Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CleverMind

Channel

CleverMind

@CleverMindRu_Official

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

28,242subscribers

+110 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001382451773
TypeChannel
Username@CleverMindRu_Official
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CleverMindRu_Official

Growth

28,13228,24228,1876 August 2026 — 28,132 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,148 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,157 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,181 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,189 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,202 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,207 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,207 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,216 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,223 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,242 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,116–28,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:1828,242+19
16 Aug 2026, 07:2328,223+7
14 Aug 2026, 19:5328,216+9
14 Aug 2026, 18:4728,207no change
13 Aug 2026, 11:2428,207+5
12 Aug 2026, 12:3828,202+13
11 Aug 2026, 09:4728,189+8
10 Aug 2026, 07:1828,181+24
9 Aug 2026, 05:0728,157+9
8 Aug 2026, 06:0328,148+16
6 Aug 2026, 23:5528,132first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.0%
avg views ÷ 28,242 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,000
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 May 202615 August 2026)
Views total142,830
Reactions total3,049
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,441 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,02215.9%
👍87513.6%
😈86913.5%
💊78512.2%
🤔66010.2%
65110.1%
🔥5208.07%
🗿5017.78%
🌭4496.97%
🤯560.869%
👎530.823%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,441reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 18 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CleverMindRu_Official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈5,540 views179 reactions4 Starsread 17 August 2026

https://youtu.be/xNasoQPKwfg?si=cTfj-7tfnHH8jhZa

🔥9823👍16😈12💊9🌭6👎6🗿3

13 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈7,490 views287 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Готовлю вам грязь в новом выпуске о самой честной статистике🤝 Постараюсь выложить завтра или послезавтра🤗

😈10456👍42😁31🔥22🌭10🗿9💊5

10 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈10,700 views530 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Почему тебя не прет от добавок? Без пруфов, только оценочное мнение человека, кто давно принимает/продает/изучает добавки🙂 Я бы выделил 2 основных момента, к которым пришел с годами. 1. 💊БАДы – это не фарма и не запрещенные вещества. Они вообще не должны сильно «вставлять», но из этого выходит мощная проблема: Недобросовестные производители Спасибо продавцам микродоз, гомеопатии и настоек на палках, которые обещ

😈289😁16326👍26💊12🔥5🗿3🤔3

5 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈14,500 views967 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Это будет выпуск о самой честной «сексуальной» статистике (я и сам ловлю фейспалм, пока подбираю кадры под текст) а. Чтобы сделать выпуски о привлекательности и гормонах мне нужно было залезть в сексуальную статистику) б. Понял, что она вся «кривая». Обходными путями нашел данные реальные и скорректировал. 🔎И теперь открываются некоторые биоФАКИ о которых обычно не говорят в обществе, но которые реально кому-то могу

🤔357🗿188168😈167😁25🔥22👍15💊12

28 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC≈18,300 views283 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

У нас тут мужицкий дождь получается. Я обычно таким не злоупотребляю, но если есть вариант: "выбрать именно этот опрос - поделиться" и отправить подругам😇 Никаких подписок не надо) Выйдет ролик - аудитория женская станет все равно немного больше😎 Тут только разовый опрос🤝

👍141😁63🌭4714🗿5🔥4🤔3💊2

28 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC≈16,600 views126 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

Сексуальная привлекательность женщины

  1. Я женщина, посмотреть результаты9%
  2. Лицо68%
  3. Телосложение77%
  4. Уход, запах и стиль48%
  5. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия39%
  6. Интеллект27%
  7. Голос23%
  8. Статус и ресурсы2%

The shares total 293%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁76🤔21🌭13💊73👍3🗿2🤯1

28 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC≈14,900 views107 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

Общая привлекательность женщины

  1. Лицо71%
  2. Телосложение71%
  3. Уход, запах и стиль53%
  4. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия53%
  5. Интеллект40%
  6. Голос26%
  7. Статус и ресурсы5%

The shares total 319%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁75💊9🤯75🗿4🤔4🌭3

28 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC≈14,600 views267 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

Сексуальная привлекательность мужчины

  1. Я мужчина, посмотреть результаты87%
  2. Лицо5%
  3. Телосложение и рост7%
  4. Уход, запах и стиль6%
  5. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия8%
  6. Интеллект6%
  7. Голос4%
  8. Статус и ресурсы3%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁194🌭35🗿235🤔4🔥3💊2😈1

28 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈12,200 views82 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

Общая привлекательность мужчины

  1. Лицо35%
  2. Телосложение и рост54%
  3. Уход, запах и стиль37%
  4. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия68%
  5. Интеллект50%
  6. Голос24%
  7. Статус и ресурсы31%

The shares total 299%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤔50🤯14👍95💊4

28 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC≈11,400 views106 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Математическая модель привлекательности Пишу статью как тебе себя оценить по 10 бальной шкале👀 Это продолжение вот этого поста, если кто не в курсе. 🫆Уже очень хорошая доказательная база вырисовывается, есть понимание, что именно мы оцениваем при взгляде на другого человека. Тут нельзя лицемерить и говорить, что всех людей воспринимаешь одинаково. А если изначально даешь оценку, то это уже типо плохо. Либо обман и

57🤔19🔥15👍10😁3🌭1😈1

24 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC≈16,600 views115 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Теперь ты захочешь подключить свою старую нокию к компу) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8te_j7TUtY

😁4324👍15🔥15💊6🤯5👎4🗿2

10 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC≈20,600 views871 reactions7 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Тестостерон стал в 2 раза ниже за 50 лет В последние дни стали попадаться новости о снижении уровня тестостерона у мужчин. И, в первый раз, я прошел мимо, как будто кто-то еще сомневался, что «раньше было лучше»🙂. Потом снова эти новости, мысли уже скорее: «это же информация прошлых лет». Помню, как мы с Глебом с Простых мыслей примерно в одно и тоже время делали разборы в этой теме. Мы не договаривались, если что)

🌭304😈269💊143🗿6034👍23😁20🔥10

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CleverMindRu_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTCAnonymous Poll4,760 voters approx.

Сексуальная привлекательность женщины

  1. Я женщина, посмотреть результаты9%
  2. Лицо68%
  3. Телосложение77%
  4. Уход, запах и стиль48%
  5. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия39%
  6. Интеллект27%
  7. Голос23%
  8. Статус и ресурсы2%

The shares total 293%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTCAnonymous Poll4,180 voters approx.

Общая привлекательность женщины

  1. Лицо71%
  2. Телосложение71%
  3. Уход, запах и стиль53%
  4. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия53%
  5. Интеллект40%
  6. Голос26%
  7. Статус и ресурсы5%

The shares total 319%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTCAnonymous Poll4,710 voters approx.

Сексуальная привлекательность мужчины

  1. Я мужчина, посмотреть результаты87%
  2. Лицо5%
  3. Телосложение и рост7%
  4. Уход, запах и стиль6%
  5. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия8%
  6. Интеллект6%
  7. Голос4%
  8. Статус и ресурсы3%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTCAnonymous Poll3,330 voters approx.

Общая привлекательность мужчины

  1. Лицо35%
  2. Телосложение и рост54%
  3. Уход, запах и стиль37%
  4. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия68%
  5. Интеллект50%
  6. Голос24%
  7. Статус и ресурсы31%

The shares total 299%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 797,559 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CleverMind” (@CleverMindRu_Official), 28,242 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CleverMindRu_Official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.