🌤 ХАЙРЛИ ТОНГ! Ассалому алайкум! Пайшанба тонги муборак бўлсин. Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият тарк этмасин! ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
❤4👍2😁1

Channel
@HokimBuva_Xokim_Buva
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,387,633subscribers
+45,974 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001480207034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @hokimbuva @HokimBuva_Xokim_Buva |
| Description | 🕵🏻♂️ «ҲОКИМ БУВА»нинг телеграмдаги расмий саҳифаси шу, қолганлари фейк! 🔞 КАТТАЛАР УЧУН! ‼️ Воқеа ёки ҳодисанинг гувоҳи бўлдингизми? Унда бизга юборинг: @hokimbuva_murojaatbot 💰 Реклама: @Xokimbuvareklama |
| Created | 2 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HokimBuva_Xokim_Buva |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
On 2 of the 189 posts we watched over 30days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0022 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /1046196 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC | 30 minutes | 30,300 → 36,300at least +5,900 | 34 → 34at most +1 | +13.2 |
| /10472910 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC | 30 minutes | 18,400 → 23,300at least +4,800 | 26 → 27at most +2 | +10.7 |
Expectedis the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say.It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 13 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 1,387,633 | -1,390 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 1,389,023 | -3,294 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,392,317 | -2,537 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 1,394,854 | -38,916 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 1,433,770 | -1,204 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 1,434,974 | -2,679 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,437,653 | -903 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 1,438,556 | -2,232 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 1,440,788 | -2,654 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 1,443,442 | +39,629 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 1,403,813 | +66,362 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 1,337,451 | -374 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 1,337,825 | -318 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:50 | 1,338,143 | -3,516 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,341,659 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 1,341,659 | first reading |
221 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 221 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,159,810 |
| Reactions total | 31,939 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 96 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 190 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 155of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.3 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 34.5% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 75.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 49,900 views — 3.60% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 59,700).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /10485312 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC | 337 minutes – 1.7 hours old | 7,910 views ~7 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,149 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 57 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /10485212 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC | 1022 minutes – 5.4 hours old | 13,900 views ~25 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,183 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,590still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 85 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /10484912 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC | 1032 minutes – 5.5 hours old | 13,900 views ~34 reactions | 60 minutes: 7,200 → 3.0 hours: 9,260 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 57 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /10484812 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC | 1121 minutes – 5.9 hours old | 15,900 views ~135 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,654 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,300 → 6.0 hours: 15,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 50 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /10484712 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC | 1188 minutes – 7.0 hours old | 22,900 views ~66 reactions | 3.0 hours: 18,600 → 6.0 hours: 20,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 88 