Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Starter - Official Announcements Channel

@starter_announcements

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,263subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001457239909
TypeChannel
Username@starter_announcements
Created26 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/starter_announcements

Growth

3,2633,2783,270.56 August 2026 — 3,276 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,276 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,278 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,273 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,263 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,261–3,280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:083,263-10
10 Aug 2026, 20:513,273-5
7 Aug 2026, 12:283,278+2
6 Aug 2026, 23:003,276no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:543,276first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3742.0%
2225.0%
😁1517.0%
👏33.41%
😘33.41%
🥰33.41%
😍22.27%
11.14%
👍11.14%
🤓11.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Mar 2026, 13:26 UTC870 viewsread 7 August 2026

HANDL Investors Claim instructions and key links are on this tweet here: https://x.com/HandlPay/status/2036757636394189114 Send any queries to their community channel linked here and they'll be able to sort things out for you! https://t.me/handlpay Let's go BUIDLer's!

23 Mar 2026, 09:10 UTC599 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

HANDL is listing March 25. Make sure you register to claim your TGE unlock. Register within the next 24 hours and you’ll also unlock pre-staking options. Don’t miss it.👇 https://registrations.handlpay.com

🔥2👏1

23 Mar 2026, 08:56 UTC495 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ATTN: all $HANDL investors and launchpad participants The listing is happening on March 25 and you must register to claim your $HANDL allocation available at TGE/Listing Unlock. On March 22 at 1pm UTC, the portal where you can pre-register your $HANDL claim will go live. (Link in the comments). You have 2 days to register and pre-stake your allocation. The more you pre-stake, the higher the return Conviction Bon

👏21

18 Mar 2026, 18:13 UTC473 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It's time for another Based Spaces 🎙 Based Spaces #59: SEC Regulation, War & The AI Arms Race Regulation just shifted. The world’s heating up. AI isn’t slowing down. 🗓 Thursday, March 19 ⏰ 3PM UTC 📍 https://x.com/i/spaces/1oJMvRQzdzWxQ Pull up.

🔥3😁2

5 Mar 2026, 00:12 UTC578 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Back for another Based Spaces 🎙 Based Spaces #58: Markets, Global Tensions & The AI Takeover Global tensions are rising. AI is moving faster than anyone’s comfortable with. 🗓 Thursday, March 5 ⏰ 3PM UTC 📍 https://x.com/i/spaces/1aKbdbEQgbrJX See you there.

🔥3😁1😍1

11 Feb 2026, 16:46 UTC674 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

We’re excited to announce our strategic partnership with GEMS.vip to support larger private and ICO raises. By combining Starter’s launch experience and community activation with GEMS’ fundraising infrastructure, we’re expanding what founders and our community can access. This collaboration opens the door to bigger raises, stronger distribution, and new earning opportunities for our ecosystem. More joint initiativ

🔥61😁1

5 Feb 2026, 03:58 UTC520 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Back for another Based Spaces 🎙 Based Spaces #57: Market Crash, Next Narrative, Hopium Red everywhere. Narratives shifting. So what’s actually next? 🗓 Thursday, February 5 ⏰ 3PM UTC Set your reminder + join here: https://x.com/i/spaces/1PlKQObYarBJE Who’s pulling up? 🔥

2🔥2🥰1

26 Jan 2026, 15:39 UTC614 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Starter’s first private sale with GEMS.vip is now live, starting with TIGA, a meme-powered iGaming project built on real casino revenue. 🐯 TIGA connects meme culture with a live gambling ecosystem, where $TIGA unlocks higher cashback, staking rewards, and onchain buybacks. The casino is already live and operating today. Learn more about TIGA, how the model works, the token utility, and why the existing gambling net

2🔥1

26 Jan 2026, 09:20 UTC394 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

InfoFi is dead. Reward-for-posting is gone. If you’re a Yapper and have got reach, this is the new lane. Starter is collaborating with Gems.vip to support larger private raises, starting with TIGA! 🐯 Earn weekly stablecoin payouts by referring real volume. Build your own network. Get paid on every launch, not just one. TIGA’s private sale is live now. Ambassador? Affiliate? Be a Leader! Apply to become a Leader

🔥41😁1😘1

25 Jan 2026, 10:56 UTC367 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🚨 All about $TIGA Private Sale 🚨 Starter's first private sale with GEMS.vip is now live, starting with TIGA ($TIGA) 🐯 What is TIGA? TIGA blends meme culture with real iGaming/Casino revenue. The casino is already live, generating volume, and profits are redirected into player cashback, staking rewards, and on-chain buybacks. Why people are paying attention: • Live casino with 2,000+ slots, tables, and lottery • Re

🔥31🥰1😘1

21 Jan 2026, 15:16 UTC423 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Back for the first Based Spaces of 2026! 🎙 Based Spaces #56: Where have all the Yappers gone? Market misery... Rounding up our Base friends and fam again. 🗓 Thursday, January 22 ⏰ 3PM UTC 📍 https://x.com/i/spaces/1RDGlAgNyvOJL Pull up, BUIDLers.

🔥3😁21🥰1😍1😘1

1 Jan 2026, 18:04 UTC517 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Happy New Year to the Starter community! 🎉 We’re building toward something bigger in 2026... More to follow 👀

🔥5😁3🤓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @starter_announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Nov 2025, 13:43 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

What are your thoughts on the launchpad/IDO space?

  1. Dead/dying - same old model, zero innovation29%
  2. Stale - needs major innovation to survive31%
  3. Neutral - some good, some bad launchpads20%
  4. Still relevant - evolving slowly but surely7%
  5. Bright future - innovation is coming13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 25 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 146,488 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ICO SPEAKS NEWS
@icospeaksnews · 310,868
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Starter - Official Announcements Channel” (@starter_announcements), 3,263 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starter_announcements.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.