Channel
@economist_Martin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,271subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001682596439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @economist_Martin |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/economist_Martin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 1,271 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 1,280 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 1,287 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 1,295 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 1,296 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
211 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 72 | 34.1% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 20.9% | |
| 💔 | 41 | 19.4% | |
| 💯 | 37 | 17.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 3.79% | |
| 🆒 | 8 | 3.79% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.474% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @economist_Martin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 14 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Doʻstim Muhammadyusuf iymonli insofli, oʻziga ishonchi baland yigit edi. Anchadan buyon oʻz startapini qurish haqida oʻylab, ustida ishlab kelayotgandi. Sogʻligi, ruhiy holati bilan ham, hammasi yaxshi edi. Vafoti haqidagi xabar kutilmagan va ogʻriqli boʻldi. Oilasiga, yaqin insonlariga sabr bersin. Doʻstimning joyi jannatda boʻlsin! https://t.me/vaqtuz_rasmiy/46121
💔37❤2
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
🎞🎞🎞🎞 «Daydi» voqeasi: individual xatomi yoki noto‘g‘ri rag‘batlar asosida ishlayotgan institutsional tizim? Olmazorda yuz bergan shov-shuvli voqea tizimdagi noto‘g‘ri rag‘batlar inson taqdiri bilan o‘ynashayotganini ko‘rsatdi. Nega ichki ishlar xodimlari real xavfsizlik emas, balki «raqamlar» ketidan quvmoqda? 👉 https://vaqt.uz/uz?n=24139 ⌛️ Vaqt.uz rasmiy kanali
👍11
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
Iqtisodchi olim D.Achemoglu va Siyosiy faylasuf M. Sendel o'zaro qiziq mavzularda suhbat qurishibdi. Shulardan biri meritokratiyaning ojiz va salbiy jihatlari haqida. Unga ko'ra muvaffaqiyat faqat insonning o'ziga bog'liq bo'lmagan omillar tufayli ham keladi, ammo meritokratik jamiyatda g'oliblar o'z natijasini faqat o'ziniki deb ko'ra boshlaydi, bunday qarash mag'lublarda ham bo'ladi, ya'ni barchasiga faqat o'zini a…
❤10👍7
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
Bugun Yevropada uy-joy yetishmayapti, Xitoyda esa minglab uylar egasiz turibdi. Bir qarashda bu mutlaqo qarama-qarshi manzara. Ammo diqqat bilan qaralsa, ikkala holatning ildizi bir – davlatning bozor mexanizmlariga haddan tashqari aralashuvi narx signallarini buzib, resurslarni noto‘g‘ri yo‘naltirgan.
👍8❤4
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
Iqtisodchi Shahzod Yoʻldoshboyev aytyapti: Biz tashqi agressorlar uchun Oʻzbekistonga qarshi harakatning narxini oshirishimiz kerak. Buning eng oson yoʻli iqtisodiy rivojlanish. Agar biz qanchalik koʻp davlat bilan savdo hajmini oshiradigan boʻlsak, bizga qarshi xarakatning xarajatini ham shunchalik oshirgan boʻlamiz Muhim mavzuda kerakli gaplar aytilibdi. https://youtu.be/PWIIsnEFWvg?si=8uhDEo6vdffeKnmE
👍9
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
Zafar aka yaxshi yozibdilar erkin savdo haqida. Bizda ko'plab amaldorlar Zafar aka bahslashgan amaldor kabi fikrlaydi. Bu haqida qancha gapirilsa ham, yozilsa ham, baribir tushunishmayapti, negadir...
❤3
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
https://youtu.be/JFB-LfJzLcQ?si=LcFJ-ErPchpeRxWW
❤2❤🔥1👍1
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
Ushbu binoning birinchi qavatida shunday san’at asari bor. U sizni chuqur o‘ylashga undamaydi, biroq istagancha talqin qilish imkonini beradi. Xohlasangiz uylarni turli davlatlar deb tasavvur qiling, xohlasangiz ba’zi mamlakatlar ichidagi vaziyat sifatida qabul qiling. Quvurlardan chiqindi sachramayotgan paytda ayrimlar o‘zini xavfsiz his qilishi mumkin. Ammo chiqindini oqibatlari tepaga ham yetib kelishi aniq. @mus…
👍4❤2😐1
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
«Жиноий жавобгарликка тортиш таҳдиди Федерал захира тизимининг фоиз ставкаларини президентнинг хоҳиш-истакларига қараб эмас, балки халқ манфаатларига нима хизмат қилиши ҳақидаги энг яхши баҳоларимиз асосида белгилаётганининг оқибатидир». «Давлат хизмати баъзан таҳдидлар қаршисида мустаҳкам туришни талаб қилади». https://www.gazeta.uz/uz/2026/01/12/federal-reserve-chair/
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
Rossiyada antimigrant siyosat olib borilishining asl maqsadi dollarning qadrsizlanishiga erishish, degan fikrni eshitdim. Bu qarashga ko‘ra, migrantlar o‘z yurtlariga pul jo‘natish jarayonida dollarga talab yaratmoqda va shu orqali Rossiyaning de-dollarizatsiya siyosatiga xalal berayapti. Shu sababli, go‘yoki hukumat vakillari turli yo‘llar bilan migrantlarni mamlakatdan siqib chiqarayapti. Bu fikrning asossizligi um…
👍7❤2
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
The Economistda “Shimoliy Koreyani boshqarishi mumkin boʻlgan oʻspirin qiz”(The teenage girl who may rule North Korea) nomli maqola chiqibdi. Unga ko‘ra Kim Chen In o‘zidan oldingi hukmdorlarni, ya’ni otasi va bobosini ziyorat qilish marosimida oʻzining qizi bilan ko‘rinish beribdi. Qizaloq hali yosh bo‘lishiga qaramay 2022-yildan beri otasining oldida televediniyada chiqar ekan, xalqaro diplomatik yig‘inlarda ko‘rin…
❤3🆒2💔1
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
https://youtu.be/uamSqFFtjFY?si=C0TkjX53RAkjlASh
❤🔥4
Signed Muhammad Yusupovich
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @economist_Martin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 396,018 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Martin Eden” (@economist_Martin), 1,271 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/economist_Martin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.