Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

VOLKSEMPFÄNGER

@VE301GWn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

372subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001360697569
TypeChannel
Username@VE301GWn
Created30 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VE301GWn

Growth

372373372.56 August 2026 — 373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 373 subscribers15 August 2026 — 372 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 372–373 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:26372-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:02373no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:48373first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.78%
avg views ÷ 372 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total430
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥323.1%
🤡215.4%
🤬215.4%
🤮215.4%
👍17.69%
👎17.69%
👏17.69%
💯17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC13 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @globalpatriotsPhoto

_ Wegen einer Mini-Drohne, die nicht mal Schaden angerichtet hat, diskutiert man die Vorstufe zum Dritten Weltkrieg, aber als Nord Stream gesprengt wurde, was den größten und folgenschwersten terroristischen Anschlag auf Deutschland nach dem 2.Weltkrieg darstellt, wurde kein einziges Mal ein möglicher Bündnisfall ins Gespräch gebracht. Komisch, oder? ➡️ t.me/GlobalPatriots 🦅 ➡️ t.me/GlobalPatriotMEMES 💣 ➡️ t.me/Gl

🤬2

6 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC17 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @unzensiertPhoto

@unzensiert_infoseite #netzfund Wer kennt es noch? @unzensiert / @unzensiertV2

6 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ignazbearth

https://ungarnheute.hu/news/hitzewelle-fuehrt-zu-einschraenkungen-am-heimischen-e-ladenetz-19376/

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC16 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @unzensiertVideo

@unzensiert_infoseite #netzfund Ach schaut einfach selbst @unzensiert / @unzensiertV2

6 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC16 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @unzensiertPhoto

@unzensiert_infoseite #netzfund 😳😳😳😳 Neue Recherchen decken weitere Millionenverluste bei Krankenkassen und Kassenärztliche Vereinigungen auf. Nach Informationen von NDR, WDR und Süddeutscher Zeitung gaben Wirtschaftskanzleien grünes Licht für die Investitionen. @unzensiert / @unzensiertV2

6 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @HerzensmenschenUnitedPhoto

▫️“Ich bin mit der Massenüberwachung einverstanden, weil ich nichts falsch mache.“ ▪️“…Bis jemand die Definition dessen ändert, was „falsch" ist.“ 💯 Teilt uns doch❣️ ➡️ https://t.me/HerzensmenschenUnited

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Hatte da etwa einer einen Geheimnisverrat begangen oder warum wird sofort alles dementiert?😜😅 https://t.me/VE301GWn

💯1

6 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @viel_losPhoto

🧐Mehr als 1000 Juristen fordern AfD-Verbot in offenem Brief – BSW protestiert 1051 Anwälte, Richter, Staatsanwälte, Juristen aus Verwaltung und Wirtschaft sowie Rechtsreferendare haben einen offenen Brief an die Bundesregierung und die Bundestagsabgeordneten unterzeichnet, in dem sie ein AfD-Verbotsverfahren bei dem Bundesverfassungsgericht forderten. Das teilte der Republikanische Anwältinnen- und Anwälteverein (RA

6 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC23 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @WE_R_FREEVideo

Dein Arzt: «Alles normal.» Dein Körper: «Ich bin erschöpft.» 🆘 Wer lügt? ☝️Niemand. Das Problem ist das System. 🇩🇪 Deutschland checkt: BIST DU KRANK? 🇳🇴 Norwegen checkt: BIST DU OPTIMAL? 10 Blutwerte, wo „normal“ dich täuscht: 1. FERRITIN 🇩🇪 Normal: ab 30 → 🇳🇴 Optimal: 80-100+ Bei 35 = „ok“ | Realität = chronische Müdigkeit 2. VITAMIN B12 🇩🇪 Normal: ab 200 → 🇳🇴 Optimal: 400-600+ Bei 250 = „unauffällig“ | Realit

6 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC21 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @DDR_kinderVideo

Über die Innenministerin Behrens 😊🤔 Kind der DDR 👫

6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @danijelsheranVideo

Die EU wurde soeben als Hauptfinanzier der Migranteninvasion entlarvt. Nachdem Alexandra Lavoie die Migranten in Ceuta, Spanien, gefragt hatte, wer sie finanziere, gaben sie eine kurze Antwort: „Wir werden von der Europäischen Union finanziert.“ https://x.com/i/status/2084304076842389653 https://t.me/danijelsheran

👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VE301GWn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VOLKSEMPFÄNGER” (@VE301GWn), 372 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VE301GWn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.