Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал «Учимся учить иначе»

Channel

Канал «Учимся учить иначе»

@uchimsyauchitinache

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

12,786subscribers

-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644714476
TypeChannel
Username@uchimsyauchitinache
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/uchimsyauchitinache

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,78612,92412,8556 August 202615 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 101 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,765–12,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Nov 2026, 10:4912,786-3
10 Nov 2026, 04:2012,789-5
8 Nov 2026, 19:4112,794-9
7 Nov 2026, 10:0012,803-4
6 Nov 2026, 10:5912,807-3
5 Nov 2026, 08:2012,810+1
4 Nov 2026, 04:3712,809+15
3 Nov 2026, 03:2112,794+4
2 Nov 2026, 04:2712,790-5
1 Nov 2026, 02:2912,795-9
30 Oct 2026, 23:5712,804-4
30 Oct 2026, 02:5512,808-2
29 Oct 2026, 03:0912,810-5
28 Oct 2026, 01:0912,815-2
26 Oct 2026, 22:5612,817-1
25 Oct 2026, 22:4412,818-7
24 Oct 2026, 21:2712,825-4
24 Oct 2026, 00:1412,829-2
23 Oct 2026, 02:5112,831-4
22 Oct 2026, 00:5012,835first reading

Engagement

110 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.76%
avg views ÷ 12,786 subscribers
Avg views / post
736
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 110 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held110 (25 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total27,979
Reactions total457
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 54s
Average length
2m 14s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,477 reactions across 86 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤67145.4%
🔥39927.0%
👍885.96%
🎉664.47%
😢432.91%
😁422.84%
🤣291.96%
👎271.83%
😨161.08%
🤔120.812%
🤬110.745%
👏100.677%
🤷‍♂80.542%
💯70.474%
🤡70.474%
🥰70.474%
🆒60.406%
💔50.339%
🥴50.339%
👌30.203%
8 further kinds151.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 30 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (76.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC419 views4 reactionsread 15 November 2026

А что, если дети перестают задавать вопросы не потому, что им всё стало понятно, а потому, что мы отучили их спрашивать? 🤔 Вспомните маленького ребёнка. «Почему небо голубое?», «А куда исчезает солнце?», «А почему люди умирают?», «А что будет, если…?» А теперь представим школьный урок. Исследователи посчитали, что большинство вопросов задаются учителем, при этом большинство этих вопросов на выдачу правильного ответ…

❤4

Signed Svetlana Motorina

13 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC495 views5 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Как работают критериальное оценивание? Друзья, организаторы конференции по критериальному оцениванию выложили запись презентации системы КСО. Этого нет в слайдах, которые я выкладывала несколько дней назад. Если хотите разобраться в том, как работает КСО, обязательно посмотрите ))) https://vkvideo.ru/video-200364711_456239554 Канал также дублируется в MAX

🔥4❤1

Signed Svetlana Motorina

12 Nov 2026, 04:27 UTC558 views17 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Школа для счастья Всем привет 😊 Вышла моя публикация про школу «Мир» и немножко про Доброград. Я влюбилась в концепцию города, в бизнес со смыслом и предпринимателя, который про людей (редкость) https://dzen.ru/a/avNahlALcjWVCu3t Канал также дублируется в MAX

👍10❤5🥰2

Signed Svetlana Motorina

11 Nov 2026, 06:23 UTC650 views7 reactionsread 15 November 2026
File

Памятка по мышлению роста Канал также дублируется в MAX

🔥5👏2

Signed Svetlana Motorina

11 Nov 2026, 06:22 UTC636 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, сегодня в 15:00 на площадке Я-класс продолжим цикл лекций "Что рассказать ребенку о том, как учится мозг?". Это будет уже 3-я лекция. Сегодня о: 🎯важности мышления роста в обучении и 🎯 немножко о том, как работает память и как ей помочь. Регистрация по ссылке https://go.yaklass.ru/events/166063, но вроде бы надо быть зарегистрированным в Я-класс тоже. По этому случаю делюсь в следующем посте полезной пам…

