@GeoPolitico - Жаҳонда ва минтақамизда юз бераётган сиёсий воқеаларни аниқ ва тезкор ёритадиган канал!
Сиёсий мақолалар, янгиликлар, статистикалар, тарих - ҳаммаси бизда!
Реклама: @manager2_robot
Created
1 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 798 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,033. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,193–27,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 04:09
26,348
-5
9 Nov 2026, 10:34
26,353
-20
8 Nov 2026, 02:59
26,373
-6
6 Nov 2026, 22:11
26,379
-7
5 Nov 2026, 19:59
26,386
-6
4 Nov 2026, 20:37
26,392
-11
3 Nov 2026, 18:01
26,403
-9
2 Nov 2026, 16:08
26,412
-18
1 Nov 2026, 14:17
26,430
-13
31 Oct 2026, 12:17
26,443
-19
30 Oct 2026, 10:06
26,462
-8
29 Oct 2026, 13:38
26,470
-14
28 Oct 2026, 13:16
26,484
+4
27 Oct 2026, 14:49
26,480
-5
26 Oct 2026, 14:51
26,485
-3
25 Oct 2026, 16:38
26,488
-12
24 Oct 2026, 19:47
26,500
-12
23 Oct 2026, 19:45
26,512
-11
22 Oct 2026, 17:38
26,523
-8
21 Oct 2026, 13:01
26,531
first reading
Engagement
895 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 149 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 26,348 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,330
328 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
328
of 895 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
895 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
2,074,970
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 18:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,490
Videos
≈1,720
Links
≈1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 42m
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 122 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 328 posts held from the last 30 days (1.22%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇦🇪🇺 Reuters: Украина яқин 10 йил ичида ҳам Европа Иттифоқига аъзо бўлиши даргумон.
Қайд этилишича, ҳатто оддий ҳолатларда ҳам номзод давлатнинг Европа Иттифоқи сиёсий, демократик ва иқтисодий стандартларига мос келишини таъминлаш учун йиллаб музокаралар олиб бориш ва ҳуқуқий ислоҳотларни амалга ошириш талаб этилади.
Украина эса, урушнинг қандай якунланиши борасидаги ноаниқлик, илдиз отган коррупция ва мамлакат ҳуд…
🇮🇷 Эрон Олий миллий хавфсизлик кенгаши котиби Муҳсин Ризоий:
«Эрон ҳудудида бўлган бойитилган ядровий материалнинг бир заррасидан ҳам воз кечмаймиз.
Биз россиялик дўстларимизга бойитилган материаллар Эронда қолишини ва улардан ўзимиз фойдаланишимизни маълум қилдик. Бизга атом кемалари ва сувости кемаларини лойиҳалаш учун бойитилган ядровий материал зарур», — деди у.
👉 @GeoPolitico
🇪🇸 Испания Бош вазири Педро Санчес:
"АҚШда жаҳон чемпионатида ғалаба қозониш ва Испания миллий терма жамоаси номидан кубокни Трампнинг қўлидан қабул қилиб олиш — муболаға бўлмаса, мен учун ҳақиқий сиёсий оргазм бўлди".
👉 @GeoPolitico
🇮🇷 Bloomberg: Ғарб разведкаси баҳолашича, Эрон ойига тахминан 50 та баллистик ракета ишлаб чиқариш имкониятига эга. Бу уруш бошланишидан олдинги ишлаб чиқариш ҳажмининг қарийб ярмини ташкил этади.
Бу баҳолаш АҚШ ва Исроилнинг бир неча ой давом этган ҳаво зарбаларига қарамай, Теҳрон ракета захираларини тўлдириш ва жавоб зарбалари бериш учун ҳали ҳам сезиларли имкониятларга эга эканини кўрсатади.
👉 @GeoPolitico
🇺🇸 Оқ уй АҚШ мудофаа вазири Пит Хегсетга нисбатан импичмент эълон қилинишига расман қарши чиқди.
Президент маъмурияти мазкур резолюцияни ҳарбийларнинг мавқеини заифлаштириш, Конституцияни бузиш ва миллий хавфсизликка путур етказишга қаратилган сиёсий мақсаддаги уриниш деб баҳолади.
Баёнотда айтилишича, Хегсет фақат берилган буйруқларни бажарган ва ҳарбий операцияларни амалга оширган. Бунинг ўзи эса уни жавобгарликк…
🇺🇸 Урушни қайта бошлаш борасидаги келишмовчиликлар фонида Нетаньяху ва Трамп Эрон масаласини муҳокама қилди.
Манбаларнинг таъкидлашича, суҳбат кескин ва таранг руҳда ўтган. Бироқ Исроил бош вазири идораси бу баҳони рад этиб, уни «ёлғон хабар» деб атади ва суҳбат қийин кечмаганини билдирди.
👉 @GeoPolitico
🇺🇸 Давлат котиби Марко Рубио: «Бизнинг вазифамиз — президентнинг топшириқларини бажариш».
Айни пайтда, АҚШ уруш вазири Пит Хегсет ҳарбий операциялар «олий бош қўмондоннинг буйруғи билан амалга оширилгани»ни таъкидлади. Бу эса якуний масъулият президент Дональд Трамп зиммасида эканини англатади.
👉 @GeoPolitico
🇺🇸⚡️ Трамп: «Қатар, Саудия Арабистони, Бирлашган Араб Амирликлари, Баҳрайн, Қувайт ва бошқа давлатлар мавжуд вазиятни сақлаб қолишни афзал кўради».
👉 @GeoPolitico
Showing the 12 most recent of 895 posts we hold for @GeoPolitico. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@GeoPolitico named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@geopolitici named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
@geopoliico named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Kislorod @kislorod_H2O · 25,005 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 September 2026
Vaqt.uz | Rasmiy @vaqtuz_rasmiy · 39,556 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
23.5° бурчак остида @burchakostida · 31,718 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Qalampir LIVE @qalampirlive · 57,660 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 August 2026
Xayrulla HAMIDOV ijodi /official @Xayrulla_Hamidov_adabiyot · 28,760 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
platforma.uz @platformauzb · 41,603 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026
Turkistannews @turkistonxabar · 18,837 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 1 October 2026
ТУРКИЯДАГИ ЎЗБЕКЛАР @turkiyadagi_uzbeklar · 31,263 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
. @MubashshirAhmad · 30,762 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Uzdiplomat | Расмий канал @uzdiplomat · 34,896 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 September 2026
Vatandoş ROSSIYA (Migrant.uz) @vatandosh_rossiya · 25,925 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 September 2026
bakiroo @the_bakiroo · 60,627 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
Global Tahlil l Rasmiy sahifa @globaltahliluz · 21,973 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 September 2026
Қорахабар | Тезкор Хабарлар @koraxabar · 246,362 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
Kun.uz | Rasmiy kanal @kunuz · 71,289 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
Abror Muxtor Aliy @abrormuxtoraliyrasmiy · 23,386 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
BoburAkmalov @boburakmalov · 68,219 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
Rost24 | Расмий канал @rost_24uz · 39,175 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
Kun.uz | Online @kunonline · 44,336 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Qalampir.uz I расмий канал @qalampir · 242,659 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
Жайдари ҳазиллар @jaydari_hazillar · 27,665 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
davletovuz @davletovuz · 78,699 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
KINO OVOZ PARÇALARI @kinoovozparchalari · 20,464 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 4 October 2026
GENERALISSIMUS @u_generalissimus · 148,648 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Геосиёсат | Politics” (@GeoPolitico), 26,348 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeoPolitico.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.