Channel
@Metapedia_Deutsch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
8,777subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001353324029 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Metapedia_Deutsch |
| Created | 8 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Metapedia_Deutsch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 8,777 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 8,775 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 8,776 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 8,777 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 8,777 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (27 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,969 |
| Reactions total | 302 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
302 reactions across 30 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 221 | 73.2% | |
| 👎 | 81 | 26.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ Rettende Insel Wenn Parteien sich und Massen Sichtbar und geräuschvoll hassen Klingt das mir wie Meeresrauschen. Und dann mag ich henkelltrocken Still auf einer Insel hocken, Die mich zusehn läßt und lauschen. Nicht, daß ich dann etwa schürfe Oder was dazwischen würfe Oder schlichten wollte, nein, Nein, ich weiß, das muß so sein. Und ich dehne mich und schlürfe Eingefangnen Sonnenschein. Wechselnd laut und wie…
👍12
Willy Wimmer, Merkel u.a. zur Stationierung neuer US-Atomwaffen in und gegen Deutschland (nukleare Teilhabe) Verweise ◾ Richtigstellungen zur Zeitgeschichte: Hitler wollte keine Atombombe ◾ Weltnetz-Lexikon zu Atomwaffen ◾ Umerziehungsliteratur: Artikel Atombombe: Vaterschaft aberkannt, Der Spiegel, 13/1990, 26. März 1990 (Wasserstoffbombenvater Edward Teller mit Fremdfedern geschmückt) ◾ Raimund Ulbrich: Die er…
👍9
Atombombenexplosionen von 1945 bis 1998 visualisiert „Genehmigte“ Besitzer Folgende Länder besitzen Kernwaffen oder haben Kernwaffenprogramme (Stand 2003): Offizielle Atommächte ◾ VSA (10.656) ◾ Rußland (10.000) ◾ China (402) ◾ Frankreich (348) ◾ Vereinigtes Königreich (185) Faktische Atommächte ◾ Israel (ca. 400 trotz Leugnung) ◾ Indien (30 bis 150) ◾ Pakistan (24 bis 75) Atommacht nach eigener Aussage …
👍6
Atombomben? Einsatz → Hauptartikel: Atombombenabwurf auf Japan 1945 Kernwaffen wurden erstmals im Zweiten Weltkrieg von den VSA in einem Akt gegen Japan – ohne Ankündigung – eingesetzt. Dabei wurden im August 1945 die beiden Städte Hiroshima und Nagasaki beinahe vollständig zerstört und etwa 125.000 Tote verursacht. Die Langzeitfolgen durch Gesundheitsschäden der nachfolgenden Generation sind noch nicht abschätzba…
👍6👎2
Atombombentests 1951-1958 Die Wissenschaftler, die aus dem Dritten Reich geflohen waren, waren noch davon ausgegangen, daß die A-Bomben gegen das deutsche Volk eingesetzt würden, die nun nur bleibende Möglichkeit des Einsatzes gegen das japanische Kaiserreich enttäuschte sie. Anfang des Monats Mai 1945 starteten die ersten 800 Spezialisten, die dafür ausgebildet worden waren, von Seattle auf die Pazifikinsel Tinian…
👍5👎2
Die immer griffbereite ABC-Schutzmaske der Bundeswehr bietet den Soldaten eine, wenngleich begrenzte, Schutzwirkung bei atomaren, biologischen und chemischen Angriffen. Dr. Vannevar Bush und James Conant waren die zivilen Leiter des amerikanischen Atomprogramms. Sie hielten allerdings die britischen Verbündeten mit Informationen sehr knapp, auch war die Zusammenarbeit der Wissenschaftler der beiden Länder gering. In…
👍4
VS-amerikanische Soldaten werden am 1. November 1951 in Nevada absichtlich atomarer Strahlung ausgesetzt Atombomben der VSA Schon vor dem Beginn des Zweiten Weltkrieges richteten die drei aus Deutschland in die Vereinigten Staaten ausgewanderten jüdischen Physiker Leó Szilárd, Albert Einstein und Eugene Wigner einen am 2. August 1939 verfaßten, nur von Einstein unterzeichneten Brief an den damaligen VS-Präsidenten …
👍5
Atom-Arsenale 2003 Seine Meinung: Die Anwendung der Atomenergie zu kriegerischen Zwecken würde letztendlich das Ende der Menschheit bedeuten. Es ist heute auch bekannt, daß Hitler nicht nur den Vortrag gelesen hat, den Prof. Heisenberg 1942 an Kaiser-Willhelm-Institut gehalten hatte (über „Die Kernspaltung und den Bau des Atommeilers mit Uran und die Elektronenschleuder“), sondern auch Berichte anderer, vor 1941 erz…
👍7
Die jüdische Atombombe von Robert Oppenheimer, Albert Einstein, Hans Bethe, Felix Bloch, Immanuel Estermann, Leó Szilárd, Edward Teller und Eugene Wigner Am 20. Januar 1987 erschien zum Houtermans-Verfahren ein sogenannter „Nachdruck als Beitrag zur Geschichte der Kernspaltung in Deutschland“ und erklärte im Vorwort: „Wir haben uns zum hier vorgelegten Nachdruck der im August 1941 abgeschlossenen [sic!] Houtermans-…
👍7
Atompilz von „Fat Man“ über dem japanischen Nagasaki – der erste Test einer Atombombe mit verheerenden Folgen Kernwaffen – auch Nuklearwaffen oder Atomwaffen genannt – sind Waffen, deren Wirkung auf kernphysikalischen Prozessen beruht, insbesondere der Kernspaltung, Kernfusion und dem Effekt der atomaren Kettenreaktion. Konventionelle Waffen beziehen dagegen ihre Explosionsenergie aus chemischen Reaktionen, bei dene…
👎3👍1
Der ehemalige Sonderminister Alfred Loritz bei einer Kundgebung auf dem Königsplatz in München, 12.12.1948 (vorne rechts). Siehe auch ◾ Umerziehung ◾ Deutsche Zivilisten in Lagern der Alliierten ◾ Wer von der Lüge lebt, muß die Wahrheit fürchten! Verweise ◾ Hans-Joachim von Leesen: Recht der Sieger statt Völkerrecht (JF 24/05, 10. Juni 2005 Literataur ◾ Metanoia-Magazin: 100 Jahre Krieg gegen Deutschland. Ein…
👎5
Der US-amerikanische General Lucius D. Clay war von 1946 bis 1949 Militärgouverneur der US-amerikanischen Besatzungszone. Am 10. September 1946 konnte der damalige Sonderminister Anton Pfeiffer (CSU, 1888-1957) im Länderrat berichten, dass inzwischen ein arbeitsfähiges Ministerium fertig und 183 Spruchkammern eingerichtet seien. Jeder Landkreis erhielt mindestens eine Spruchkammer. Daneben wurden sieben Berufungskam…
👎7
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Metapedia_Deutsch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Metapedia_Deutsch edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 201,166 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metapedia - Die alternative Enzyklopädie - Unterstützer-Kanal” (@Metapedia_Deutsch), 8,777 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Metapedia_Deutsch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.