Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hasan Turdialiyev | Rasmiy kanal

Channel

Hasan Turdialiyev | Rasmiy kanal

@turdialiyevhasan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,913subscribers

+1,150 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001447525293
TypeChannel
Username@turdialiyevhasan
DescriptionSharhlovchi Hasan Turdialiyevning rasmiy kanali: Reklama bo'yicha savollarga 👉 @Sport_Rek Instagram: https://instagram.com/hasan_turdialiyev
Created17 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/turdialiyevhasan

Growth

48,76349,93849,350.56 August 2026 — 48,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,197 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,149 subscribers9 August 2026 — 49,103 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49,044 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,002 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,964 subscribers13 August 2026 — 49,929 subscribers14 August 2026 — 49,938 subscribers16 August 2026 — 49,913 subscribers49,9136 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1,150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,587–50,114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:3949,913-25
14 Aug 2026, 15:3849,938+9
13 Aug 2026, 07:2649,929+965
12 Aug 2026, 04:1448,964-38
11 Aug 2026, 00:4549,002-42
10 Aug 2026, 00:5149,044-59
9 Aug 2026, 01:5049,103-46
8 Aug 2026, 03:2149,149-48
7 Aug 2026, 05:1349,197+434
6 Aug 2026, 01:4648,763no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3348,763first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.4%
avg views ÷ 49,913 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,100
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held56 (24 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total1,799,160
Reactions total21,675
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,920
Videos
1,500
Links
2,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 12s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20,465 reactions across 51 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,86728.7%
👍5,48826.8%
😁3,17115.5%
😢2,75513.5%
🔥1,7688.64%
👎5332.60%
👏4592.24%
😱2161.06%
🤔410.2%
360.176%
🤯310.151%
😡240.117%
🙈210.103%
🤷‍♂210.103%
🥰170.083%
🎉120.059%
🤩50.024%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,675reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 56 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
44
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @turdialiyevhasan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈11,100 views301 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Islam Maxachev Yan Gerriga qarshi jangdan keyin 🌐Telegram 🌐Instagram

162🔥84👍50👏5

15 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC≈15,700 views135 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Antonio Ryudiger. Bolalikdagi og'ir kunlar, oilasi uchun kurash, futboldagi ilk qadamlar va "Real Madrid" himoyasining muhim vakillaridan biriga aylanishigacha bo'lgan yo'l. YouTube kanalimizdagi yangi videoda Antonio Ryudigerning maydondagi agressivligi ortida qanday inson turgani haqida bilib olasiz. 🎙 Kamina Hasan Turdialiyev bilan, Antonio Ryudiger hikoyasi 👇 😎 https://youtu.be/Z8HILFqMBdU 😎 https://youtu.be/Z8

🔥7130👍25👎9

15 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC≈9,460 views263 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @Davron_FayzievPhoto

Афсонавий боксчи Руфат Рисқиев 76 ёшда ҳаётдан кўз юмди. Руфат Рисқиев ўзбек боксчилари орасида биринчи бўлиб, 1974 йилда жаҳон чемпиони унвонига эришган. 1976 йилги Монреаль олимпиадасида кумуш медаль қўлга киритган. Қайсидир маънода ўзбекистонлик боксчиларнинг бўлажак ғалабаларига пойдевор қўйган спортчилардан бири ҳисобланади. Охирги йилларда Рисқиев оғир хасталик билан курашаётган эди. Руфат аканинг яқинларига ҳ

😢217👍2421🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC≈17,100 views237 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Satpayev ijara asosida "Byornli" jamoasiga o'tmoqda. Bu uning o'zi uchun to'g'ri tanlov deb o'ylayman. Ko'proq o'yin amaliyotiga ega bo'lish imkoni bo'ladi. 🌐Telegram 🌐Instagram

👍18633😁17😢1

14 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈19,200 views260 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Enzo "Chelsi"da, Rodri esa "Man.Siti"da qoladiganga o'xshaydi. Londonliklar Enzo uchun belgilangan dedlaynda "shaharliklar"dan taklif olmadi. "Siti" esa "Barselona"ning 65 mln yevrolik taklifiga rad javobini berdi. Kuzatamiz, balki kutilmagan o'zgarishlar bo'lib qolar. 🌐Telegram 🌐Instagram

