Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CleverMind

Channel

CleverMind

@CleverMindRu_Official

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,725subscribers

+593 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001382451773
TypeChannel
Username@CleverMindRu_Official
DescriptionНоотропы, Биохакинг, Мозг
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/CleverMindRu_Official

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,13228,72528,428.56 August 2026 — 28,132 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,148 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,157 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,181 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,189 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,202 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,207 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,207 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,216 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,223 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,242 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,270 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,283 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,292 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,281 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,287 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,301 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,320 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,325 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,333 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,350 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,380 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,406 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,437 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,445 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,471 subscribers5 September 2026 — 28,486 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,527 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,542 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,565 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,571 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,595 subscribers2 October 2026 — 28,725 subscribers6 August 20262 October 2026
33 measurements spanning 56 days, net +593. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,043–28,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 11:1928,725+130
16 Sept 2026, 11:4028,595+24
14 Sept 2026, 17:0028,571+6
13 Sept 2026, 01:5828,565+23
11 Sept 2026, 06:2228,542+15
8 Sept 2026, 11:2128,527+41
5 Sept 2026, 06:5828,486+15
3 Sept 2026, 14:3728,471+26
2 Sept 2026, 06:2228,445+8
1 Sept 2026, 04:3528,437+31
31 Aug 2026, 01:4528,406+26
30 Aug 2026, 03:1728,380+30
29 Aug 2026, 01:5328,350+17
28 Aug 2026, 00:4628,333+8
27 Aug 2026, 04:0428,325+5
26 Aug 2026, 00:5628,320+19
25 Aug 2026, 01:5728,301+14
23 Aug 2026, 14:3628,287+6
21 Aug 2026, 23:5828,281-11
20 Aug 2026, 16:2928,292first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.2%
avg views ÷ 28,725 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,400
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held31 (22 May 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total86,770
Reactions total2,416
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 11:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
173
Videos
3
Links
233

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11,964 reactions across 30 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😈2,65322.2%
👍1,58413.2%
😁1,54212.9%
❤1,40111.7%
🤔1,26210.5%
🔥1,0098.43%
🗿9868.24%
💊8587.17%
🌭4944.13%
👎990.827%
🤯760.635%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,964 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,071
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 30 we hold a reading for · 77%
Most on one post
290
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CleverMindRu_Official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC≈6,910 views351 reactions40 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Заметил интересный вопрос под последним постом на ютубе😏 Зачем вообще пить что-то и разгонять мозг? И вроде похожие посты были) Но я смотрю многим нравятся именно авторские мысли, поэтому чаще вхожу «в контакт», не через стекло публикаций как обычно😇 Но если такое не норм - можешь задизлайкать с разных акк😅

👍223❤68🔥35🗿7🤔6👎5🌭3💊2

25 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈7,500 views142 reactions97 Starsread 2 October 2026

Мой самый замороченный выпуск за последний год-2) Осторожно, может сильно повысить/снизить ЧСВ😀 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cbiO79ybUA

👍76🔥28❤23😈7👎4💊2🌭1🗿1

23 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC≈8,460 views308 reactions73 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Авторский: Почему я тренирую не только мозг 🫆Когда я создавал CleverMind, основной интерес сводился к прокачке мозга. Но чем дольше я всем этим занимаюсь, тем меньше мне нравится сама идея отдельно «прокачивать мозг». Это же вроде бы логично, мозг и тело как бы вместе живут, вместе с кровообращением, желудком и мышцами. Серотонин есть и в кишечнике, и в мозге. Креатин про мышцы, мозг и энергию. Все очень сильно пер…

🔥183👍51❤47💊10😁5🌭3🤯3👎2

18 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC≈11,800 views343 reactions71 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Как я делал формулу привлекательности эффективности человека Пока монтирую – расскажу про свою многофакторную систему оценки человека😎 Сейчас я уже думаю, что это не сколько про привлекательность, сколько про общую эффективность человека в баллах из 10. Телосложение, EQ. харизма, эмпатия, самоконтроль, гигиена, интеллект... Это все ТОЧНО нужно тебе для здоровья, продолжительности жизни, счастья и т.п. То есть смысл…

😈188🗿55🔥30❤28👍22💊6👎5🤔5

12 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTC≈15,100 views373 reactions33 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Что мужчины и женщины замечают друг в друге первым Продолжаем цикл тем про привлекательность. Потом будет про НЗТ и наши новые добавки, не переживай. Я не уйду окончательно в луксмаксинг)) 🤓И привлекательность иногда изучают через тепловые карты. Ученые надевают на тебя очки и смотрят eye-tracking, куда именно ты пялишься при взгляде на другого человека) Сейчас это не чисто «про привлекательность», а про одежду, сти…

