Channel
@PrisonFacts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
113subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001543721454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PrisonFacts |
| Description | It's time that human rights for those who don't respect human rights get listed and the death sentence get discussed not like a tabu or with bullshit! @WomenRightsTelegram @GenRevolutionOfficial @RapeTelegram @EuthanasiaTelegram |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PrisonFacts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 113 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 113 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 114 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 8 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Not happy with the previous graph? https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/93 Let we check another graph and correlate that to death penalty! AGAIN; WE FIND CORRELATION JUST SHIT! and people doing such correlation much more shit! https://t.me/StandForScience https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx To better understand the graph, you can check even the last Amnesty propaganda leak https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/95 Not only t…
Amnesty, what is now your excuses to this fact about death penalty and homicides in America / USA that you are not showing at all! Plus this show again your bullshit about Canada too! No matter if done by Amnesty or https://t.me/AmnestyShit/32 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/101 Carolyn Hoyle (University of Oxford / Death Penalty Project) https://t.me/CarolynHoyle/92 Like said, we cover all hidden facts that such maf…
In Europe? 3 life sentences in 3 years or maybe even never ... 🤦♂️ when we prefer to give 💴 sentences ... If such dudes deserve life is another question ... she is talking about single murders (like killing the mother) ... https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117 We need to be honest too, homicides were ALWAYS lower in Europe in the last time! If America had a bit less than 10 in 1900, Europe was ⅓ or so! So don't take th…
Our laws / governments / politicians are shit! Part 3 Part 1 https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1906 April 2003, Borgarting lagmannsrett: En 39 år gammel mann, som i 1999 ble dømt til sikring for seksuelle overgrep mot barn under 14 år, får saken behandlet på nytt på grunn av det nye regelverket. Lagmannsretten kommer fram til at mannen slipper tvungent psykisk helsevern da de mener faren for gjentakelse ikke er nærligge…
2014 anmäldes totalt 3 150 va ldtäkter mot barn i a ldern 0 till 17 a r, i 92 % av fallen var offren flickor. A r 2013 förklarades 134 personer skyldiga för va ldtäkt mot barn. Gällande a terfall i brott har personer lagförda för sexualbrott jämförelsevis lägst a terfallsfrekvens om 24 % In 2014, a total of 3,150 rapes against children aged 0 to 17 were reported, in 92% of the cases the victims were girls…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @PrisonFacts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 145,439 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Prisión / Tribunal / Ley / Datos sobre los presos - Gefängnis / Gericht / Gesetz / Gefangenen Fakten - Prison Tribunal Loi Faits” (@PrisonFacts), 113 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrisonFacts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.