4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,503–1,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 01:22
1,504
-5
14 Aug 2026, 15:16
1,509
-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:45
1,510
no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:32
1,510
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.34%
avg views ÷ 1,504 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
19 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,255
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
66.7%
👍
3
33.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
العام الذي مات فيه أبو طالب عم النبي ونصيره، وماتت فيه خديجة زوجه ومعينه وسماه بعض علماء السير عام الحزن= هو نفس العام الذي دخل فيه رسول الله على زوجته سودة وعقد على زوجته عائشة وأسري به إلى بيت المقدس وعرج به إلى السموات العلى.
موج الحياة يضع ويرفع، لكن المهم أنك هنا، تصيبك ضراء فتصبر لها، وينعم الله عليك بسراء فتشكرها، مستمر في السعي والعمل والاستجابة، تؤدي الذي عليك، والجنة مستراح العابدين.
أفضل أيامك لا بد أن ي…
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 🌿
نُعلن عن فتح بابِ التسجيل في برنامج «بسملة» في أولى دفعاته.
وهو عبارة عن مجالس علمية تأسيسية للمبتدئين في عشرة علوم شرعية: عقيدة وآداب وفقه وتجويد وتفسير وحديث وسيرة وتزكية ونحو وأدب، مع مسار تعبدي عملي يقوم على أوراد التلاوة والذكر وتدريب عملي على ختمة استهداء تامّة.
🔗 ولمزيد تفصيل، يُرجى مطالعة الملف التعريفي للبرنامج
🔖 دونكم رابط التسجيل: https://forms.gle/6ii8aborNdBu7qS66
📩 في حال …
للمرة الثانية وبعد أكثر من نصف مليون مشترك..
قرر يوتيوب فجأة إغلاق قناة #رواسخ وحذف محتواها دون إنذار أو تحذير مسبق! ⚠️
ما زلنا مستمرين في أداء رسالتنا وتقديم محتوى عميق يليق بكم.
شاركونا الدعم والمساهمة في نشر المحتوى، وانتظروا مفاجآت قوية قادمة.. ⏳
مراتب التسليم والانقياد للنصوص الشرعية:
قال تعالى: ﴿فلا وربك لا يؤمنون حتى يحكموك فيما شجر بينهم ثم لا يجدوا في أنفسهم حرجا مما قضيت ويسلموا تسليما﴾.
قال ابن القيم: (فهذه ثلاث مراتب: التحكيم، وسعة الصدر بانتفاء الحرج، والتسليم).
لو استقبلت من أمري ما استدبرت لقررت أن برامج تقريب العلوم وتيسيرها ينبغي أن تكون على ثلاث رتب:
الرتبة الأولى: ما لا يسع المسلم جهله؛ وهذه تكون لها الدعوة واسعة، ويرغّب لها الناس، ويحثون عليها، وترفع أصوات التنادي لها.
الرتبة الثانية: فروض الكفايات؛ وتكون الدعوة لها علنية دون عبارات تسويقية تشعر المرء بأنه سيصبح عالمًا، أو تخوفه من ترك هذا المقام الذي قد لا يجب عليه، مع تحديد الفئة المستهدفة بوضوح.
الرتبة الثالثة: الد…
••
يشكو الناسُ النسيانَ ويعدُّونه نقصًا في التركيب، وهو من أخفى الرحمات؛ إذ لو بقيَ الألمُ في الذاكرةِ بحرارتِه الأولى ما قامَ لبني آدمَ سوق، ولا احتملَ زوجٌ زوجَه، ولا صافحَ أخٌ أخاه. فأكثرُ ما يُبقي العِشرةَ بين الناسِ ضعفُ الحفظِ فيهم، لا سَعةُ الصدور.
••
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yousof_sabik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 968,783 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مستر انجليزى @mrmostafaawad · 106,326 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
قناة أمجد سمير @amgadsamir · 196,354 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
دورات تدبر القرآن لمهندس علاء حامد💡 @tdburalquran · 236,051 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
قطوف - علّموا الناس الخير @Qutooff · 104,822 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“يوسف سابق” (@yousof_sabik), 1,504 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yousof_sabik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
