Channel
@ulama_ramadan
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,538subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001849593035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ulama_ramadan |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ulama_ramadan |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @adab_salaf/245928 May 2026, 05:12 UTC | @ulama_ramadan/920 · this entry28 May 2026, 05:25 UTC | 1.00 | 14 minutes |
| @ulama_ramadan/927 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC | @adab_salaf/246316 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @adab_salaf/246422 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC | @ulama_ramadan/930 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ulama_ramadan/934 · this entry23 Jun 2026, 14:31 UTC | @adab_salaf/247225 Jun 2026, 07:32 UTC | 1.00 | 41 hours |
| @adab_salaf/246623 Jun 2026, 05:35 UTC | @ulama_ramadan/936 · this entry24 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC | 1.00 | 28 hours |
| @imaams/143615 Jun 2026, 20:28 UTC | @ulama_ramadan/926 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC | 1.00 | 20 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @adab_salaf | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 14 minutes | @adab_salaf (5–2) |
| @imaams | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @imaams (4–1) |
| @ulama | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @ulama (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 May 2026 to 25 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @adab_salaf. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 2,538 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 2,541 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 2,541 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
• Ибн Таймийя (728 г.х.) сказал: «Пост в день ‘Ашура является искуплением грехов в течении года, и не порицается поститься только в этот день». ابن تيمية: صِيَامُ يَوْمِ عَاشُورَاءَ كَفَّارَةُ سَنَةٍ وَلا يُكْرَهُ إفْرَادُهُ بِالصَّوْمِ 📚 См. «аль-Фатауа аль-кубра» 4/461 © t.me/bin_taymiyyah © t.me/imaams 🌙 t.me/ulama_ramadan
✅ Искупление грехов постом ‘Ашура • Посланник Аллаха (ﷺ) сказал: «Я надеюсь, что за пост дня ‘Ашура Аллах простит грехи прошлого года». وَصِيَامُ يَوْمِ عَاشُورَاءَ أَحْتَسِبُ عَلَى اللَّهِ أَنْ يُكَفِّرَ السَّنَةَ الَّتِي قَبْلَهُ Примечание: имеются в виду грехи, помимо больших (для их искупления необходимо покаяние) 📚 Муслим 1162 © t.me/adab_salaf 🌙 t.me/ulama_ramadan
✅ Пост только в день ‘Ашура (10 Мухаррам) • Вопрос: «Допускается ли соблюдение поста только в один день ‘Ашура?» • Ответ: «Допускается соблюдение поста только в один день ‘Ашура, однако лучше поститься в день до него или после него. Это и есть сунна, достоверно установленная со слов пророка (ﷺ): “Если я доживу до следующего [года], то буду поститься [также] в девятый день” (Муслим 1134). Ибн ‘Аббас (да будет доволе…
✅ Стремление пророка (ﷺ) для дня ‘Ашура • Ибн ‘Аббас (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: «Не видел я, чтобы посланник Аллаха (ﷺ) желал поста в какой-нибудь день и отдавал ему предпочтение перед другими днями, как пост в день ‘Ашура, как и не было такого месяца для него, кроме месяца Рамадан». مَا رَأَيْتُ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَتَحَرَّى صِيَامَ يَوْمٍ فَضَّلَهُ عَلَى غَيْرِهِ، إِلَّا هَذَا ا…
