Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -508. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,048–32,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 03:01
32,124
-180
17 Sept 2026, 11:58
32,304
-15
15 Sept 2026, 13:15
32,319
-33
13 Sept 2026, 21:18
32,352
-15
12 Sept 2026, 06:01
32,367
-5
9 Sept 2026, 20:42
32,372
-16
6 Sept 2026, 11:01
32,388
-14
4 Sept 2026, 01:02
32,402
-12
2 Sept 2026, 14:09
32,414
-11
1 Sept 2026, 16:27
32,425
-5
31 Aug 2026, 15:38
32,430
-1
30 Aug 2026, 16:16
32,431
-12
29 Aug 2026, 14:24
32,443
-12
28 Aug 2026, 14:06
32,455
-9
27 Aug 2026, 12:08
32,464
-10
26 Aug 2026, 15:32
32,474
-4
25 Aug 2026, 15:35
32,478
-3
24 Aug 2026, 14:25
32,481
-20
22 Aug 2026, 23:47
32,501
-16
21 Aug 2026, 10:16
32,517
first reading
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 32,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,770
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
141 (22 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
621,210
Reactions total
44,939
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,160
Videos
≈413
Links
≈1,670
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
42m 50s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77,451 reactions across 135 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
43,828
56.6%
❤
12,922
16.7%
👏
7,374
9.52%
🤬
5,843
7.54%
🔥
3,098
4.00%
😁
879
1.13%
🙈
733
0.946%
👎
679
0.877%
🙏
547
0.706%
😡
456
0.589%
👌
172
0.222%
😈
129
0.167%
🤯
107
0.138%
😭
98
0.127%
😱
67
0.087%
🏆
66
0.085%
😢
55
0.071%
🕊
53
0.068%
🤔
53
0.068%
🥰
49
0.063%
18 further kinds
243
0.314%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81,263 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Der Druck wirkt, die schwarz-rot-pinke Regierung musste nun in Sachen Spritpreise nachbessern. Aber nur zwölf Cent für zwei Monate reichen nicht. Solange die Verliererampel an der CO2-Steuer festhält, treibt sie die Tankrechnung selbst nach oben. Die österreichische Bevölkerung braucht eine dauerhafte Entlastung und keine Regierung, die sich für halbherzige Maßnahmen feiern lässt!
Endlich geht es wieder los! 🇦🇹
Wenn ich diese Schnappschüsse von unserer letzten Tour sehe, steigt die Vorfreude gleich noch einmal mehr. Dieses Wochenende starten wir unsere "WIR SIND FÜR EUCH DA"-Tour – und ich freue mich auf die vielen persönlichen Begegnungen mit euch. Denn genau das ist mir am wichtigsten: direkt bei den Menschen zu sein. Miteinander zu reden, zuzuhören und zu erfahren, was euch bewegt. Nicht a…
Keiner braucht einen Regenbogenzebrastreifen!
Mit einem Antrag zur Änderung der Straßenverkehrsordnung will unser Nationalratsabgeordneter Maximilian Weinzierl die Gestaltung von Schutzwegen neu regeln. Warum? Die Straßenverkehrsordnung dient der Sicherheit, Leichtigkeit und Flüssigkeit des Verkehrs und ist weder ein Instrument für Symbolpolitik noch ein Gestaltungsrahmen für gesellschaftliche Anliegen.
Fakt ist: Der…
Das muss jeder von EUCH wissen: Der Zwangsgebührenzahler wird mit der ORF-Haushaltsabgabe abgezockt, die Inflation steigt und der ORF gibt heute zigtausende Euros für eine Party aus!
Die AfD Sachsen-Anhalt will bis zum Ende des Jahres eine Regierungsbeteiligung möglich machen. Genau deshalb war sie bei uns in Wien, um wertvolle Erfahrungen und Wissen auszutauschen. 🇦🇹🇩🇪Denn eines verbindet uns: Wir lieben unsere Heimat. Wir wollen Verantwortung übernehmen und unsere Länder wieder auf den Weg des Erfolgs bringen.
