11 measurements spanning 26 days, net +181. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,553–5,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 05:18
5,769
+64
30 Aug 2026, 02:45
5,705
+62
26 Aug 2026, 16:04
5,643
+18
23 Aug 2026, 09:36
5,625
+12
19 Aug 2026, 17:18
5,613
+32
16 Aug 2026, 20:56
5,581
-2
13 Aug 2026, 11:23
5,583
-5
10 Aug 2026, 19:13
5,588
-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:56
5,589
+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:02
5,588
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:55
5,588
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.77%
avg views ÷ 5,769 subscribers
Avg views / post
564
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
9 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
5,075
Reactions total
305
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
54s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
305 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
284
93.1%
👏
10
3.28%
🍓
8
2.62%
💔
2
0.656%
😁
1
0.328%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мартин Иден, Джек Лондон
Так много всего хочется написать, но не знаю как сократить полет своих мыслей. Я под большим впечатлением, но с абсолютно-разбитым сердцем. Вчера пол ночи лежала и анализировала сюжетную линию Мартина, его характер и поступки и почему, в конце-концов (без спойлеров) все случилось так, как случилось 💔
Пожалуй, Мартин Иден – не столько роман о том, как добиться успеха, сколько роман о том, чт…
Я тут недавно присмотрела уход для волос, которым хочется поделиться 🤍
Это серия BEAVER Brazilian Keratin — шампунь и бальзам с бразильским кератином. Шампунь заявлен как подходящий для всех типов волос, в том числе для волнистых и кудрявых. А бальзам — для более гладких, мягких и блестящих волос, с акцентом на уменьшение пушистости.
Эффект очень понравился 💗
Волосы легко расчесываются, рассыпаются, не пушатся и бл…
routine 🧺🧚♂️🫖
последние slow дни из нашей жизни
совсем скоро муж улетает на турниры и мы не увидим его около месяца 😩 а еще последние две недели августа остаюсь без няни поэтому полностью буду погружена в материнство и быт, но зато на сентябрь планы очень большие, коплю силы 🫶🏻
Чувство и чувствительность, Джейн Остин
9/10 💗🌸🥛
мне такое по душе! и я бы сказала больше, это произведение и словом и посылом много сильнее знаменитой книги «гордость и предубеждение», с которой чаще ассоциируется Остин
очень понравилось, как история мягко показывает противоположность двух сестриц Дэшвуд – старшая оказывается прагматичной и сдержанной, младшая же больше подвластна эмоциям, чувствам и краскам
одн…
🤍🕊️🫖
в нашу жизнь снова вернулась няня и это прекрасная возможность иногда уделять время себе, друзьям и социализации 🥛
дочитываю «Чувство и чувствительность» и готовлю для вас отзыв, а тем временем, на походе уже новенькие 📚
обновила запасы уходовой косметики, скоро все расскажу и покажу поближе)
планирую с сентября вернуться в «большой» спорт 😂 Матвей пойдет на свои развивашки + бассейн и рутина окончательно во…
❤37🍓4👏1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @sheisvidaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 524,774 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
YANSIKK @yansikk · 38,013 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Хэлфи Клуб @healthy_clubbyLiza · 37,335 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Tanya talks about... @Tanyatalksabout · 46,645 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
by p.llna @pllnnaa · 35,486 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
бесконечный вишлист Софи @sophiaganzburg · 44,607 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
Блог Нечаевой @NechaevaBlog · 48,337 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Инна Плетнева | Красота моими глазами @innamakeru · 59,197 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
SOFIA 💌 @sofia_molz · 50,877 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SHE | Vika Solovyeva” (@sheisvidaily), 5,769 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheisvidaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.