Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Третий тайм

@ttimemedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002684580519
TypeChannel
Username@ttimemedia
Description🎙️ Медиафутбол начинается после финального свистка. Всё, что ты не увидишь на поле — здесь. Контент, вайб, конфликты, мемы. Это Третий тайм. #ТретийТайм #Медиафутбол
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 29 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ttimemedia

Growth

87 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:478no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:178first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
64
Videos
55
Links
95

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
45s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
538.5%
323.1%
👎215.4%
👍17.69%
🤝17.69%
🤡17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2025 to 30 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2025, 08:36 UTC130 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Второй день первого тура. Кто?

  1. Альтерон0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2025, 15:02 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Амкал совершенно без игры. Просто отдали инициативу. Плохие пасы, нет понимая. В раздевалке ждём Панов-менталити. Смогут отыграться? Или десятка одержит первую победу над Амкалом? Может пора звонить Парадевичу и Подкользину? Амкал 0 : 1 Десятка ТретийТайм #МедиаФутбол

2

29 Aug 2025, 13:55 UTC118 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Стартует новый сезон! Кто победит?

  1. Амкал62%
  2. ФК 1038%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2025, 16:19 UTC23 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mediaarena1Photo

⚽️🏆 Итоги жеребьёвки пар нижней сетки Кубка Лиги: 📺 «Матч ТВ» – «Народная» ⚽️ 🇧🇾 DMedia – «Анжи» ⚽️ ⚽️ «Эгриси» – Unwanted 🇺🇿 ⚽️ «Титан» – ФК Ars ⚽️ 🥊 Fight Nights – ФК Vibe ⚽️ ⚽️ СКА – Сборная EML ⚽️ 🇰🇿 SD Family – «Альтерон» ⚽️ 😈 Chertanovo – «Апсны» ⚽️ Команды нижней сетки сыграют по два матча в паре: один – на выезде, второй – дома. 🔝 💙 Прямая трансляция Больше новостей 🌐 Сайт 📱 Apple 📱 Android ⚽️ Медиа Ар

9 Aug 2025, 10:38 UTC154 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Первый выпуск шоу 6К Что оценивают? - Оперативный контент - Спортивный контент - Информационно-развлекательный контент - Трансляции - Упоминание в не футбольных СМИ И 4 эксперта не из медиа футбола, смотрят самые яркие моменты и отдают субъективный голос лучшему видео за месяц Апрель: Альфа-Банка +3 балла Лотус +1 балл Как вам результаты первого голосования? Видео: https://vkvideo.ru/video-212508059_456243245

5 Aug 2025, 15:40 UTC31 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fedos911

Смотрю на все это и понимаю: как бы ни закончилось, это лучший кейс в истории Амкала и медиафутбола в целом. Мы вышли далеко за пределы медиафутбола, за пределы проф футбола, пробив многомиллионные аудитории из абсолютно разных сфер (техноблогинг, стриминг, аудитория комиков) и получив огромные охваты в топовых пабликах. Гениально! Ну и в любом случае уже закрыли рты всем, кто называл это неуважением к футболу. Если

5 Aug 2025, 15:14 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @match_mediaVideo

⚡️⚡️⚡️АААААА! ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ! 1:0, «АМКАЛ» ПОВЕЛ! Что за комбинация?! Дальше гол Лимбы? Или Ликса? @match_media

5 Aug 2025, 15:10 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @neclasic0Video

ААААААААААААААА ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ ЗАБИЛ В КУБКЕ РОССИИ @neclasic0

7 Jul 2025, 10:22 UTC139 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Некит из 2D в аду! ТретийТайм #МедиаФутбол

👍1

5 Jul 2025, 20:18 UTC36 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sugarfifaPhoto

🏆 АМКАЛ — ЧЕМПИОН ШЕСТОГО СЕЗОНА MFL @sugarfifa

5 Jul 2025, 19:41 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vlazny1footballPhoto

🫢 Ряба поставил новый рекорд Медиалиги! 14 голевых действий за сезон! Амкал ведет 2:0!

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ttimemedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2025, 08:36 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

Второй день первого тура. Кто?

  1. Альтерон0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2025, 13:55 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Стартует новый сезон! Кто победит?

  1. Амкал62%
  2. ФК 1038%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jun 2025, 16:12 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Какой финал ждём?

  1. Броуки - Амкал62%
  2. Броуки - ФК 1038%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jun 2025, 08:26 UTCAnonymous Poll51 voters

Кто выйдет в финал?

  1. Броуки39%
  2. Синдекат61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2025 to 30 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Третий тайм” (@ttimemedia), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttimemedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.