Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for бьютиблогово

Channel

бьютиблогово

@vakhrameeva_l_beauty

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,682subscribers

-478 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001266028371
TypeChannel
Username@vakhrameeva_l_beauty
DescriptionОчень просто о косметике и лечении кожи❤️а еще банки, обзоры, сплетни🐀 Я: @vakhrameeva_l Мой мамский канал https://t.me/typicalmamablog Pr: @kate_sp страница в РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673ac1fe290fef0e0115cbcf&regist
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vakhrameeva_l_beauty

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,68215,16014,9217 August 20269 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 94 days, net -478. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,610–15,232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 01:2714,682-9
7 Nov 2026, 18:5714,691-5
6 Nov 2026, 15:5714,696-2
5 Nov 2026, 12:5814,698-2
4 Nov 2026, 14:1814,700+1
3 Nov 2026, 16:1714,699-6
2 Nov 2026, 16:1914,705-13
1 Nov 2026, 13:0614,718-4
31 Oct 2026, 10:5414,722-5
30 Oct 2026, 13:1014,727-7
29 Oct 2026, 11:2814,734-16
28 Oct 2026, 12:5914,750-4
26 Oct 2026, 17:4114,754-1
25 Oct 2026, 18:4914,755-9
23 Oct 2026, 22:3914,764-9
23 Oct 2026, 01:0714,773-6
22 Oct 2026, 03:3714,779-12
20 Oct 2026, 18:2714,791-7
19 Oct 2026, 20:1014,798-8
18 Oct 2026, 23:3014,806first reading

Engagement

149 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.20%
avg views ÷ 14,682 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 149 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held149 (5 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total34,912
Reactions total518
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,760
Videos
≈1,360
Links
≈1,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 30s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,555 reactions across 142 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,33665.7%
🔥61217.2%
😁1684.73%
🥰1213.40%
👍882.48%
😱862.42%
😢551.55%
👏401.13%
🤔220.619%
🤩180.506%
🤬90.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,555 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.68%
4 of 149 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,660
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,460
over 145 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5x7bd4v15 August 20265 August 2026
2W5zFG6F6ie14 November 20264 November 2026
2W5zFGPnGKB126 August 202626 August 2026
2W5zFHrHtQH117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 14:19 UTC575 views6 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

ПОЧЕМУ КОЖА СТАЛА ХУЖЕ ОТ НОВОЙ КОСМЕТИКИ?!😏 Потихоньку завершаю наш #акнемарафон Многие сталкивались с такой ситуацией, но не всегда понимают, как правильно действовать, давайте раскроем несколько моментов🙌🏻 1. Что такое обострение, или так называемый purging? При введении некоторых средств, ускоряющих обновление клеток (например, ретиноидов и отдельных кислот), временно могут становиться заметнее уже формирующиес…

❤6

9 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC857 views34 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

МОЯ УВАЖИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПРИЧИНА❤️ Последние несколько дней я провела на ретрите вместе с психологом и невероятно классной компанией близких мне людей. Одним из условий было максимально ограничить использование телефона, не зависать в социальных сетях и не забивать голову лишним информационным шумом Я старалась🫂 Практически не заходила никуда, была на связи только с мужем и дочкой, а всё остальное время посвящала себе, лю…

❤24🔥10

8 Nov 2026, 19:43 UTC≈1,140 views38 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Я уже на связи❤️но еще в Дагестане

❤31👍4🔥3

7 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,360 views24 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Благодарю ребят за возможность попробовать новинки🫂 Обзор на маски я Вам уже приготовила, так как добралась до них еще раньше😏 Ждите))

❤15🔥9

7 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,310 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤5

7 Nov 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,350 views18 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

КАРТА АКНЕ НА ЛИЦЕ‼️ И МОЖНО ЛИ ПО ВЫСЫПАНИЯМ НА ЛИЦЕ ПОНЯТЬ, ЧТО ПРОИСХОДИТ С ОРГАНИЗМОМ? #акнемарафон Девочки, наверняка Вы встречали схемы, где каждой зоне лица приписывают определённый орган: прыщи на подбородке - проблемы с гормонами, на лбу - с кишечником, на щеках - с чем-то ещё…. Но доказательной базы у таких «карт акне» нет. По одной только зоне высыпаний нельзя определить состояние внутренних органов ил…

❤15🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,220 views11 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

ПРОГРАММА ЗАКРЫТОГО КАНАЛА🌿 Когда я только начинала путь к здоровой коже, я мечтала, чтобы кто-то просто сказал мне: «Вот с чего начать. Вот порядок. Вот зачем это нужно». Никаких бесконечных видео, противоречивых советов и пустых баночек. Именно поэтому я создала курс, который помогает понять не только “что делать”, но и “почему”⬇️ 🧖‍♀️1. Диагностика кожи Обсуждаем, как определить свой тип и текущее состояние кожи…

❤10😁1

6 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC≈1,170 views11 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Да, я поступила с Вами очень некрасиво🙄 праститиии меня… Девочки, так как я пропала с радаров на пару дней…я как будто не оставила Вам возможности вступить в мой закрытый канал с уходом🥲 Поэтому решила продлить возможность вступить на особых условиях 🙌🏻 Стоимость доступа пока сохраняю - 1700 рублей вместо 1900‼️ И НЕ ПОДНИМУ ДО КОНЦА НЕДЕЛИ! ПИСАТЬ СЮДА 👉🏻 @vakhrameeva_l и я отправлю подробности❤️ И ещё один важн…

❤9👏2

6 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,190 views42 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Рассказываю подробнее, мы в Дагестане❤️ Улетели с девочками в ретрит с психологом. Тут хорошо, даже очень🤞🏻 спокойно, красиво, и очень уютно. Связи днем нет, да и телефоны мы практически не берем в руки. Отношусь к этому, как к мощной перезарядке - отдыхать тоже нужно уметь🙈

❤28🔥14

6 Nov 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,380 views14 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Девочки, ну как же я люблю такие коллаборации! ❤️ SMORODINA объединились с MONOCHROME, и теперь их творение хочется рассматривать со всех сторон! Получился необычный союз мира косметики и моды: бренд натуральной косметики и один из самых узнаваемых российских фэшн-брендов встретились в одном проекте🔥 SMORODINA отвечают за косметические формулы, MONOCHROME - за свой узнаваемый стиль и экспертизу в работе с тканями. …

❤13🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,250 views10 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Девы, связи нет, зато есть эмоции - это потрясающе 😐

❤10

5 Nov 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,650 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Мы на месте спустя 14 часов…я в ахуИ

❤32🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @vakhrameeva_l_beauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Девичник у Вики
@vika_zhinkina · 28,032
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 9 September 2026
Парикмахер вещает @push_dish
@DianaPushkova · 30,474
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Lab.Vera
@beauty_blogers · 53,515
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
ЗАГОТОВКИ от irova.life
@irovalife · 111,118
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“бьютиблогово” (@vakhrameeva_l_beauty), 14,682 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vakhrameeva_l_beauty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.