Signed Svetlana Motorina

9 Nov 2026, 04:34 UTC805 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Анонс вебинара перед стартом курса "А что, если?" Друзья, многие ждали старта курса "А что, если?" Я провожу его только раз в год в декабре. Поэтому обычно и весной и летом получаю вопросы - когда? Вот уже наконец сейчас ))) Основные уроки и эфиры стартуют 6 декабря. Традиционно перед курсом провожу открытый вебинар "Дети перестали задаваться вопросами или взрослые не умеют этому научить?" 🕒Ставьте в календаре гал…

❤2

Signed Svetlana Motorina

8 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTC790 views7 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Материалы научно-практической конференции по критериальному оцениванию Друзья, конференция завершилась. И организаторы выложили все презентации в открытый доступ. Это кладезь. Если ваша школа переходит на КСО или не переходит, но вы - учитель, который хочет грамотно разработать критерии к своему предмету по уровням и к конкретным заданиям, то это надо срочно сохранять. Материалы по ссылке https://disk.yandex.ru/d/l…

👍6🤯1

Signed Svetlana Motorina

6 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC851 views14 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Вытащила для мастер-класса кусочек из курса «Волшебные слова». Про то, как вести трехстороннюю встречу в конце четверти учитель - ученик - родитель. Провела небольшой замер. На мастер-класс пришло человек 60 (даже развиртуализировались и пообнимались с читателями и онлайн-учениками). На вопрос, кто из гос школ, кто из частных, почти все отнесли себя к частным. У двух третьих участников Критериальная система оцениван…

❤11🔥3

Signed Svetlana Motorina

6 Nov 2026, 07:38 UTC744 views13 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Какое счастье со сцены от учителей и директоров школ услышать слова Не идем от учебника. Идем от целей и критериев (ожидаемых образовательных результатов). Как часто я слышу учительское отчаяние «учебник дурацкий, а где мне взять задание, чтобы сделать то и то, в наших КИМ этого нет». Учитель - часто заложник учебника. И это печально. Выходим из этих рамок. Учебник, даже рекомендованный и спущенный сверху, это ли…

❤8👍4🥰1

Signed Svetlana Motorina

6 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC716 views7 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Работа 2-дневной научно-практической конференции по критериальному оцениванию началась. На слайде лишь некоторые школы России, живущие по системе критериального оценивания. Здесь не хватает Летово, Skolka, Мир, Олимп-Плюс, Новой и других. Представлены только те, кто сейчас будут выступать на пленарке. Канал также дублируется в MAX

❤5👍2

Signed Svetlana Motorina

6 Nov 2026, 05:53 UTC687 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Сочинение без единой ошибки, аккуратное, строго по плану. Только написано совсем не так, как этот ученик пишет на уроке. С нейросетями в домашних заданиях учителя столкнулись раньше многих. Запрещать бесполезно, а гадать, писал ли ученик сам, долго и почти всегда без уверенного ответа. Поэтому многие учителя начинают продумывать задания, которые сложно отдать нейросети. Мнение о прочитанном нейросеть напишет легко, …

❤6

Signed Svetlana Motorina

6 Nov 2026, 05:53 UTC627 viewsread 15 November 2026

Друзья, редко берусь советовать платные мероприятия. Но вот про онлайн конференцию «Обучение со смыслом» поделюсь анонсом. Сама была спикером там в прошлом году. Тема этого года - нейросети👇 Канал также дублируется в MAX

Signed Svetlana Motorina

Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @uchimsyauchitinache. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@uchimsyauchitinache edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @uchimsyauchitinache as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Школа мышления. Вояж в страну загадок.
@shkolamishleniA · 22,734
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Актион Образование
@action_obrazovanie · 36,535
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Диссертация | Наталья Киреева | О научных статьях и диссертациях
@kireeva_science · 21,262
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 September 2026
Банда умников. Занятия с детьми
@banda_u · 24,426
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Теории и Практики
@tandp_ru · 21,981
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
#ЧёртовыПодростки
@FreakingTeens · 39,409
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Егошин | Кеды профессора
@egoshin_kedprof · 19,486
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 October 2026
Живое обучение
@prolearning · 20,603
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 September 2026
Средняя школа
@c_5_po_11_klass · 32,278
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Травля: со взрослыми согласовано (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…ru/molodegnie-granty-v-tatarstane/ |url-status=live }}{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/uchimsyauchitinache |title=Telegram: Contact @uchimsyauchitinache<!-- Заголовок…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал «Учимся учить иначе»” (@uchimsyauchitinache), 12,786 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uchimsyauchitinache.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.