Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 5ireChain Announcements

Channel

5ireChain Announcements

@Fire_Announcements

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,171subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587332580
TypeChannel
Username@Fire_Announcements
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fire_Announcements

Growth

15,17115,25815,214.56 August 2026 — 15,258 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,253 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,245 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,235 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,226 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,212 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,207 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,203 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,190 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,171 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,158–15,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:5515,171-19
14 Aug 2026, 22:1715,190-13
13 Aug 2026, 14:0615,203-4
12 Aug 2026, 17:0315,207-5
11 Aug 2026, 15:5815,212-14
10 Aug 2026, 15:2115,226-9
9 Aug 2026, 16:0815,235-10
8 Aug 2026, 19:0015,245-8
7 Aug 2026, 18:0015,253-5
6 Aug 2026, 22:3315,258first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2025, 03:32 UTC≈5,080 viewsread 15 August 2026
Poll

🗣BTC is moving toward a new ATH, web3’s future looks inevitable. But is the path we’re scaling aligned with long-term responsibility? Sustainability isn’t a footnote, it’s infrastructure. What does Web3 need more of right now?👇

  1. Green consensus50%
  2. ESG based validation23%
  3. Long term incentives43%
  4. Purpose led design16%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2025, 03:16 UTC≈4,610 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🗣We don’t have a scaling problem. We have a design problem. Most L1s scale by splintering rollups, shards, sidechains. But that comes at a cost: fractured liquidity, brittle bridges, inconsistent security. In trying to solve performance, we’re breaking the promise of unified state. 👉5ireChain takes a different path. With Nested Chains, scalability doesn’t come from splitting. It comes from orchestrated concurrenc

24 Jul 2025, 03:47 UTC≈3,800 viewsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Web3 is getting climate smart.♻️ Tokenized credits, carbon-aware infra, and eco-proofs are no longer dreams, they’re shipping. Which shift matters most now? 🗳 Vote below:

  1. Tokenized carbon markets57%
  2. Smart grids meet Web334%
  3. Verifiable green claims23%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Jul 2025, 03:07 UTC≈3,220 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

The Fifth Industrial Revolution is here and Pratik Gauri is laying the foundation. In a deep dive with Dr Michael kloep, he shares🫳 ➛ The mindset behind building 5irechain. ➛ What it takes to scale with purpose and clarity. ➛ Why staying true to vision matters more than the money. This episode of CEO DNA is for the builders who dare to dream bigger.🌐 📣Watch the full episode of CEO DNA https://www.youtube.com/watc

16 Jul 2025, 04:05 UTC≈2,550 viewsread 15 August 2026
Poll

The smart contract future looks modular, fast, and language flexible. Which edge of WASM excites you most?

  1. Near native speed40%
  2. Multi lang support14%
  3. Cross chain deploys34%
  4. Lower gas, more scale35%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Jul 2025, 04:10 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

While others debated Layer 1 vs Layer 2… 🗣Pratik Gauri was scaling an SDG-native blockchain already driving adoption across public systems and academia. where policy meets protocol and vision meets velocity.⚡️ 🔗 UAE STORIES breaks it down https://uaestories.com/pratik-gauri-champion-of-the-5th-industrial/?fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAafiKzj2bv08dSyMGBK5PiI2djpY-S_w4oY-s7hHRJpjMFuUfnB1FOCljnGiJA_aem_PO-p1z6e_dCHWhgpN

14 Jul 2025, 04:31 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin’s back and it’s on fire. 🔥 All time high. Zero chill. Maximum vibes. 🚀

11 Jul 2025, 05:30 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Bitcoin just smashed its ATH. 🚀 The charts are glowing. The streets are buzzing. ✨ Are we finally entering the mega bull run?

  1. Yes43%
  2. Still early22%
  3. Wake me up at $150k35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jul 2025, 03:45 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Greenwashing is dead. Sustainable infrastructure is the new standard. The most forward-thinking blockchains now assign block rights not just by stake but by sustainability score. Eco aligned, verifiable nodes are rewarded. ✅ 👉Sustainability isn’t a bonus, it’s built into the chain’s DNA. 👉This is how Web3 scales with purpose. 👉This is how decentralization meets real-world impact. 📰 Read more: https://bit.ly/44Qii

27 Jun 2025, 13:23 UTC≈3,200 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

📣We’re proud to share that our founder Pratik Gauri will be a featured global speaker at the Global Entrepreneurship Festival 2025 🌐 As the world moves toward the 5th Industrial Revolution, 5ire continues to lead the way where sustainability meets innovation. ♻️ 📍 Accra, Ghana | 🗓 Nov 21–23 🔗 globalentrepreneurshipfestival.com

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Fire_Announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2025, 03:32 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

🗣BTC is moving toward a new ATH, web3’s future looks inevitable. But is the path we’re scaling aligned with long-term responsibility? Sustainability isn’t a footnote, it’s infrastructure. What does Web3 need more of right now?👇

  1. Green consensus50%
  2. ESG based validation23%
  3. Long term incentives43%
  4. Purpose led design16%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Jul 2025, 03:47 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

Web3 is getting climate smart.♻️ Tokenized credits, carbon-aware infra, and eco-proofs are no longer dreams, they’re shipping. Which shift matters most now? 🗳 Vote below:

  1. Tokenized carbon markets57%
  2. Smart grids meet Web334%
  3. Verifiable green claims23%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Jul 2025, 04:05 UTCAnonymous Poll93 voters

The smart contract future looks modular, fast, and language flexible. Which edge of WASM excites you most?

  1. Near native speed40%
  2. Multi lang support14%
  3. Cross chain deploys34%
  4. Lower gas, more scale35%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Jul 2025, 05:30 UTCAnonymous Poll118 voters

Bitcoin just smashed its ATH. 🚀 The charts are glowing. The streets are buzzing. ✨ Are we finally entering the mega bull run?

  1. Yes43%
  2. Still early22%
  3. Wake me up at $150k35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jun 2025, 08:54 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

Solana just slashed validators abusing MEV. The SEC hit Uniswap with a Wells notice. As centralization creeps in quietly, 5ire flips the script with SPoS, where ethics ≠ optional. In 2025, what should consensus really reward? 🔽 Vote below 👇

  1. ESG alignment27%
  2. Honest uptime15%
  3. Community trust54%
  4. Just the stake24%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Jun 2025, 04:05 UTCAnonymous Poll95 voters

Proof-of-work ➡️ Proof-of-stake ➡️ What’s next? 5ire bets on Sustainable PoS but what do you see as the future of consensus?

  1. Sustainable PoS33%
  2. Zero knowledge proofs33%
  3. AI governed chains40%
  4. Hybrid BFT models16%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 29 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 307,337 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“5ireChain Announcements” (@Fire_Announcements), 15,171 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fire_Announcements.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.