Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Акъида Саляфов ©

@aqida_salaf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,855subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001740111
TypeChannel
Username@aqida_salaf
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aqida_salaf

Growth

2,8512,8552,8536 August 2026 — 2,853 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,853 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,851 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,852 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,855 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,850–2,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:572,855+3
9 Aug 2026, 15:122,852+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:092,851-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:052,853no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:482,853first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 2,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
532
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 June 202521 July 2026)
Views total532
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC532 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @najdiyunPhoto

✅ Пренебрежение книгами саляфов ведет к заблуждению • Шейх Исхакъ ибн ‘Абдур-Рахман ибн Хасан (1276 г.х.) сказал: «Кто питается трудами поздних авторов, не обращаясь при этом к книгам известных приверженцев Сунны, таким как “ас-Сунна” ‘Абдуллаха сына имама Ахмада, “ас-Сунна” аль-Халляля, “ас-Сунна” аль-Лялякаи, а также ад-Дарими и других, — тот останется в растерянности и заблуждении».‏ ‏ إسحاق آل الشيخ: ومن تغذى بك

7 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC752 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @adab_salaf

✅ Опасность разговора о религии без знания • Абу Бакр ас-Сыддикъ (да будет доволен им Аллах) говорил: «Какое небо укроет меня и какая земля понесёт меня если я скажу о Книге Аллаха то, чего не знаю?!» كَانَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ يَقُولُ: أَيُّ سَمَاءٍ تُظِلُّنِي وَأَيُّ أَرْضٍ تُقِلُّنِي إِذَا قُلْتُ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ مَا لَا أَعْلَمُ 📚 Малик (2079), Ибн Аби Шейба (32100), «Тафсир ат-Табари» (1/72) © t.me/tafsir_salaf ©

28 Jun 2026, 13:04 UTC≈6,510 viewsread 7 August 2026

• ‘Умар ибн ‘Абдуль-‘Азиз (табиин) сказал: «Кто сделал свою религию предметом споров, тот станет часто переходить (из одного убеждения в другое)». عُمَرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ: مَنْ جَعَلَ دِينَهُ غَرَضًا لِلْخُصُومَاتِ أَكْثَرَ التَّنَقُّلَ 📚 ад-Дарими (312) © t.me/aqida_salaf

7 Jun 2026, 17:23 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 7 August 2026

✅ Курси (Престол) и ‘Арш (Трон) • Ибн ‘Аббас (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: «Престол (аль-Курси) – это место для Двух Стоп [Аллаха], а величину Трона (аль-‘Арш) никто не в силах постичь». عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ: الْكُرْسِيُّ مَوْضِعُ الْقَدَمَيْنِ، وَالْعَرْشُ لَا يُقَدِّرُ أَحَدٌ قَدْرَهُ 📚 ад-Дарими в «ан-Накъд» (84), ‘Абдуллах ибн Ахмад в «ас-Сунна» (586), Ибн Хузайма в «ат-Таухид» (154), Ибн Аби Хати

10 May 2026, 15:38 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 7 August 2026

✅ Приверженность Сунне — спасение • Ибн Шихаб аз-Зухри (табиин) сказал: «Те из наших ученых, кто был до нас, говорили: “Приверженность Сунне — это спасение, а знание же будет забираться быстро. Сохранение знания — это устойчивость религии и мирской жизни, а в исчезновении знания уход всего этого”». عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ قَالَ: كَانَ مَنْ مَضَى مِنْ عُلَمَائِنَا يَقُولُونَ: الِاعْتِصَامُ بِالسُّنَّةِ نَجَاةٌ، وَالْعِلْ

