Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The Daily iGaming

@DailyiGamingEN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59,861subscribers

-511 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002215953704
TypeChannel
Username@DailyiGamingEN
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DailyiGamingEN

Growth

59,86160,37260,116.57 August 2026 — 60,372 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,372 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,359 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,301 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,241 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,190 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,114 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,035 subscribers14 August 2026 — 59,966 subscribers15 August 2026 — 59,861 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,784–60,449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 14:1759,861-105
14 Aug 2026, 02:0659,966-69
12 Aug 2026, 19:0360,035-79
11 Aug 2026, 18:0260,114-76
10 Aug 2026, 19:1760,190-51
9 Aug 2026, 22:3160,241-60
8 Aug 2026, 20:5360,301-58
7 Aug 2026, 19:4060,359-13
7 Aug 2026, 13:4560,372no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:3960,372first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 59,861 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,370
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held44 (30 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total280,341
Reactions total2,974
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,974 reactions across 42 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39413.2%
💯36312.2%
🥰33411.2%
❤‍🔥33211.2%
🤩32510.9%
👍31410.6%
🎉31110.5%
😍30910.4%
🔥2929.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,974reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC206 views69 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

8% of parents in New York try to earn money for their children's school supplies through gambling and betting 70% consider the back-to-school period the most stressful time of the year. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #NY #Gambling

❤‍🔥12🎉12🥰10🔥8😍8👍6🤩65

14 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC≈6,610 views58 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Prediction Markets Weekly Roundup: CFTC Escalates New York Fight as State Challenges Mount New York continued to be the center of prediction market litigation this week, headlined by an extraordinary Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) intervention in the Kalshi battle, a New York City Council probe into operators, and Novig being denied immediate relief in its first legal challenge. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #Kals

🎉10💯10🥰9😍7❤‍🔥5🔥5🤩5👍4

14 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈3,640 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Prediction Markets Flag Dozens of Suspected Insider Traders as CFTC Enforcement Lags Prediction market platforms have begun flagging potential insider traders at a rapid pace. The surge is testing the resources and legal tools of a federal regulator already operating with its smallest staff in at least two decades. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #CFTC #Prediction

14 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,540 views113 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Chicago City Council Demands Bally’s Resume Casino Construction A majority of Chicago’s City Council is demanding that Bally’s resume full construction of its $1.7 billion casino development after the company paused work on several non-gaming components. The latest development escalates an ongoing dispute over video gaming terminals (VGTs) while raising new questions over the operator’s finances. @DailyiGamingEN🗞

🤩20🎉17😍14👍13💯13🔥1110❤‍🔥8

14 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC194 views72 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

iGaming No Longer the Sure Bet It Once was Considered — In New York or Elsewhere SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY – Anyone harboring hopes that New York would entertain legalizing iGaming anytime soon had their optimism dashed by state Assemblymember Carrie Woerner on Tuesday. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #NY #iGaming

13👍11💯10😍9🤩8❤‍🔥7🔥6🎉4

13 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈6,790 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

A court in Chile has ordered telecommunications companies (Claro, Entel, GTD, Telefónica (Movistar), WOM, and VTR) to block illegal gambling websites. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #Chile #Gambling

💯10🥰98🤩8🎉7👍4🔥4😍4

13 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC487 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

iGaming accounted for 45.2% of the total Philippine market revenue in Q2 2026 ($675 million) Last year, the figure stood at $1.04 billion. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #Philippine #iGaming

❤‍🔥7💯7🤩7🥰7🎉65👍5🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC≈19,800 views56 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

26% of Gen Z investors view sports betting as a deliberate part of their long-term financial strategy Last year, 52% redirected funds originally intended for investments into betting. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #GenZ #Betting

💯13❤‍🔥10👍86😍6🎉4🔥4🥰3

13 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈8,580 views61 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Gambling and Prediction Market Interests Pour Millions Into Florida Elections, Largely to Donalds Gambling companies and tribal gaming stakeholders have poured more than $12 million into Florida politics ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, as sportsbook operators and prediction market companies eye a state dominated by the Seminole Tribe. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #Gambling #Florida

👍16💯107❤‍🔥7🥰6🎉5🔥5🤩4

13 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈10,700 views125 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

NYC Council Probes Prediction Markets Over Alleged Deceptive Marketing The New York City Council has launched an investigation into four major prediction market platforms over their advertising practices and potential targeting of minors, adding another front to New York’s ongoing battle with the industry. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #NYC #Prediction

❤‍🔥19🥰18😍1713🎉13👍12💯12🤩12

12 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈6,820 views181 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

CFTC Orders Kalshi to Keep Operating as New York Seeks Shutdown The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has issued an emergency order to require Kalshi to continue operating in New York, even if a state court rules that the platform must shut down operations in the state. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #NY #Kalshi

🤩28💯2623🥰21❤‍🔥20🎉20🔥20👍12

12 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,810 views61 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Malta, Spain, Portugal, and Italy have opposed the introduction of a pan-European 3% turnover tax on operators The levy could generate up to €1.9 billion annually. @DailyiGamingEN🗞 #Tax #Operator

14❤‍🔥9🥰8🎉7💯6🔥6😍5👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @DailyiGamingEN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 798,398 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Daily iGaming” (@DailyiGamingEN), 59,861 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DailyiGamingEN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.