🇦🇹🤝🇩🇪 Besuch aus Sachsen-Anhalt: Ulrich Siegmund war zu Gast bei mir im Büro und bei unserer Klubsitzung – und wir hatten einen wirklich guten und wertschätzenden Austausch.
Was uns verbindet? Die Liebe zu unserer Heimat und die Überzeugung, dass Politik wieder konsequent für die eigenen Bürger gemacht werden muss. Wir sind uns einig: Es braucht einen echten Systemwechsel und eine Politik, bei der die Menschen und ih…
Höhnisches Lachen, überhebliches Benehmen: Jugendkulturforscher Bernhard Heinzlmaier zuckte in der SevusTV-Sendung „Links. Rechts. Mitte“ wegen des pinken EU-Abgeordneten Helmut Brandstätter komplett aus.
Der Sieg der AfD in Sachsen-Anhalt, aber auch am Sonntag in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, ist ein demokratisches Machtwort des Souveräns, das weit über Deutschland hinaus zu spüren ist! Die Menschen holen sich ihr Land und ihre Heimat zurück!
Das abgehobene System der Eliten bröckelt an allen Ecken und Enden, weil die Bürger es nicht länger ertragen wollen. Die Zeit des Systemwechsels ist auch in Österreich gekommen. Dara…
Am Mittwoch steht wieder ein Sitzungstag im Nationalrat auf dem Programm – und auch diesmal werden wir diese Verlierer-Ampel nicht schonen. Wir starten hochmotiviert in den Herbst und werden nicht lockerlassen, wenn es um ein besseres Österreich geht. Was in dieser Woche geplant ist, seht ihr heute in einer Pressekonferenz. Sei dabei - ab 10:30 Uhr auf fpoe.at oder auf Facebook!
👍287❤29👏13👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @HKickl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Unser Bargeld ist in GEFAHR! Was ist eure Meinung dazu?
Es ist mir egal, ob mir das Bargeld weggenommen wird.0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Gerald Markel @gema1963 · 31,548 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
🇦🇹 Martin Rutter www.direktdemokratisch.jetzt @MartinRutter · 23,254 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
Stefan Magnet @stefanmagnet · 68,417 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
🔵 Martin Sellner [TELEGRAMELITE] @martinsellnerIB · 72,056 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
AUF1 @auf1tv · 273,431 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
MICHAEL WENDLER 🚨 & TEAM @michaelwendlerlive · 41,034 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
COMPACT-Magazin @CompactMagazin · 77,614 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Werner Altnickel, Lebenswerk (Offizieller Kanal) @WernerAltnickelAbsicherung · 20,544 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 September 2026
Ernst Wolff & andere ausgewählte Inhalte - Support Channel inofficial @ernstwolff · 21,934 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
Dr. Daniele Ganser @DanieleGanser · 73,800 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Wissen ist Macht offiziell @wissenistmacht1 · 33,536 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇩🇪/🇦🇹/🇨🇭 @ReinerFuellmich · 90,546 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
Tim K. @timmkellner · 204,661 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Ignaz Bearth offiziell @ignazbearth · 33,138 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
Ärzte für Aufklärung offiziell @aerztefueraufklaerungoffiziell · 79,893 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Corona_Fakten @Corona_Fakten · 48,419 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Nuoviso @Nuoviso · 51,885 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
RPP Institut - Offiziell @rppinstitut · 61,905 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Freie Medien @FreieMedienTV · 135,893 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Achtung, Reichelt! @AchtungReichelt · 21,610 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
OVALmedia | Deutsch @OVALmedia · 22,190 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Politik Spezial @PolitikSpezial · 26,823 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Prof.Dr.Stefan Hockertz Original Wissenschaft @ProfHockertz · 54,427 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Ernst Wolff @Wolff_Ernst · 21,952 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 69 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Herbert Kickl” (@HKickl), 32,124 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HKickl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.