Channel
@viel_los
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,209subscribers
+126 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001588089901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @viel_los |
| Description | Themen, die um Deutschland und Europa wirbeln |
| Created | 20 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/viel_los |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 8,209 | +37 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 8,172 | +19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 8,153 | +71 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 8,082 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 8,083 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 8,083 | first reading |
144 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 142 of 144 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 144 (5 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 164,968 |
| Reactions total | 4,671 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,671 reactions across 141 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 1,396 | 29.9% | |
| 🤡 | 636 | 13.6% | |
| 😁 | 630 | 13.5% | |
| 👍 | 535 | 11.5% | |
| 💩 | 367 | 7.86% | |
| ❤ | 334 | 7.15% | |
| 👏 | 191 | 4.09% | |
| 🔥 | 165 | 3.53% | |
| 🤬 | 103 | 2.21% | |
| 🎉 | 71 | 1.52% | |
| 😱 | 61 | 1.31% | |
| 🤔 | 57 | 1.22% | |
| 👎 | 45 | 0.963% | |
| 🤯 | 36 | 0.771% | |
| 🥰 | 28 | 0.599% | |
| 🤩 | 10 | 0.214% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.128% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,671reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @viel_los. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 144 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Immer mehr Syrer verlieren Schutzstatus – Abschiebungen bleiben aus Laut einer Antwort der Bundesregierung auf eine Anfrage der Linksfraktion widerrief oder entzog das Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge im ersten Halbjahr bei 23,2% von 8320 überprüften Fällen den Schutzstatus. Meist ging es um die Aberkennung der Flüchtlingseigenschaft oder des subsidiären Schutzes. Zum Vergleich: 2025 waren es 3,7%, 2024 nur 3…
❤1🔥1🤮1
👏 Grosz: CDU und Co. begehen systematischen Betrug am eigenen Volk Laut dem Österreichs Journalisten Gerald Grosz wirft den Politikern in Deutschland und Österreich vor, einen großen Wählerverrat zu begehen und begangen zu haben. „Viele Versprechen vor der Wahl – nichts gehalten nach der Wahl. Keine Verlässlichkeit mehr. Keine Prinzipien mehr, an denen man Politiker festmacht“, so Grosz. Driedrich Merz etwa setzte …
👍18👏1🥰1
❗🤯 Großeinsatz in München – Polizei setzt Schusswaffe ein An diesem Dienstagabend ist es zu einem großen Polizeieinsatz in München (Stadtteil Schwabing) gekommen. Medien zufolge hatten Anwohner im Bereich Clemensstraße Ecke Belgradstraße eine verdächtige Person gemeldet, die mit einem „schusswaffenähnlichen Gegenstand“ auf der Straße unterwegs war. Wie die Polizei weiter meldet, machten sich daraufhin zahlreiche Kr…
😁🕺 Die „Spiegel“-Titelstory scheint in Afrika bereits für Begeisterung zu sorgen. Während in Deutschland noch über die Schlagzeile diskutiert wird, wird andernorts schon fleißig getanzt: „Bitte nicht abschieben“ – die Botschaft ist unmissverständlich. Im Kanal @viel_los findest du mehr!
