Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🕊 Happiness is the way 🕊

Channel

🕊 Happiness is the way 🕊

@happinessismyway

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

48,118subscribers

-656 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001551606639
TypeChannel
Username@happinessismyway
DescriptionLebensfreude, Inspiration, Glück, Zufriedenheit, Wahrheitsfindung, darum geht’s hier
Created15 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/happinessismyway

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@udogrube/456831 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC@happinessismyway/6830 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@udogrube6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (51)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @udogrube. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

48,11848,77448,4466 August 2026 — 48,774 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,763 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,754 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,731 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,715 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,693 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,674 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,664 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,635 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,616 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,597 subscribers18 August 2026 — 48,586 subscribers19 August 2026 — 48,577 subscribers20 August 2026 — 48,571 subscribers21 August 2026 — 48,558 subscribers23 August 2026 — 48,537 subscribers24 August 2026 — 48,515 subscribers25 August 2026 — 48,514 subscribers26 August 2026 — 48,491 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,479 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,464 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,462 subscribers30 August 2026 — 48,454 subscribers31 August 2026 — 48,432 subscribers1 September 2026 — 48,408 subscribers2 September 2026 — 48,385 subscribers3 September 2026 — 48,357 subscribers5 September 2026 — 48,328 subscribers8 September 2026 — 48,283 subscribers11 September 2026 — 48,241 subscribers13 September 2026 — 48,209 subscribers15 September 2026 — 48,174 subscribers16 September 2026 — 48,150 subscribers19 September 2026 — 48,118 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -656. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,020–48,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:1848,118-32
16 Sept 2026, 19:5948,150-24
15 Sept 2026, 00:2148,174-35
13 Sept 2026, 06:5948,209-32
11 Sept 2026, 07:5948,241-42
8 Sept 2026, 10:2048,283-45
5 Sept 2026, 05:0048,328-29
3 Sept 2026, 13:0248,357-28
2 Sept 2026, 04:0148,385-23
1 Sept 2026, 06:2748,408-24
31 Aug 2026, 02:5248,432-22
30 Aug 2026, 05:5448,454-8
29 Aug 2026, 09:1548,462-2
28 Aug 2026, 12:2348,464-15
27 Aug 2026, 15:5348,479-12
26 Aug 2026, 19:0548,491-23
25 Aug 2026, 16:1348,514-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:2448,515-22
23 Aug 2026, 00:4448,537-21
21 Aug 2026, 11:2648,558first reading

Engagement

150 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 48,118 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,800
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 150 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held150 (31 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total1,256,270
Reactions total21,477
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 09:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,560
Videos
2,650
Links
1,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 34m
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 87 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36,386 reactions across 146 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,90621.7%
🤣7,89921.7%
💯3,4599.51%
3,2959.06%
👏2,6027.15%
😁2,0275.57%
🤡1,9275.30%
🤬1,8185.00%
🖕1,3813.80%
🙈1,1393.13%
🏆5681.56%
👎4431.22%
🔥2720.748%
🤩2350.646%
🤝2330.64%
🤔2060.566%
😱1980.544%
🤯1690.464%
🎉1290.355%
😈830.228%
13 further kinds3971.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,744 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC≈2,270 views82 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Hohe Spritpreise lässt einen auf Ideen kommen Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

🤣66💯12👍2🏆1🖕1

22 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC≈7,420 views100 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Der ist so geil… Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

🤔46🤣31🤯96🤡5🖕2🙈1

22 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC≈7,030 views72 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

⚠️ Wie du Cortisol vermeiden kannst und was du nicht vermeiden kannst 📌 Viele Menschen merken heute, dass etwas nicht mehr stimmt... Du isst, als würde dir jemand gleich den Teller wegnehmen Du greifst zum Handy, als wäre jeder Ton ein Notfallanruf Du wirst geweckt, als wäre es ein Feueralarm Du regst dich im Verkehr auf, ohne dass es schneller geht Du machst drei Dinge gleichzeitig und brauchst am Ende länger, als

