🌍 VAQT.UZ saytining rasmiy kanali
Online — @vaqt_online
Crypto — @vaqtuz_crypto
Moliya — @vaqtuz_fin
Murojaat — @vaqtuz_robot
Reklama — +998 (99) 995-82-24
Created
14 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +999. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,476–44,994 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:42
44,473
+2,618
16 Sept 2026, 05:37
41,855
+858
14 Sept 2026, 15:19
40,997
-133
13 Sept 2026, 05:01
41,130
-153
11 Sept 2026, 07:58
41,283
-203
8 Sept 2026, 11:59
41,486
-280
5 Sept 2026, 09:57
41,766
-173
3 Sept 2026, 11:55
41,939
-161
2 Sept 2026, 02:54
42,100
-112
1 Sept 2026, 01:35
42,212
-113
30 Aug 2026, 23:25
42,325
-104
30 Aug 2026, 02:47
42,429
-133
28 Aug 2026, 23:49
42,562
-111
28 Aug 2026, 02:34
42,673
-163
26 Aug 2026, 23:44
42,836
-211
25 Aug 2026, 21:24
43,047
+31
24 Aug 2026, 20:46
43,016
+945
23 Aug 2026, 08:56
42,071
-107
21 Aug 2026, 19:57
42,178
-102
20 Aug 2026, 15:34
42,280
first reading
Engagement
1,003 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.95%
avg views ÷ 44,473 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,540
576 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.994%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
576
of 1,003 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 556 of 576 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
1,003 (6 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
2,037,716
Reactions total
19,679
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 02:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈35,400
Videos
≈9,600
Links
≈17,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 56m
Average length
1m 22s
Measured directly from 85 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29,575 reactions across 952 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
14,666
49.6%
🔥
4,141
14.0%
❤
4,059
13.7%
👎
2,942
9.95%
👏
1,769
5.98%
💯
785
2.65%
😱
559
1.89%
👌
301
1.02%
😢
146
0.494%
🙏
119
0.402%
😭
88
0.298%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 969 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,575 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vaqtuz_rasmiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Amazon» O‘zbekistonda internet tarqatish uchun rasmiy distribyutorini tanladi
«Amazon Leo» O‘zbekistonda sun’iy yo‘ldosh internetini tarqatish uchun UZ-SAT’ni mamlakatdagi vakolatli distribyutor sifatida belgiladi.
👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=32626
⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy
Behzod Musayev yangi lavozimga tayinlandi — manba
U sentabr oyi boshida Prezidentning tegishli qarori bilan Migratsiya agentligi direktori lavozimidan ozod etilgandi.
👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=32628
⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy
O‘zbekistonda elektromobillar soni 122 mingdan oshdi: Ularning 72 foizi Toshkentda harakatlanmoqda
O‘zbekistonga olib kirilgan jami yengil avtomobillarning 71 foizini elektromobillar tashkil etdi va ushbu importning qariyb 96 foizi yagona davlat — Xitoy tomonidan ta’minlandi.
👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=32624
⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy
“Qoradori–2026” keng qamrovli tezkor-profilaktik tadbirlari davomida Toshkent viloyati hamda Toshkent shahrining Sergeli va Yunusobod tumanlarida qariyb 2 kilogramm giyohvandlik vositalari noqonuniy tarqatilishining oldi olindi
👉 @vaqt_online
«Shartlarsiz»: Ukraina to‘xtashga tayyor
Volodimir Zelenskiy Ukraina hozirgi to‘qnashuv chizig‘ida harbiy harakatlarni to‘xtatib, diplomatik muzokaralar boshlashga tayyorligini e’lon qildi.
👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=32622
⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy
O‘zbekistonda eng ko‘p uy qaysi hududlarda sotilmoqda?
Mamlakatda yil boshidan buyon uy-joy oldi-sotdi bitimlari soni 18 foizdan ko‘proqqa oshgan.
👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=32616
⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy
«Asia Alliance Bank» ATB xalqaro hamkorlikni kengaytirmoqda: BAAning eng yirik banki - First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) bilan kelishuv imzolandi
Birlashgan Arab Amirliklariga amalga oshirilgan biznes tashrifi doirasida «Asia Alliance Bank» ATB vakillari mintaqaning yetakchi moliyaviy institutlaridan biri va Birlashgan Arab Amirliklarining eng yirik banki — First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) rahbariyati bilan muvaffaqiyatli uchras…
Fuqarolarga hokim qarorlari ustidan bevosita sudga shikoyat qilish huquqi berilishi mumkin
Prezidentga qilingan taqdimotga ko‘ra, sudga murojaat qilish uchun belgilangan 6 oylik muddat qayta ko‘rib chiqilib, 4 xil da’vo shakli joriy etiladi.
👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=32614
⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy
Reyting: Toshkent iqtisodiy faollikdagi o‘zgarishlar tezligi bo‘yicha birinchi o‘rinni egalladi
Xalqaro tahlilchilar Toshkentni rivojlanishini kuzatib borish lozim bo‘lgan shaharlar ro‘yxatiga kiritgan.
👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=32612
⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy
«Muammoni sotib olamiz» — Strategik islohotlar agentligi byurokratiyani kamaytirish borasidagi takliflarga pul to‘laydi
Kecha, 21-sentabr kuni Milliy kontent markazi binosida Strategik islohotlar agentligi va Adliya vazirligi mas’ullari ishtirokida matbuot anjumani o‘tkazildi. Tadbirda «Byurokratiyasiz O‘zbekiston» jamoatchilik tashabbusi loyihasi e’lon qilinib, uning doirasida amalga oshiriladigan ishlar haqida OAV…
👍8❤4👏2💯2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,003 posts we hold for @vaqtuz_rasmiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vaqtuz_rasmiy edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Геосиёсат | Politics @GeoPolitico · 26,735 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 September 2026
Kislorod @kislorod_H2O · 26,885 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 September 2026
23.5° бурчак остида @burchakostida · 31,917 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Qalampir LIVE @qalampirlive · 58,969 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 August 2026
XABARLAR @Tezkor24_Daryo24_Xabar24 · 114,527 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 24 August 2026
platforma.uz @platformauzb · 47,361 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026
FARG'ONA24 | TEZKOR XABARLAR @farg_ona1 · 33,171 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 September 2026
Uzdiplomat | Расмий канал @uzdiplomat · 35,180 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
UzA | Rasmiy kanal @uzauzlot · 130,583 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 25 August 2026
bakiroo @the_bakiroo · 60,383 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
Kun.uz | Online @kunonline · 45,620 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Аброр Мухтор Алий @AbrorMuxtorAliy · 84,341 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
ТУРКИЯДАГИ ЎЗБЕКЛАР @turkiyadagi_uzbeklar · 30,940 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
Abror Muxtor Aliy @abrormuxtoraliyrasmiy · 23,895 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
🎥 Drakauz 🌀 | Расмий канал 🔥 @drakauz · 24,547 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 September 2026
Rossiyadagi vatandoşlar @vatandosh_rossiya · 2,831 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 September 2026
GENERALISSIMUS @u_generalissimus · 140,577 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
Qalampir.uz I расмий канал @qalampir · 247,059 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
UZ24 uz @uz24newsuz · 27,442 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 September 2026
Foydali Moliya @foydali_moliya · 53,015 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
Тезкор хабарлар | Tun-u Kun @TezkorxabarUz_official · 211,660 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
VODIYLIKLAR @Vodiyliklar_Elonlar_Bozori_Qoqon · 27,091 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
Pulli Gap @pulli_gap · 30,878 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
Iqtisodchi Kundaligi @iqtisodchi_kundaligi · 33,007 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vaqt.uz | Rasmiy” (@vaqtuz_rasmiy), 44,473 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaqtuz_rasmiy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.