Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Politische Bilder 😇

@PolitischeBilder

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

69,772subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001260837623
TypeChannel
Username@PolitischeBilder
Description✅ Politisch inkorrekte Memes, Cartoons, Karikaturen, widersprüchliche Nachrichten ✅ Klasse statt Masse, keine Zensur ✅ Wir führen auch die Kanäle: @Politische_Nachrichten 🗞 @cuteandfunvideos 🥰 ✅ Zum Kontaktieren den Bot benutzen: @PolitischeBilderBot
Created21 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PolitischeBilder

Growth

69,77269,86669,8196 August 2026 — 69,862 subscribers6 August 2026 — 69,866 subscribers7 August 2026 — 69,855 subscribers8 August 2026 — 69,842 subscribers9 August 2026 — 69,816 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69,806 subscribers12 August 2026 — 69,798 subscribers13 August 2026 — 69,789 subscribers14 August 2026 — 69,772 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,758–69,880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:3769,772-17
13 Aug 2026, 00:5269,789-9
12 Aug 2026, 01:2269,798-8
10 Aug 2026, 23:2769,806-10
9 Aug 2026, 20:1269,816-26
8 Aug 2026, 16:5369,842-13
7 Aug 2026, 19:0569,855-11
6 Aug 2026, 17:3169,866+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:3169,862first reading

Engagement

233 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 69,772 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,510
232 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
233
of 233 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held233 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total1,741,540
Reactions total53,383
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
71,600
Videos
1,350
Links
27,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 37s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48,398 reactions across 212 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣13,26727.4%
💯12,24525.3%
👍6,88614.2%
🤬3,2506.72%
😁2,9316.06%
🏆1,7953.71%
🤡1,5613.23%
😈1,2052.49%
9922.05%
🔥7041.45%
🤪6301.30%
👎6101.26%
😢4480.926%
🌭4230.874%
🍌3540.731%
🦄2350.486%
👻1890.391%
🤷‍♂1650.341%
🎉1570.324%
🤔1480.306%
7 further kinds2030.419%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 233 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,383reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 233 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 232 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PolitischeBilder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 233 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈5,260 views80 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

😈42💯22🍌6🏆4🔥3👍21

14 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈5,220 views215 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

😢127👎61😈11🤬63🤷‍♂3🦄3🤡1

14 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈5,130 views168 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

🤣143🏆7🔥5👎3💯3🤬32😢2

14 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈5,010 views155 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

🤣141🏆9👎4😈1

14 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈5,880 views111 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

👍43🤣34💯17👎73🏆3🤷‍♂3🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈5,950 views91 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

👍72🏆7🤣73👎1🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈5,700 views158 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

👻85😁54🏆11😈52👍1

14 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈5,760 views168 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

👍66💯44🤣31😁12🏆6🎉5🤬21

14 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈7,230 views414 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

👍289💯92🤡1610👻3🍌2👎2

14 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈7,370 views383 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

🤬283😈47💯38🔥84🤣3

14 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈6,970 views150 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

😁94🏆399💯5👎3

14 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈6,960 views196 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

😁95💯78👍16🏆61

Showing the 12 most recent of 233 posts we hold for @PolitischeBilder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTCAnonymous Poll1,540 voters approx.

Glaubst du, dass Anthony Fauci wegen seiner Rolle bei der Coronaforschung / als NIAID-Leiter und nach seiner Aussage vor dem Kongress (wo er über 100 Mal den 5. Zusatzartikel gezogen hat) bestraft wird (z.b. ins Gefängnis kommt)?