41👍16👎6🖕4🤯2💯1🤔1😁1

22 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC≈7,550 views48 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @udogrube

Kennst du Murphys Gesetz? Wenn's einmal schiefläuft, kommt der Rest von allein. Gerade kann man das live beobachten: Wahlklatsche, verunglückte Rede, Strafanzeige — und am Wahlabend kam nur noch ein einziger Ministerpräsident ins Kanzleramt. Im neuen Video erkläre ich, wie diese Abwärtsspirale funktioniert — bei Merz und überall sonst. Und warum sie erst stoppt, wenn man selbst etwas ändert. 👉 zum Video

37👍7🖕4

21 Sept 2026, 14:53 UTC≈10,100 views384 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

So viel zum Thema Mathematik Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

🤣252👏70👍24🎉13💯136🆒3🤩2

21 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC≈9,240 views45 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

⏱️ 55 SEKUNDEN. DANACH WEISST DU, WARUM DEIN CORTISOL OBEN BLEIBT, OBWOHL DU NICHTS FALSCH MACHST. Du bist todmüde ins Bett. Vier Stunden später liegst du da, Kopf auf Hochtouren, Herz zu schnell. Gegen fünf schläfst du wieder ein. Um sieben klingelt der Wecker und du stehst auf wie gerädert. Das ist kein schlechter Schlaf. Das ist ein Messwert. ⏱️ Schau dir das Video oben an. 55 Sekunden, dann weißt du, warum. 🌡

👎2517🖕3

21 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC≈10,300 views262 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Nochmal Haha Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

🤣177🤩28🍾26🎉13💯7😁43😍3

21 Sept 2026, 11:38 UTC≈9,990 views194 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Haha Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

🤣149😁23🖕9👍53🤡3💯2

20 Sept 2026, 15:55 UTC≈11,200 views263 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Springt er oder springt er nicht Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

🤣173😁48🖕12🤡10🙏86🎉5🤯1

20 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC≈12,600 views356 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Ein bisschen Wahrheit zum Sonntag Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

👍259🏆38💯27👏189🙏3🖕2

20 Sept 2026, 09:52 UTC≈66,800 views400 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Mathematik hilft Folge uns! Mit Humor und Happiness zur Wahrheit 👉 @happinessismyway

👍199😁93💯58🤣19🏆167😱3👏2

20 Sept 2026, 07:13 UTC≈11,000 views79 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

🚨 DIESE GLYPHOSAT-PRÜFUNG SCHRIEB DER HERSTELLER SELBST. 📄 Der Bericht, auf dem die europäische Zulassung aufbaut, kam aus Deutschland. Ein Plagiatsgutachten verglich ihn mit dem Antrag der Hersteller. Im Kapitel zur Erbgutschädigung waren rund 94% wörtlich identisch. Geprüft hat nicht die Behörde. Geprüft hat der Hersteller sich selbst. ⚠️ Und die EFSA räumt 2023 ein, es gebe „keine international vereinbarten Lei

47👍20👎3🖕3😱3😁2🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @happinessismyway. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

