Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Way of the Samurai

@wayofthesamura

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,452subscribers

-85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001764028776
TypeChannel
Username@wayofthesamura
DescriptionHi guys 🕺🏽♥️ ✍️📩 [email protected] https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/679b4d5cb34cfc6080d6fdbe
Created21 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wayofthesamura

Growth

16,45216,53716,494.56 August 2026 — 16,537 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,537 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,534 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,511 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,507 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,505 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,489 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,485 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,466 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,452 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,439–16,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:0816,452-14
13 Aug 2026, 00:3316,466-19
12 Aug 2026, 03:3516,485-4
11 Aug 2026, 01:1316,489-16
10 Aug 2026, 03:3216,505-2
9 Aug 2026, 04:1116,507-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:0116,511-23
7 Aug 2026, 01:3316,534-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:0316,537no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5916,537first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.77%
avg views ÷ 16,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held13 (22 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total20,889
Reactions total383
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,030
Videos
606
Links
742

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

383 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24363.4%
❤‍🔥7218.8%
🤣4010.4%
👍92.35%
🔥92.35%
😁92.35%
🥰10.261%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 383reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wayofthesamura. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC909 views64 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то эта встреча состоялась! Очень рад провести время с такой большой легендой 😊🔥

54❤‍🔥6👍4

12 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,140 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня произойдёт то, о чём я, если честно, даже не мог особо мечтать. Я болельщик ЦСКА, и я сегодня выйду на поле в воротах за Семью ЦСКА - команду из легенд клуба и звездных болельщиков! Это будет гала-Матч на Кубке Игоря Акинфеева против Сборной России🔥 Безумно счастлив, что у меня появилась возможность хотя бы на один день оказаться по другую сторону, не на трибуне, а на поле, в воротах родных красно-синих цве

25❤‍🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,280 views25 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Выходные проводим с пользой 🤗

23❤‍🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,050 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @primesquadfcPhoto

⚡️PRIME SQUAD vs 2DROTS & АМКАЛ Такие вывески говорят сами за себя: видос с поездки в Екб вышел топовым! 👇 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ

6

3 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,590 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @primesquadfcVideo

PRIME SQUAD 🆚 ДИНАМО ВОЛОГДА Наш первый матч с профессиональным клубом — и сразу тяжелейшая игра. Как прошёл этот выезд, уже можете глянуть на канале 👇 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ

10

3 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,710 views41 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Это была однозначно та поездка, которая останется в сердце. 💔 Всегда здорово выбраться в другой город с друзьями, а когда рядом ещё и ребята из 2D, время провождения становится вдвойне приятнее! Классно провели время, посмеялись, зарядились эмоциями и просто кайфанули от этой атмосферы и поездки. Но самое главное — это вы. Люди, которые пришли на этот праздник, не смотря на не самую лучшую погоду. Спасибо каждому и

36🔥4❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,630 views24 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Приехали в аэропорт, ждем посадку , уже совсем скоро будем в ЕКБ🔥

❤‍🔥193👍2

1 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,300 views16 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @semio_v5Photo

Вот такой бандехой стартуем на турнир в Екб ✈️ всех желающий ждём на трибунах, подробности ТУТ

❤‍🔥151

29 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,200 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @primesquadfcVideo

🔥 ПОЕЗДКА В ДЕРЕВНЮ КОНЮХОВА! На прошлой неделе мы приняли участие в благотворительном турнире Лига Добра и даже выиграли его! А ещё: Стиль и Арчи помылись в доме Конюхова, Кот обманул заправщиков, Сапрон выдал лучший матч в карьере. СМОТРИМ! ПОЛНЫЙ РОЛИК 📺

❤‍🔥9👍2

28 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,910 views37 reactions50 Starsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @primesquadfcVideo

🔆 СЫЧ — MVP ТРЕНИРОВКИ Тащил, что можно и нельзя. Хорош, скромняга! 🙌

34❤‍🔥2🥰1

24 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC≈2,850 views33 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Приехали в Вологду. Даже не успели заселиться, сразу пошли гулять и смотреть город. На самом деле есть в нем что-то свое. Спокойные улицы, мало людей, красивая архитектура. Наверное, один из главных плюсов футбола. Он дает возможность оказаться там, куда в обычной жизни ты, скорее всего, никогда бы не доехал. И каждый такой выезд — это не только матч, но и новые города, впечатления и воспоминания.🔥

25❤‍🔥7👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @wayofthesamura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 466,624 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

2DROTS
@twodrotsshow · 215,548
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Крысева 🐀 | Медиа футбич
@KrysMF23 · 138,976
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Way of the Samurai” (@wayofthesamura), 16,452 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wayofthesamura.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.