangriffe are about Berlin ... but doesn't really matter ... the concept behind is pretty the same! Zudem eine Sache noch! Arbeit an anderen Wissenschaftlern zu delegieren IST KEINE ARBEIT ZU MACHEN! Ist einfach nur faul sein! https://t.me/AfDFakten/1273 Our correction related to the previous post https://t.me/VergewaltigungFakten/462 Conclusion: stop discriminating what a single person …
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @BreivikSex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 240,561 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BreivikSex named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Breivik sex fact check : behind the topic sexuality / amount of partners / teenager / oralsex and more” (@BreivikSex), 51 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BreivikSex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.