Channel
@flensburg_waehlen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001691126627 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flensburg_waehlen |
| Description | Der offizielle Kanal unserer Ratsfraktion. Hier erfahrt ihr alles über unsere Arbeit im Stadtrat und den Ausschüssen |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flensburg_waehlen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 17 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 17 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2024 to 6 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hallo, ihr Lieben! 🍀In FL Tageblatt gab‘s am Samstag einen großen Artikel über Monster - Projekt „Hafen - Ost“. Auf Grund dessen hören unsere Stadtentwickler vielleicht auf, unsere Steuergelder aus dem Fenster zu schmeißen und überdenken endlich Mal das Ganze!? 🤷♀️
https://youtube.com/shorts/xV1Bmlz0ydU?si=PtHQoC8x-daRK2WW
https://youtu.be/DCggXYhkjtI?si=BUbaIYHKRnU1z6iL
https://youtube.com/shorts/RWaXdh7k8LM?si=peNUIsBFwKdvLVAS
В Дании 17-летнюю датчанку будут судить за то, что она отбилась от насильника-мигранта с помощью перцового балончика. Грубо нарушив права мигранта на половое удовлетворение. Маразм крепчает... 💣 @Mikle1On
Photo, posted without a caption
Wagenknecht-Partei will Bürger-Veto gegen Gesetze einführen💥 Die Partei Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) hat in ihrem Wahlprogramm für die kommenden Landtagswahlen in Thüringen mehr direkte Demokratie gefordert. Dazu gehöre, „dass Volksbegehren künftig auch über Fragen entscheiden sollen, die mit finanziellen Auswirkungen verbunden sind. Das sogenannte Finanztabu muss fallen“, heißt es in dem Programm, das dem Spiege…
❗💥📹NAZIS ??!!!ICH BIN ECHT WÜTEND !!Herr Klingbeil das wird Konsequenzen haben …!! TEILEN Folgt mir auf Telegram/Hauptkanal ↕️↕️↕️ https://t.me/Kampf_fuer_unsere_Zukunft Chat-Kanal ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/IavYc2SRFdY1OGY6
„Diese Wahl war ein Misstrauensvotum gegenüber der neosozialistischen Bundesregierung und dem Experiment einer Deindustrialisierung und Verarmung der Bevölkerung. Die Menschen haben begriffen, dass vor allem die extremistische Partei Bündnis 90/Die Grünen dafür verantwortlich… https://t.co/OSlafcjuSZ — Hans-Georg Maaßen (@HGMaassen) Jun 10, 2024 June 11, 2024 at 12:10AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/HGMaassen @HG…
Hallo, liebe Mitstreiter, liebe Freunde! ☀️Eine Möglichkeit uns mal wieder zu treffen: zum Austauschen, ein neues Konzept zu besprechen, neue Ideen und Vorschläge zu sammeln… Wo und wann ? => Sommerfest auf dem Stadion, am Sonntag, den 23. Juni. Ab 11 Uhr findet ihr uns im Zelt A. Für Kinder, Speis und Trank ist gesorgt. Wir freuen uns auf euch! 🍀❤️
Das ist Bullshit! Der 4+2 Vertrag ist NULL UND NICHTIG! Präsident Putin, muss ihn gar nicht kündigen ‼️ Versteht das endlich! #WannWachtIhrAuf
Oh Oh Wir alle wissen, dass denen die Soldaten egal sind. Denen waren die Soldaten die letzten Jahrezehnte schon völlig schnuppe und jetzt auf einmal gibt es einen Veteranentag? Wir alle wissen warum. Man schwört uns ein, auf Krieg. Da will ich auch gar keine Skandal- oder Paniktrommel rühren, aber wenn seit Monaten in allen möglichen Formen und Arten unterschwellig die Zivilbevölkerung auf militärische Auseinander…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @flensburg_waehlen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Flensburg WÄHLEN! Offiziell” (@flensburg_waehlen), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flensburg_waehlen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.