National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -26,612. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 513,244–547,840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:42
517,236
-3,019
14 Aug 2026, 05:27
520,255
-1,918
12 Aug 2026, 21:57
522,173
-11,620
11 Aug 2026, 20:13
533,793
-6,325
10 Aug 2026, 21:25
540,118
-570
10 Aug 2026, 00:30
540,688
-990
8 Aug 2026, 23:01
541,678
-924
7 Aug 2026, 23:31
542,602
-884
7 Aug 2026, 02:28
543,486
-362
6 Aug 2026, 04:15
543,848
first reading
Engagement
320 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.64%
avg views ÷ 517,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
34,400
320 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.376%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
320
of 320 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
320 (5 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
10,997,690
Reactions total
41,354
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈65,700
Videos
≈77,200
Links
≈10,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 00m
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 180 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,825 reactions across 301 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9,198
23.7%
❤
7,872
20.3%
🤣
6,263
16.1%
🤬
4,261
11.0%
👎
3,903
10.1%
😁
2,204
5.68%
😢
1,773
4.57%
😱
658
1.69%
😭
446
1.15%
🔥
380
0.979%
👏
268
0.69%
🙏
235
0.605%
💯
229
0.59%
🤔
179
0.461%
🤯
162
0.417%
🫡
133
0.343%
❤🔥
122
0.314%
👌
93
0.24%
🥱
71
0.183%
🤩
61
0.157%
19 further kinds
314
0.809%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 320 of the 320 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41,354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 320 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
120
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 320 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MILITSIYA_UZB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 320 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️❗️iPhone ишлатадиганлар диққатига: янги IOS янгиланиши смартфонингизни бузиши мумкин — фойдаланувчилар паролларни қабул қилинмаётганидан шикоят қилишмоқда!
Хизмат кўрсатиш марказлари муаммо кенг тарқалганлигини тасдиқлади: ягона ечим аввалги завод созламаларига қайтаришдир
Бу муаммо барча шахсий маълумотлар, фотосуратлар ва ўрнатилган иловаларнинг тўлиқ йўқолишига олиб келади. Агар сиз ҳали янгиламаган бўлсангиз,…
#Ана_ҳолос
🇸🇦 Саудия 11-синф араб тили дарслигидан “Мусулмонлар Қуддусдан ҳеч қачон воз кечмайди” деган жумлани олиб ташлади
Бу “Vision-2030” дастури доирасидаги ўқув дастурларини мўътадиллаштириш йўналишининг бир қисми бўлиб, унда “Сионистик душман” ибораси ҳам “Исроил оккупацияси” сўзи билан алмаштирилган.
@Militsiya_Uzb👈🏽
🇹🇯 🇺🇿 Тожикистонда ўзбек тилида ўқитадиган янги мактаблар қурилади.
Имомали Раҳмон Турсунзода шаҳрида ўзбекзабон аҳоли учун янги мактаблар очиш ва уларни ўзбек тилидаги дарсликлар билан таъминлашни топширди.
@Militsiya_Uzb👈🏽
🚗 BOSVORSHKERE — YouTube’da avto olami!
🎥 Jonli va qiziqarli avto kontent
🚘 Mashina oldi-sotdi
💡 Avtomobillar haqida foydali maslahatlar
⭐ Faqat yaxshilarini ulashamiz
Mashinalarga qiziqsangiz — YouTube kanalimizga obuna bo‘ling! 👇
🟥📲 YouTube: BOSVORSHKERE
Obuna bo‘ling — oldinda hali ko‘p foydali va qiziqarli videolar bor! 🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 320 posts we hold for @MILITSIYA_UZB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@MILITSIYA_UZB edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 19,582 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 90 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Telegram_Yulduzlari| Расмий канал @tyuzbek · 1,063,085#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Samarqandliklar 🇺🇿 @Samarqand_Samarkand · 124,381 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 August 2026
Telegram_Yulduzlari| Расмий канал @tyuzbek · 1,063,085 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 August 2026
Navoiy Kanal @Navoiy_kanalUz · 100,335 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026
SIGNAL 🛜 | Расмий @signalrasmiy · 103,355 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
Telegram yulduzlari @Video92 · 105,309 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
Shou-biznes yangiliklari @shoubizyangiliklari · 122,761 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
JIZZAXLIKLAR🇺🇿 @Jizzax · 230,548 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
Тезкор хабарлар | Tun-u Kun @TezkorxabarUz_official · 219,860 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
Qalampir.uz I расмий канал @qalampir · 251,644 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
Farg'ona 24 | Расмий @Fargona24 · 410,080 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
🌱Uncha-Muncha @UnchaMuncha · 449,626 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
JONLI BOLTA — News @Jonli_Bolta · 403,292 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
BIRINCHI UZ | Расмий канал @BIRINCHI_UZ · 560,221 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 August 2026
Kanallani Dodasi | Расмий канал @kduzb · 828,736 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
PATRUL UZ | РАСМИЙ КАНАЛ @patrul_uz · 966,941 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 August 2026
OPER UZ | Расмий канал @OPER_UZ · 1,008,978 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 August 2026
Surxondaryoliklar.Uz | Расмий @Boysun_shorchi_Termizlik_Denovli · 427,643 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 August 2026
UZBOOM @UZBOOM · 133,490 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
UZBEKONA | Расмий канал @Uzbekona · 146,232 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
TIBBIYOT TV @TIBBIYOT_TV · 200,010 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
UZBEK VIDEO CHANNEL @uzbekvideo · 199,999 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 August 2026
Andijonliklar TV | Расмий @Andijonliklar_TV · 201,186 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
Тезкор хабарлар | Расмий канал @tezkor24official · 245,012 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 August 2026
Тошкент Бугун | Toshkent Bugun @toshkent_bugun · 601,626 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 128 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
my.uzbmb.uzregistrable domain: uzbmb.uz1 post · 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MILITSIYA UZB | Расмий канал” (@MILITSIYA_UZB), 517,236 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MILITSIYA_UZB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.