  1. Ja, definitiv – er kommt hinter Gitter13%
  2. Eher ja – es wird ernsthafte Konsequenzen geben8%
  3. Eher nein – er kommt mit einer Begnadigung oder Verfahrensfehlern davon35%
  4. Nein, er ist unantastbar / zu gut abgesichert37%
  5. Weiß nicht / Keine klare Meinung6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 233 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,457 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Festung Europa
@festung_europa · 10
12 posts
KACHELKANAL
@kachelkanal · 19,644
9 posts
Daniel Gugger 888
@danielgugger888 · 424
7 posts
Freunde der Freiheit und Wahrheit
@GerdJan · 116
5 posts
Politisch Korrekt
@polko1 · 26
5 posts
Dein Schwurbelfreund
@schwurbelfreund · 36
5 posts
Alternative NEWS
@AlternatNews · 11
4 posts
Jürgen Pohl — Der Volksanwalt
@juergenpohlafd · 445
4 posts
Thomas Rettig
@RettigThomas · 7
4 posts
APO Traunreut
@apotrt · 25
3 posts
DD-Bilder-Zone
@dd_bilder_zone · 70
2 posts
Enno Gnob
@ennognobofficial · 39
2 posts
Gesunde Aufklärung
@gesunde_aufklaerung · 24
2 posts
Hawey
@Hawey01 · 4
2 posts
Selbstdenker
@meyerdaniel · 4
2 posts
Nebenbeibemerkt
@nebenbeibemerkt · 33
2 posts
Pivo
@pivobrun · 3
2 posts
Propaganda-Melder Reloaded
@Propagandamelder_Reloaded · 92
2 posts
Selbstdenker
@qanonbayern · 43
2 posts
Reinhard Leube öffentlich
@reinhard_leube · 30
2 posts
Aufkleber
@vieleaufkleber · 1
2 posts
WEITBLICK
@weit_blick · 130
2 posts
🔵 Info TV 🇩🇪🔵
@AFLepton · 156
1 post
altamira_auslese
@altamira_auslese · 46
1 post
Arnies Nachrichten - und News Sammlung 🕵️‍♂️
@ArniesNews · 215
1 post
Aufwachen
@aufwachen · 6,542
1 post
Augenöffner Heilkunde
@Augenprobleme · 29
1 post
Bewegung Freies Leipzig
@BewegungFreiesLeipzig · 97
1 post
Bismarcks Alpträume
@BismarcksAlptraume · 25,130
1 post
Bockbär
@Bockbaer · 18
1 post
Computerservice.arminfischer.com 📣💻📲 Channel
@Computerservicearminfischercom · 12
1 post
Verbales Vitriol (Dr. Sabine Stebel)
@DrBines_verbales_Vitriol · 8,058
1 post
⚡Elementarwaechter🌤
@Elementarwaechter · 28
1 post
ESmogChip
@esmogchip · 8
1 post
Gerhard Müller
@gerhardmuellermusic · 349
1 post
Die "GRÜNE PEST"!🤮
@gruenpe · 33
1 post
Heimat Franken
@heimat_franken · 65
1 post
Hockenberries :: :: :
@hockenberries · 668
1 post
Laughing is Living
@lachma · 167
1 post
jetzt oder nie
@lebendigermann · 15
1 post
Leun wacht auf
@leun_wacht_auf · 127
1 post
MEINE D-NEWS 🇩🇪 🇦🇹 🇨🇭
@MeineDNEWS · 56,202
1 post
Recht und Wahrheit
@meinolfschoenborn · 1,161
1 post
Meme World & Fun
@Memeworldandfun · 327
1 post
Mixed Pickles
@mixed_pickles · 210
1 post
Node of Time DE
@node_of_time_DE · 39,516
1 post
Gesundheitswesen CH ungeimpft - wie weiter?
@pflegepersonalSchweizBerichte · 3,818
1 post
9/11 The Inside Job
@the_inside_job_9_11 · 26
1 post
❌Tommy_aus_Grimma ❌
@tktommy · 124
1 post
Tommy Positiv - 𝗞𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝘁 𝗞𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗸𝗹𝗮𝘁𝘀𝗰𝗵
@tommypositiv · 13,856
1 post
Trustchecker
@trustchecker · 20
1 post
Green turtle
@turtle_gre · 44
1 post
Unge*mpfte A....löcher
@Unge_mpfte_Arschloecher · 13
1 post
Der unendliche 😷 Wahnsinn 🥳 🤪
@Wahn2020 · 65
1 post
WIR2020PARTEI
@WIR2020_offiziell · 649
1 post
World Wide Ignorance
@WorldwideIgnorancie · 5
1 post
Alte Frau
@yt_alte_frau · 68
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 71 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tim K.
@timmkellner · 207,455
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
MARKmobil
@MARKmobil · 117,545
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Anti-Spiegel - Offizieller Kanal
@AntiSpiegel · 123,157
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Ken Jebsen - Aufklärung und Information
@kenjebsen · 124,359
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
reitschuster.de
@reitschusterde · 209,321
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Oliver Janich & Team
@oliverjanich · 108,568
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Neues aus Russland 🪆📢 Alina Lipp
@neuesausrussland · 163,812
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Alles Ausser Mainstream
@AllesAusserMainstream · 110,570
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Freie Medien
@FreieMedienTV · 137,255
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Eva Herman Offiziell
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 190,393
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
LION Media
@LIONMediaNews · 135,175
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Freie Sachsen
@freiesachsen · 110,790
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
AUF1
@auf1tv · 275,068
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Politische Bilder 😇” (@PolitischeBilder), 69,772 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PolitischeBilder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.