🔴 ‘АШУРА — четверг 25 июня Как известно — желательно поститься в этот день с днем до (среда) и/или после (пятница). • Ибн ‘Аббас (да будет доволен им Аллах) рассказывал: «Когда посланник Аллаха (ﷺ) постился в день ‘Ашура (десятого числа) и приказал своим сподвижникам делать то же самое, они сказали: “О посланник Аллаха, это – день, который чтят иудеи и христиане”. Тогда посланник Аллаха (ﷺ) сказал: “Следующий год, …
✅ Сподвижники пророка и пост в день ‘Ашура [1] Са’ид ибн аль-Мусайиб говорил: «Пророк (ﷺ), Абу Бакр и ‘Умар (да будет доволен ими Аллах) повелевали (побуждали) поститься в день ‘Ашура». عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيِّبِ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ وَأَبَا بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ أَمَرُوا بِصَوْمِ عَاشُورَاءَ 📚 ат-Табари в «Тахзибуль-асар» (муснад ‘Умар) 667 [2] Абу Бакр ибн ‘Абдур-Рахман ибн аль-Харис сказал: «В ночь перед днём ‘Ашу…
✅ Пост ‘Ашура даже в пути • Абу Джабаля рассказывал: «Я был в пути вместе с Ибн Шихабом [аз-Зухри] (табиин) и он соблюдал пост дня ‘Ашура. Когда ему сказали: “Ты соблюдаешь пост ‘Ашура в пути, а пост месяца Рамадан в пути не соблюдаешь?” Он ответил: “Поистине, Рамадан можно восполнить «в другое время» (Коран 2:185), а день ‘Ашура восполнить нельзя”». كُنْتُ مَعَ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ فِي سَفَرٍ فَصَامَ يَوْمَ عَاشُورَاءَ،…
✅ Достоинство поста в день ‘Ашура 📖 В день ‘Ашура Всевышний Аллах даровал спасение пророку Мусе (мир ему) и его народу. В благодарность за эту милость пророк Муса постился в этот день, а Пророк Мухаммад ﷺ побуждал свою общину следовать этому примеру. Издательство «аль-Мидад» t.me/al_midad 📝 Уважаемый ученый: шейх Са’ад аль-Хаслян (да сохранит его Аллах), известный специалист по фикху С. Аравии (г. Эр-Рияд), препода…
✅ Три вида поста ‘Ашура • Ибн аль-Къаййим (751 г.х.) сказал: «Пост в этот день имеет три вида: (1) наилучший из них — это пост с днем до и днем после него. (2) Затем следующий вид — это соблюдение поста в девятый (9-й) и десятый (т.е. ‘Ашура) день, и на это указывают большинство хадисов. (3) И после этого идет соблюдение поста только в день ‘Ашура, десятого числа». ابن القيم: فَمَرَاتِبُ صَوْمِهِ ثَلَاثَةٌ أَكْمَلُ…
✅ Всевышний спас Мусу в день ‘Ашура • Ибн ‘Аббас (да будет доволен им Аллах) рассказывал: “Когда Пророк (ﷺ) прибывший в Медину увидел, что иудеи постятся в день ‘Ашура, он спросил их: “Что это?” Они ответили: “Это – великий день, тот день, когда Аллах спас сынов Исраиля от их врага, и поэтому Муса стал соблюдать пост в этот день”. На это Пророк (ﷺ) сказал: “Мы имеем больше прав на Мусу, чем вы и ближе к нему, чем вы…
🔊 Достоинства месяца Мухаррам | шейх Салих аль-Фаузан Читать текст: https://telegra.ph/Dostoinstvo-Muharrama-09-02 © t.me/fawzan_ru © t.me/ulama
• Шейх аль-Баррак (حَفِظَهُ الله) сказал: «Мусульмане должны возвеличивать этот месяц (Мухаррам) соблюдая пост в течении всего месяца, или же [в некоторые дни] как можно больше, или же [хотя бы] в девятый и десятый день (т.е. ‘Ашура)». البراك: ينبغي للمسلمين أن يُظهِروا تعظيم هذا الشهر بصيامه كلِّه، أو ما تيسر منه، أو صيام التاسع والعاشر 📚 См. «Шахру-ллах аль-мухаррам» © t.me/barrak_ru © t.me/ulama 🌙 t.me/ulama_ram…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ulama_ramadan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 17,157 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рамадан и остальное ©” (@ulama_ramadan), 2,538 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulama_ramadan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.