🕊 Udo Grube 🕊
@udogrube · 3,266
13 posts
Aachen Doku
@AachenDoku · 128
4 posts
Augenzucker
@Augenzucker · 41
2 posts
Gegenteilwelt Memes
@Gegenteilwelt · 11
2 posts
❤️⬛️⬜️🟥 Gabriele Curschmann-Käsinger
@curschmann_kaesinger · 8,497
2 posts
APatzwahl
@APatzwahl · 97
1 post
Alles Ausser Mainstream
@AllesAusserMainstream · 109,625
1 post
Anti-Spiegel - Offizieller Kanal
@AntiSpiegel · 122,585
1 post
Freie Medien
@FreieMedienTV · 136,161
1 post
🕊Freiheit der Gedanken🕊
@FreiheitDerGedanken · 74,962
1 post
Gender-Wahnnsinn #IchLasseMichNichtWOKEN
@IchLasseMichNichtWOKEN · 58
1 post
WAHRHEIT GESUCHT!
@ImpulsgeberRobertPlucinsky · 253
1 post
Alfredo's Plauderecke
@Plaudereckle · 53
1 post
Qlobal-Change 🫂
@QlobalChange · 93,501
1 post
Reiner Fuellmich 🇩🇪/🇦🇹/🇨🇭
@ReinerFuellmich · 90,546
1 post
Sandy 😊
@Sandy_lacht · 18
1 post
Wir sind nicht krank!
@Wirsindnichtkrank · 34
1 post
Achtung Satire!
@achtung_satire · 1
1 post
ASP🇨🇭
@alleschweizerpetitionen · 74
1 post
ATV - Alternative Medien die du so nicht erwarten würdest!
@atvneu · 93
1 post
BÜNDNIS21 Info-Kanal
@buendnis21 · 56
1 post
DasBesteKommtNoch
@dasbestekommtnoch · 5
1 post
exspiner
@exspiner · 1,911
1 post
Shipi
@fedfs · 9,858
1 post
Widerstandskraft steigern - forum-rosal.ch
@frWiderstandskraft · 66
1 post
FrankySnatra's Perspektive
@franky_snatras_news · 279
1 post
Freedom is ours .... Margit Mayras Wake Up Channel
@freedom333999 · 188
1 post
freidenken.org
@freidenkenPUNKTorg · 574
1 post
Freiheitsboten_fribourg_info
@freiheitsboten_fribourg_info · 56
1 post
Schloß Neuhaus steht auf
@hier_lang · 95
1 post
Thomas Eglinski Info-Kanal
@infothomaseglinski · 942
1 post
🌍KALA News
@kalasnews · 36
1 post
1bis19 Südwest (Veranstalter vom Mainzer Maskenzug.de)
@maskenzug · 75
1 post
Recht und Wahrheit
@meinolfschoenborn · 1,204
1 post
peter's coffee corner
@peters_coffee_corner · 2
1 post
🕊Q ANONYMOUS KANAL DEUTSCHesLAND️ 🌍 USA Patriots United
@q_anonymous_kanal_deutschland · 16,073
1 post
Querdenken_4484 (Hude)
@querdenken_4484 · 38
1 post
Roger Waters Berlin
@rogerwatersberlin · 71
1 post
SHAEF FAKTEN
@shaeffakten · 174
1 post
Selbstheilung Online
@sho_gesund · 5,506
1 post
Spiritualwiki AHA-Zitate
@spiritualwiki_zitate · 546
1 post
Zukunftsrunde | INFO
@zukunftsrunde_info · 205
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 55 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

▫️Rechtsanwältin Beate Bahner
@rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahner · 82,818
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Alles Ausser Mainstream
@AllesAusserMainstream · 109,625
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Freie Medien
@FreieMedienTV · 136,161
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
️ Silke Schaefer Astrologie Offiziell
@silkeschaefer · 121,520
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Chlordioxid
@Chlordioxid · 81,624
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
reitschuster.de
@reitschusterde · 207,481
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
RABBIT RESEARCH
@rabbitresearch · 83,503
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
LION Media TV
@LIONMediaTV · 104,448
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Anti-Spiegel - Offizieller Kanal
@AntiSpiegel · 122,585
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
AUF1
@auf1tv · 273,431
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Tim K.
@timmkellner · 205,156
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Ken Jebsen - Aufklärung und Information
@kenjebsen · 123,304
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

9 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

ght-med.com4 posts · 2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post
youtu.be3 posts · 31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post
alpha-energy.at1 post · 4 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
shop.alps-pure.comregistrable domain: alps-pure.com1 post · 3 August 2026 – 3 August 2026 · example post
eservice.auvesta.comregistrable domain: auvesta.com1 post · 5 August 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post
biorelax.de1 post · 2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post
www.google.comregistrable domain: google.com1 post · 2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post
www.smithsonianmag.comregistrable domain: smithsonianmag.com1 post · 4 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
www.iarc.who.intregistrable domain: who.int1 post · 4 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🕊 Happiness is the way 🕊” (@happinessismyway), 48,118 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happinessismyway.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.