129😁81👍40😢8🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC≈17,900 views165 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Namanganda gollar shousi. "Navbahor" oxirida g'alabani ilib ketdi va g'alabali seriyasini davom ettirdi. Biroq "Bunyodkor"ga ham oxirigacha kurashganiga qoyil! 🌐Telegram 🌐Instagram

🔥111👍2820👎6

14 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈5,400 views327 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @Nadirkhuja

Футболчининг аламли ҳаёти... Доим ҳам оиланг билан бўлавермайсан. Иссиқ-совуқ пайтларда сафарда бўлишинг мумкин. Навбатдаги турга кетаётганингда эрка ўғлинг кузатгани чиқади: — Менга нима олиб келасиз, ада? — дейди. Йўлдасан... Қўнғироқ... — Ўғлим, ўғлинг омонатини топширди... Қандай ахир, қандай? Тўрт йил аввал қизчасини ўз қўллари билан қабрга қўйгани каммиди? Қандай қилиб яна бундай синов? Ахир ота-онасининг ду

😢28230👍15

14 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈17,700 views202 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

O'tgan mavsum Niderlandiya chempionatining eng zo'r futbolchisi bo'lgan "Ayaks" vakili Mika Godts 55 mln yevro evaziga PSJ tarkibga qo'shilmoqda. Rosti mana shu iqtidorni qaysi top klub olar ekan deb turgan edim. Parijliklar uni o'z safiga qo'shib oladigan bo'ldi. Uning universalligi ayni Enrikening taktikalarida ham ancha as qotsa ajabmas. 🌐Telegram 🌐Instagram

👍15842🥰2

13 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈20,400 views83 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Islom Maxachev o‘z kamarini himoya qilish uchun oktagonga qaytmoqda. Yarim o‘rta vazn toifasidagi chempionlik jangida Machado Gerriga qarshi oktagonga ko‘tariladi. 🥊🥊 UFC 330 janglarni 16-avgust kuni soat 06:00 dan boshlab o’zbek tilida faqat 📺 Setanta Sports 1 telekanalida yoki rus tilida 📺 setantasports.com platformasi orqali tomosha qilishingiz mumkin. 🎙 Asosiy kard janglarini barchasini Davron Fayziev sharhlab

👍4133🔥9

13 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈19,200 views129 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @tolipovorifPhoto

Bu mavsum Elite Ligada ikki vakilimiz ishtirok etadigan boʻlgach, Oʻzbekistonda turnirga qiziqish yuqorilaydi nazarimda. Qoʻshimchasiga Saudiya klublari bilan toʻqnash kelishimiz aniq, ular tarkibidagi yulduzlar ham Fargʻona yoki Toshkentga, balki birdan ikki shahrimizga ham keladi. Qur’a oʻtsin hammasini aniqlab olamiz. Shu qur’a esa 18-avgust kuni oʻtkaziladi.

🔥7829👍16😁5👎1

12 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈117,000 views3,378 reactions44 Starsread 16 August 2026
Video

Messining otasiga maktubuni ovozlashtirdim. Otasizlik dardini his qilgan inson sifatida o’zim ham juda ta’sirlandim. 🌐Telegram 🌐Instagram

2,070😢934👍296🔥27👏22😁13👎122

12 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC≈50,300 views86 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

UEFA Superkubogiga tarkiblar e'lon qilindi. O'ziga xos o'yin bo'ladiganga o'xshamoqda. 🌐Telegram 🌐Instagram

👍6521

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @turdialiyevhasan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 25,809 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Farrukh Ismoilov | VAMOS
@vamosfarrukh · 127,910
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
Setanta Sports O'zbekiston 🇺🇿
@setanta_uzb · 139,081
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
Даврон Файзиев
@Davron_Fayziev · 395,111
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
Xayrulla Hamidov official
@xayrulla_hamidov · 383,699
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
FCB.uz | Rasmiy Kanal
@fcbuz · 100,660
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026
FUTBOL TV | RASMIY
@FUTBOLTV · 269,682
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
ASL FUTBOL (LIVE)
@aslfutbol_asl_futbol_futboltv1 · 290,853
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Championat.asia
@championatasia · 97,385
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
Tribuna.uz
@tribunauznews · 175,526
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hasan Turdialiyev | Rasmiy kanal” (@turdialiyevhasan), 49,913 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turdialiyevhasan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.