10 May 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 7 August 2026

📣 Продолжение работы иншаАллах

5 Jan 2026, 14:05 UTC≈4,060 viewsread 7 August 2026

• Абуль-Джауза (табиин) сказал: «Клянусь Тем, в Чьей руке моя душа, если бы мой дом наполнился обезьянами и свиньями, это было бы для меня предпочтительнее, чем чтобы по соседству со мной находился кто-либо из обладателей ересей (нововведений)». عَنْ أَبِي الْجَوْزَاءِ قَالَ: وَالَّذِي نَفْسِي بِيَدِهِ لَئِنْ تَمْتَلِئَ دَارِي قِرَدَةً وَخَنَازِيرَ أَحَبُّ إِلَيَّ مِنْ أَنْ يُجَاوِرَنِي أَحَدٌ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْأَهْوَا

22 Dec 2025, 05:08 UTC≈13,600 viewsread 7 August 2026

✅ Слова сподвижников пророка (ﷺ) о праздниках неверующих [1] ‘Умар ибн аль-Хаттаб (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: «Отдаляйтесь от врагов Аллаха (неверующих) во время их праздников». عمر بن الخطاب: اجْتَنِبُوا أَعْدَاءَ اللَّهِ فِي عِيدِهِمْ 📚 аль-Байхакъи в «ас-Сунан аль-Кубра» 18862 [2] ‘Умар ибн аль-Хаттаб (да будет доволен им Аллах) также сказал: «Не учитесь речи иноземцев (неверующих) и не заходите в храм

28 Nov 2025, 19:04 UTC≈3,520 viewsread 7 August 2026

• Малик ибн Анас (179 г.х.) сказал: «Споры (препирательства) в вопросах знания ожесточают сердце и порождают враждебность». مَالِك بْن أَنَسٍ: الْمِرَاءُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يُقَسِّي الْقَلْبَ وَيُورِثُ الضِّغْنَ 📚 Ибн Батта в «аль-Ибана» 653 © t.me/imams4 © t.me/aqida_salaf

9 Nov 2025, 07:23 UTC≈4,070 viewsread 7 August 2026

• Бишр аль-Хафи (227 г.х.) сказал: «Признак послушания Аллаху — это полное принятие Его велений для повиновения Ему. А признак любви к посланнику Аллаха (ﷺ) — это принятие его преданий и действие в соответствии с его Сунной, не обращая внимания на других». قَالَ بِشْرٌ الْحَافِي: عَلَامَةُ طَاعَةِ اللَّهِ تَسْلِيمُ أَمْرِهِ لِطَاعَتِهِ وَعَلَامَةُ حُبِّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّي اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ تَسْلِيمُ آثَ

6 Nov 2025, 13:24 UTC≈3,590 viewsread 7 August 2026

✅ При появлении новшества изчезает сунна • Хассан ибн ‘Атыйя (табиин) сказал: «Если люди вносят в свою религию какое-либо нововведение (бид’а), то Аллах лишает их равноценной сунны, после чего Он не вернёт её им вплоть до Дня воскрешения». عَنْ حَسَّانَ بْنِ عَطِيَّةَ قَالَ: مَا ابْتَدَعَ قَوْمٌ بِدْعَةً فِي دِينِهِمْ إِلَّا نَزَعَ اللَّهُ مِنْ سُنَّتِهِمْ مِثْلَهَا، ثُمَّ لَا يُعِيدُهَا عَلَيْهِمْ إِلَى يَوْمِ الْ

26 Oct 2025, 13:05 UTC≈9,680 viewsread 7 August 2026

• Мухаммад ибн Сирин (табиин) сказал: «Если бы появился Даджаль, то, думаю, что за ним последуют приверженцы прихоти (нововведений)». عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ سِيرِينَ قَالَ: لَوْ خَرَجَ الدَّجَّالُ لَرَأَيْتُ أَنَّهُ سَيَتَّبِعُهُ أَهْلُ الْأَهْوَاءِ 📚 аль-Лялякаи в «Шарх усуль аль-и’тикъад» 230 © t.me/aqida_salaf

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aqida_salaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 466,765 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Акъида Саляфов ©” (@aqida_salaf), 2,855 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqida_salaf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.