🤡10🤮3
🤡😂 Klingbeil warnt vor Klimakrise – Grüne kontern Vor der Wahl scheint unseren Politikern jedes Mittel recht zu sein, wenn es sich dabei darum handelt, die Wähler ihrer „Gegner“ umzustimmen. Vor allem den Grünen, die heute als Partei kaum noch ernst genommen werden. Auf das Video von Lars Klingbeil, in dem er vor der aktuellen „Klimakrise“ warnt, folgt nun prompt eine Antwort. „Geniale Erkenntnis! Wann hattest du d…
🤮26💩6🤡2❤1
🤡 SPD in ihrem Element: Klingbeil warnt vor „Klimakrise“ – und verspricht Reformen „Klimakrise ist da. Leute, wir haben 12.000 Hitzetote diesen Sommer. Wir erleben Niedrigwasser und wir erleben Waldbrände im ganzen Land. Das hat nichts mit schlechtem Wetter zu tun. Das ist der Klimawandel und dagegen muss man politisch etwas machen!“, erklärt Lars Klingbeil. Eigentlich könnten diese Worte reichen, um sich des Ausmaß…
🤡23🤮15💩10❤1
🌡🚂 Stuttgart 21 bekommt keine Klimaanlage – User spotten über DB-Erklärvideo In einem Video erklärt die Deutsche Bahn, warum der neue Stuttgarter Tiefbahnhof ohne Klimaanlage auskommen soll. Weil das Bauwerk tief unter der Erde liege, würden die Bauteile die Temperatur des Erdreichs annehmen. Zudem ströme über die ansteigenden Tunnel kühlere Luft in den Bahnhof. Dadurch sollen die Temperaturen im Inneren das ganze J…
😁21🤡8🤩2❤1
❗🆘 Deutsche Autoindustrie verliert massenhaft Arbeitsplätze In der deutschen Automobilindustrie arbeiteten Ende Juni 2026 rund 42.300 Menschen weniger als ein Jahr zuvor. Mit 691.500 Beschäftigten fällt die Branche auf den niedrigsten Stand seit 2005. Minus 5,8% binnen zwölf Monaten ist der stärkste Rückgang aller großen Industriezweige mit mehr als 200.000 Beschäftigten. Besonders hart trifft es das Rückgrat der B…
🤮18
⛴🪖Serbien: Sinkende Pegelstände legen Nazi-Schiffswracks in der Donau frei Der extrem niedrige Wasserstand der Donau hat bei Prahovo in Serbien mehrere Wracks deutscher Kriegsschiffe aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg freigelegt. Schaulustige kletterten auf den verwitterten Relikten herum, berichten serbische Medien. Die Wracks werden in besonders heißen Sommern regelmäßig sichtbar. Die Schiffe waren Ende des Zweiten Weltkr…
❤2
😮🤖 China baut Roboter, der Menschen einfach abhängt Das chinesische Robotik-Unternehmen Unitree hat einen humanoiden Roboter vorgestellt, der bis zu zwei Meter hoch springen kann. Die Entwicklung der neuen Maschine laufe erst seit gut drei Monaten, es gebe in den kommenden Monaten noch erhebliches Verbesserungspotenzial, teilte das Unternehmen mit. Beeindruckend ist bereits jetzt die Geschwindigkeit: Der Roboter er…
🤔7🎉2❤1🤮1
„Gnadenlos enttäuscht“: Merz verliert seine treuesten Unterstützer In der baden-württembergischen CDU wächst laut der FAZ der Frust über die Bundesregierung von Friedrich Merz. Selbst langjährige Unterstützer gingen zunehmend auf Distanz. Der frühere CDU-Landtagsfraktionschef Wolfgang Reinhart sagte der Zeitung, er sei von Merz „gnadenlos enttäuscht“. „Er hat seine Versprechen nicht gehalten, weder bei der Performan…
👍18😁6🎉2❤1
🫨🇺🇸 Trump erklärt Straße von Hormus zum „neuen US-Gebiet“ US-Präsident Donald Trump hat auf Social Media ein Bild der Straße von Hormus veröffentlicht und die strategisch wichtige Meerenge dabei als „neues US-Gebiet“ bezeichnet. Zuvor hatte Trump erklärt, die USA kontrollierten die Straße von Hormus. Dem widersprach ein Vertreter des Korps der Islamischen Revolutionsgarden. Er erklärte, nicht die USA, sondern Iran …
🤡15❤11💩4🤬2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @viel_los. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓Umfrage: Wie würdet ihr mit so einer Flüchtlingsunterkunft in eurer Nähe umgehen?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 16,488 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Viel los” (@viel_los), 8,209 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viel_los.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.