😈166🤔77❤48👍37😁15🔥11🗿8🌭4

8 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC≈18,000 views154 reactions47 Starsread 2 October 2026

Кто любит графики и рисунки из публикаций – точно оцените) Тут про эстрадиол, тестостерон и кортизол и как они могут изменить твои взгляды, влечение к тебе и от тебя даже за 1 день! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXwQAEu01wU П.с. Оч надеюсь на ваше чувство юмора в отношении одной вставки😇

❤83👍31🔥20😁8🌭4💊4🤔3👎1

4 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC≈19,000 views745 reactions37 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Почему сексуальность стала стигмой? 🧩 В начале крупицы пазла: 1. Недавно был пост про то, что средний уровень тестостерона у мужчин стал в 2 раза ниже за последние 50 лет. 2. Позавчера пост, что более высокий тест заставляет тебя менять предпочтения в выборе женщины (в сторону более привлекательных). 3. В некоторых других публикациях так или иначе мелькают похожие идеи (1, 2). Ниже цитаты «Мужчины, которые считали …

😈473🗿140👍48❤43🔥13💊10😁9🌭6

2 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC≈17,200 views363 reactions17 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Тестостерон меняет то, какие женщины тебе нравятся (и мужчины) Попалось провокационное исследование, будет в новом выпуске о гормонах. Отрывок получился небольшим, поэтому под него захотел сделать пост подробнее😏 Вообще данных довольно много, что более высокий тестостерон немного форматирует твои взгляды на женщин. И идет смещение в сторону феминности / женственности. Но тут в публикации мужчинам подсунули на оценк…

😈182🗿60😁57❤24👍14🔥10🌭7🤯4

30 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈15,800 views1,134 reactions290 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Авторский: про детей и оптимизацию жизни Недавно у меня родился второй сын и есть некоторые мысли, которые могут быть полезны тебе на стыке биохакинга, семейной и личной жизни, вопросов саморазвития. Тебя это может коснуться в будущем, или уже сейчас) Как оптимизировать жизнь, когда дома шум, подгузники, коляски, а ты все так же хочешь держать себя в форме, гулять, повышать скилы по работе и «расти» как и раньше. …

😈393😁285🤔279❤59🗿49🔥30👍26💊6

28 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈14,100 views596 reactions13 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Овуляция – это как если бы твой тестостерон взлетал в 5 раз на 4 дня) Монтирую про гормоны и то, как они даже за один день меняют привлекательность👻. Конкретно тут рисунок про менструальные циклы, эстрадиол и вероятность зачатия. 9% против 0-1-2-4%. 🖤Что это за пик? - В этот пик эстрадиол у женщины примерно в 2-5 раз выше, чем в другие дни. - В этот пик выше привлекательность. При сравнении композитного фото лиц де…

🤔191😈163🗿148❤37🔥20👍15🌭6💊6

24 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈17,300 views315 reactions19 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Вес и пропорции - №1 для привлекательности (не душа🤧) Продолжаем тред о привлекательности) WHR | SWR + ИМТ : Эти 3 сокращения дают наибольший эффект для внешнего вида. Вы, наверно, слышали про Эффект Ореола, когда более симпатичные люди автоматически кажутся нам умнее и добрее. Недавно вы сами голосовали в опросах, где вычисляли общую и сексуальную привлекательность. В этих опросах в топах было телосложение💪. Но ч…

😈152😁87❤37👍19💊7👎5🤔4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @CleverMindRu_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@CleverMindRu_Official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTCAnonymous Poll5,120 voters approx.

Сексуальная привлекательность женщины

  1. Я женщина, посмотреть результаты9%
  2. Лицо68%
  3. Телосложение77%
  4. Уход, запах и стиль48%
  5. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия39%
  6. Интеллект27%
  7. Голос23%
  8. Статус и ресурсы3%

The shares total 294%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTCAnonymous Poll4,500 voters approx.

Общая привлекательность женщины

  1. Лицо71%
  2. Телосложение71%
  3. Уход, запах и стиль53%
  4. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия53%
  5. Интеллект40%
  6. Голос26%
  7. Статус и ресурсы5%

The shares total 319%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTCAnonymous Poll4,990 voters approx.

Сексуальная привлекательность мужчины

  1. Я мужчина, посмотреть результаты87%
  2. Лицо5%
  3. Телосложение и рост7%
  4. Уход, запах и стиль6%
  5. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия8%
  6. Интеллект6%
  7. Голос4%
  8. Статус и ресурсы3%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTCAnonymous Poll3,520 voters approx.

