🇷🇺 Jazero Gižgit Dnes je jazero Gižgit považované za jedno z najkrajších miest v republike Kabardino-Balkaria, hoci jeho vznik nie je prírodný. Vodná nádrž vznikla v polovici 20. storočia ako usadzovacia nádrž tyrnyauzského bansko-zpracovateľského kombinátu. Tu sa hromadili odpadové produkty po spracovaní rudy obsahujúcej wolfram a molybdén. Po ukončení prevádzky sa táto oblasť postupne zmenila a jazero získalo sv…
Channel
Cactus Bielli
@cactus_bielli
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,580subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001479286242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cactus_bielli |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cactus_bielli |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1,580 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 1,581 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 1,583 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,584 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 1,584 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.56%
- avg views ÷ 1,580 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 24.6
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.29%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 271 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 12s
- Average length
- 1m 07s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 4 | 44.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇻🇳🤡🇸🇰 „Toto je klasické kruhová križovatka, vietnamského typu. Je to pohodlné pre vodičov. Tu je celá časť vyhradená pre vás, ale aj tak niekto ide v protismeru.“ Rus zrozumiteľne vysvetlil, ako fungujú dopravné pravidlá a bezpečnosť na cestách v Nha Trangu.
🇺🇸👽🛸 Nové "mimozemské zábery" od Pentagonu – na oblohe na Blízkom východe bol zaznamenaný neznámy lietajúci objekt. Záznam pochádza z roku 2025. Ukazuje biely bod, ktorý sa pohybuje v oblasti obytnej zóny, ale presná lokalita nie je uvedená. Od 8. mája americké úrady začali publikovať sľúbené dokumenty o UFO, ktoré sľúbil Donald Trump. Vyzerá to ako UFO? Áno, tentokrát je tam niečo – 😁 Je to len chyba kamery – 🤔
❗️🇺🇸🐻 Nenechávajte poklop otvorený – turisti v USA našli medveďov vo svojom aute: V štáte Tennessee sa turisti prebudili kvôli neočakávanej návšteve – medvedica s mláďatkom sa dostali do zaparkovaného auta a začali prehľadávať interiér v snahe nájsť jedlo.
‼️🇷🇺💥🇺🇦 Obsadenie Aniskina a situácia na Záporožskom fronte. Súhrn za 7. augusta 2026.
‼️🇷🇺🤜🇺🇦🇨🇴 El Día de los Muertos...No, pomohli týmto kolumbijským "habanero-kobalejrom" od "čubatých" náborových agentúr niečím? Zdá sa, že nie. Navyše, po podpise zmluvy s ukrajinskými ozbrojenými silami im nepomáhajú na fronte ani zložené zbrane, ani zdvihnuté ruky ✋🤚. Žijúc vo svojich latinskoamerických krajinách, ani netušili, aký pekelný život ich čaká na frontoch krajiny 404. A o tom by mali... veľmi by mali pre…
👍2
❗️🇮🇷🤜🇮🇱🇺🇸 Iránu sa podarilo získať takmer nepoškodené americké bezpilotné lietadlá MQ-9 Reaper a izraelské modely Hermes 900. Očakáva sa, že inžinieri KSIR preskúmajú získané systémy, študujú ich technológie a vykonajú reverzné inžinierstvo kľúčových komponentov s cieľom vyvinúť pokročilé modely bezpilotných lietadiel vlastnej výroby.
👏1
‼️🇪🇸🔥🇲🇦 Do španielskej Ceuty sa migranti snažia dostať nielen po vode, ale aj vzduchom. Občan Maroka sa pokúsil prekročiť hranicu na padáku. Zrazilo ho do vody neďaleko hraníc – španielski príslušníci civilnej gardy ho vytiahli, ale nepodarilo sa im ho oživiť.
😁1
🇹🇭💥 V Thajsku došlo k streľbe v škole: jeden zo žiakov začal strielať na žiakov a zamestnancov. Podľa najnovších informácií, osem ľudí prišlo o život a ďalších pätnásť utrpelo zranenia.
😱1
🇪🇸🔥 Boj o taco: Stovky hladných Európanov dobyli reštauráciu v Barcelone, aby si mohli kúpiť mexické wrapy za 1 euro. Európa-2026: záverečné zhodnotenie.
😁1
‼️🇵🇱🤜🇺🇦 Útoky na Ukrajincov v Poľsku sa stupňujú, momentálne je to len začiatok, – bývalý minister zahraničných vecí Kuleba.
😁2💩1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @cactus_bielli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 739,001 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cactus Bielli” (@cactus_bielli), 1,580 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cactus_bielli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.