Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ботя

@call_botya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

967subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275740139
TypeChannel
Username@call_botya
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/call_botya

Growth

967968967.56 August 2026 — 968 subscribers7 August 2026 — 968 subscribers14 August 2026 — 967 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 967–968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:26967-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:02968no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:55968first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.6%
avg views ÷ 967 subscribers
Avg views / post
683
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,148
Reactions total194
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

417 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11427.3%
8921.3%
😢7217.3%
😁5713.7%
🤔317.43%
🔥296.95%
👏184.32%
👎71.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 417reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC256 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот не могу понять: откуда в некоторых бабах такая огромная тяга к стяжательству? Сейчас нахожусь в Приэльбрусье, гуляю по горам. Тут национальный парк. Прямо покупаешь билет, чтобы гулять в его пределах. Официально. Без билета не пройдёшь. И вот - одна! Вот - другая! Третья! Старая, молодая... Суки, рвут цветы! Нельзя просто походить по национальному парку, полюбоваться, подышать, погулять. Надо обязательно урват

👍8😢72

Signed Максим Слепов

2 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC552 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А в Евросоюзе назревает революция сверху, что ли? В заморскую африканскую (!!) микроскопическую территорию Испании прорвалось какое-то количество африканцев же. И вдруг самое высокое начальство запело о разрыве Шенгена якобы из-за угрозы... Чего???! Если кто давно не был в Испании: там на юге, в Андалуссии уже добрая треть населения - марроканцы. Или вот наплыв беженцев из Сирии на Германию в 2015-16 гг - счёт шёл

🤔92

Signed Максим Слепов

2 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC531 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Соседство этих двух новостей в моей ленте не даёт мне покоя OpenAI выявила «побег» еще нескольких ИИ-агентов из тестовых сред, пишет Reuters со ссылкой на источники. И МВД Испании заявило, что усилит контроль на границах и примет меры в ответ на приток мигрантов в Сеуту... Поводом стал резкий наплыв мигрантов в испанский анклав Сеута: десятки тысяч человек пересекли границу с Марокко, в том числе вплавь, что приве

😁12

Signed Максим Слепов

30 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC651 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Шёл сегодня Цветным бульваром где-то после обеда. Везде цветочки, ротондочки, галереи. Вот деревянные лежаки, уставшие от лета москвичи возлежат на них, подставляя свои Ray Ban'ы июльскому солнышку. Вот нарядный пуделёк в цветастой манишке ведёт свою хозяйку. Проходим дальше, видим летнюю театральную сцену. Репетируют вечерний спектакль. Дальше, подле "Современника", взрослым преподают азы циркового искусства: таре

27🔥7👍3😁1

Signed Максим Слепов

29 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC678 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ответ на разгром инфраструктуры крупнейшего в стране ритейлера и на прилёты крылатых ракет по оборонным предприятиям вглубь России не заставил себя ждать! https://t.me/bbbreaking/234515

👏14😁6🔥4😢2👎1

Signed Максим Слепов

26 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC937 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я сам, в силу убеждений, ко всяким национализмам не очень. Но вот попался на глаза блестящий текст, который в этой системе отношений описывает очень многое. Тем более сейчас полмира одурманено националистическим шмурдяком, кругом войны и упадок. Надо бы знать предмет. ...Так вот, (русский) режиссёр начал ставить спектакль в эстонском драматическом театре, и у него всё пошло хорошо. Главную роль играла уже немолодая,

👍13🤔65👎3😁2🔥1

Signed Максим Слепов

18 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC830 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья! С некоторых пор я занимаюсь менторингом, помогаю людям и командам в их развитии и улучшении производственной деятельности. Делюсь с вами ссылкой на свой профиль на GetMentor: https://getmentor.dev/mentor/maksim-slepov-6792 Зоны моей экспертизы - people management, project management, улучшение процессов на уровне команд и отделов. Выслушаю, задам вопросы, поделюсь своими знаниями. Поучаствую в собеседовании

👍93🔥1🤔1

Signed Максим Слепов

16 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC854 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Удивительное. Все помнят прекрасный фильм "1+1", я думаю. Там парализованный богач на каталке, у которого остался только голос, чтобы давать приказания слуге. Сейчас в мире идёт какая-то страшная шиза про голосовое управление. В автомобилях всё больше функций на голосовые помощники. Смартфоны проектируют под голосовое управление. В некоторых "умных" домах кнопок выключателей не делают, всё надо включать приказаниями

👍187🔥2😢2

Signed Максим Слепов

15 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC859 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Господа, какая туалетная вода! Только ди-хло-фос! https://t.me/bbbreaking/233578

😁142

Signed Максим Слепов

14 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,000 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сделано у нас На дворе 2026 год, значит, можно подвести промежуточные итоги под проектом импортозамещения в авиации, одном из самых громких проектов. Помню, я даже немножко верил в это в 2022 году: действительно, кое-какие производственные мощности остались. Потребность летать никуда не исчезла. Буржуи перекрыли крантик полностью. Для военных промышленность что-то выпускает. Значит, можно просто взять и сделать у н

😢10👍4🤔1

Signed Максим Слепов

14 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC700 viewsread 7 August 2026

Друзья! Решил завести отдельный канал, посвящённый спорту в моей жизни. Кому интересно про бег, про бокс, про митохондрии и прочее - добро пожаловать сюда! https://telegram.me/sportslon Комментарии открыты, можно делиться своим опытом, а также показывать автору, насколько он неправ.

Signed Максим Слепов

13 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC718 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как испортить медицину просто так Тяжёлый разговор о менеджменте в медицине. Поводов несколько. Во-первых, сам сейчас прохожу исследование в платной поликлинике по страховке от работодателя (это важно). Во-вторых, на глаза попался полный отчаяния пост уже бывшего заведующего отделения нашей горбольницы - https://t.me/lorspec/381. Врач это был хорошо известен и в городе, и за городом. К нему стремились попасть. Тепе

🤔138🔥7👍4👏1

Signed Максим Слепов

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @call_botya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 966,224 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ботя” (@call_botya), 967 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/call_botya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.