Общая привлекательность мужчины

  1. Лицо35%
  2. Телосложение и рост54%
  3. Уход, запах и стиль37%
  4. EQ: Юмор, харизма, эмпатия67%
  5. Интеллект50%
  6. Голос24%
  7. Статус и ресурсы31%

The shares total 298%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

БИОХАКИНГ И НООТРОПЫ | АНДРЕЙ АРБЕНИН 🅰️
@andreyarbenin · 24,574
#1
Ноотропы и Биохакинг | RISE
@mind_rise · 39,138
#2
National Biohacking😎
@NationalBiohackingg · 1,104
#3
Neural Hack
@neuralhacking · 11,475
#4
Limar freedom
@fr33domchannel · 14,594
#5
BIO X
@japaneseqs · 614
#6
Нейромицелий
@neuromycelium · 6,042
#7
FUCK BADs
@fuckbads · 5,166
#8
Brotherhood
@brotherhood_channels · 2,034
#9
DOC
@zametkidoca · 1,923
#10
BioGuru
@bioxakeri · 1,395
#11
EVALITE.Base
@evalitebase · 2,639
#12
Биохакинг? Ну типа
@onlybiohuckingshit · 1,361
#13
YouIron
@youiron · 6,230
#14
Antistress Diet - психология, нутрициология, фитнес
@antistressdiet · 936
#15
Максим БАДовик | здоровье без хаоса
@badovik · 1,651
#16
BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 175,638
#17
Ivan Limarev / Merlin AI
@LimarevIvan · 12,203
#18
ЕСАКОВ | Искусство убеждать
@esakovconsulting · 1,264
#19
Глеб Соломин 🚀 24.05.2025
@gleb_solomin · 60,035
#20
Нейротипология
@misliglubzhe · 10,560
#21
Ветров Консультант
@vetrovconsultant · 9,117
#22
Иван Халилов ДЛЯ СВОИХ🔥
@ivankhalilov · 76,837
#23
Denis I Reloading
@DenisZenin · 144
#24
MENTOR MIND🖤
@mentor_mind_ru · 3,778
#25
valentin later
@LaterWeShallSee · 14,439
#26
Roman Ovcharóv
@ovcharovblog · 29,838
#27
Косточкин.ПРО | Здоровье
@zametkikostochkina · 252
#28
Егор НеНастоящий 🥵
@egor_paywall · 2,141
#29
Socrates
@kazbeksocrates · 3,796
#30
EVALITE.Superfood
@evalitesuperfood · 5,093
#31
Авантюрист
@freedomofsoul2004 · 497
#32
КУКУХА КРЕАТОРА
@kamenskiy_egor · 2,617
#33
take/action
@jujutsyn_tg · 478
#34
neoteamfan79
@neoteamfan79 · 2,258
#35
Evidence Based Cult
@evidencebasedcult · 8,176
#36
Справочник Биофакера.
@biofaker_link · 1,236
#37
Блюм | Академия здоровья
@blumcentre · 4,428
#38
️️️️
@psycho_cats · 24
#39
Мартин | Саморазвитие
@slivmartin · 5,156
#40
Микология
@psilcitrat · 3,518
#41
ТВОЙ ТЕСТОСТЕРОН
@einher · 5,882
#42
Михаил Гребенников / Тренировка зрения
@mihailgrebennikov · 2,104
#43
FUNGILINE • Грибная аптека Михаила Вишневского
@fungiline_moscow · 21,914
#44
СамСебеМастер/Эволюция Потребителя
@samsebemasterok · 501
#45
Юный гений
@kanalyongogenia · 795 (as read 15 September 2026)
#46
Штанга FM
@shtangafm · 13,801
#47
Школа Алины Каримовой
@alina_krmv11 · 1,223
#48
CryptoSan
@cryptosaniksin · 1,076
#49
Purple Chronicles
@CherepawwkaChannel · 1,731
#50
EVOLUTION YETI
@evolutionyeti · 6,998
#51
Скрытый смысл
@skrsm · 6,188
#52
Митрохин | Фотография & Личный бренд
@mitroxxin · 577
#53
Фонд «1Помогает»
@bf1pomogaet · 619
#54
INSTRBY - про инструмент и полезные вещи
@instrby_club · 6,022
#55

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

БИОХАКИНГ И НООТРОПЫ | АНДРЕЙ АРБЕНИН 🅰️
@andreyarbenin · 24,574
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
Ноотропы и Биохакинг | RISE
@mind_rise · 39,138
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CleverMind” (@CleverMindRu_Official), 28,725 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CleverMindRu_Official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.