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /10484612 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC | 1725 minutes – 9.7 hours old | 37,900 views ~76 reactions | 60 minutes: 16,700 → 3.0 hours: 29,103 interp. → 6.0 hours: 36,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 76 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /10483612 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1734 minutes – 9.8 hours old | 35,400 views ~21 reactions | 60 minutes: 16,317 interp. → 3.0 hours: 28,128 interp. → 6.0 hours: 33,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 68 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /10483512 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC | 189 minutes – 10.0 hours old | 31,400 views ~24 reactions | 60 minutes: 15,080 interp. → 3.0 hours: 24,600 → 6.0 hours: 29,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 65 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
30,268 reactions across 203 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9,001 | 29.7% | |
| 👍 | 7,759 | 25.6% | |
| 😁 | 6,532 | 21.6% | |
| 😡 | 4,197 | 13.9% | |
| 😱 | 2,107 | 6.96% | |
| 🔥 | 572 | 1.89% | |
| ⚡ | 100 | 0.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 221 of the 221 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,939reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 221 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HokimBuva_Xokim_Buva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 221 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌤 ХАЙРЛИ ТОНГ! Ассалому алайкум! Пайшанба тонги муборак бўлсин. Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият тарк этмасин! ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
❤4👍2😁1
💥Бугун 13 август - Халқаро Чапақайлар куни Психологлар чапақайларни кучли характерга эга ижодий одамлар дейдилар. Буни таниқли одамлар - жаҳон сиёсатчилари, ёзувчилар, мусиқачилар, актёрлар ва режиссёрлар мисоллари ҳам тасдиқлайди. 🎊 Барча чап қўл эгаларининг режалари амалга ошишини ва мақсадга эришишда уларга муваффақият ёр бўлишини тилаймиз. ПС/ Ёзувни чап қўлда ёзсангиз ҳам овқатни ўнг қўлда енглар лекин:) ЧАП…
👍15❤9😡1
#Диққат #Тарқатинг Ҳақиқий самовий шоу: бу кеча ўзбекистонликлар 6 та сайёрани ва Персеид юлдузларининг энг юқори чўққисини кўришади, бугун биз ухламаймиз Персеиднинг юлдуз тушиши шу кеча энг юқори чўққисига чиқади. Шарқий йўналишда соатига 100-120 метеорни кўриш мумкин ва максимал 01:00дан 04:56 атрофида кутилмоқда. Тонг отгунча бир вақтнинг ўзида олтита сайёрани кузатиш мумкин бўлади: Нептун 23:30 да, уран 01:00…
👍18❤11😁3😱2
Дўкони борлар ҳушёр бўлинг! Кузатув камерасига тушиб қолган ҳолатни кўринг: сотувчи болакай «шустрый»лик қилмаганида, савдодан тушган пул ўғирлаб кетилиши мумкин эди. Дўкони бор танишларга юбориб, огоҳлантириб қўямиз! ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
😡86❤19😱15👍10😁5
❗️Битта сўз ва 70 млн зарар.... ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
👍42❤12😡10😁2
Сохта долларни аниқлашни 5 та усули! Батафсил видео орқали билиб олинг. Яқинларга ҳам юбориб қўйинг билиб олишсин. ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
❤30👍25😱13😁8
Toshkent ko'chalarida «12» raqamli bannerlarga ko'zingiz tushgan bo'lsa — bu Cambridge o'quv markazining 12 yilligi. • 2014-yil kichkina bir xonada boshlangan yo'l • Ingliz tilini o'rgangan 100,000+ talaba • IELTS'dan 7+ ball olgan 1,000+ o'quvchi • Harvard, Westminster va New York universitetlariga grant bilan kirgan bitiruvchilar • 17 filial. 18-si ochilish arafasida Cambridge o'quv markazida 12 yillik tajriba ga…
❤21
#Диққат ❗Касбий сертификатлаш имтиҳонидан ўта олмаганлар ишлаши мумкин эмасми? Кўпчилик касбий сертификатлаш имтиҳонидан ўта олмаган ўқитувчилар бизга мурожаат қилиб уларга энди ишлаш мумкин эмаслиги айтилаётганини ёзишмоқда. Бу фуқароларнинг Конституциявий ҳуқуқларини бузилиши. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Конституциясининг 42-моддасига асосан Ҳар ким муносиб меҳнат қилиш, касб ва фаолият турини эркин танлаш, хавфсизли…
❤14😁8😱2
#об_ҳаво 🌬 Хафта охиридан Ўзбекистонга салқин ҳаво оқими кириб келади. 16–17 августда Қорақалпоғистон ва Хоразмда ҳаво ҳарорати +30...+35°C гача пасайиши кутилмоқда. 🌡 17 август куни республиканинг бошқа ҳудудларида ҳам ҳарорат жорий ҳафтадагига нисбатан 2–3 даражага пасаяди. ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
👍58❤12😁10😡2
So'rovda qatnashing va 700 000 so'mlik promokodni yutib olish imkoniyatiga ega bo'ling 👉👉👉So'rovdan o'tish!👈👈👈
❤6👍3😡1
#тезкор ❗️Пхукет–Нью-Деҳли рейсида УЧУВЧИ НАША ЧЕКИБ САМОЛЁТНИ БОШҚАРДИ 😳🤦♂️ 4 август куни Пхукетдан Нью-Деҳлига учаётган самолёт турбулентлик ва кескин пастлашга дуч келган. Ҳодиса оқибатида 24 нафар йўловчи жароҳатланган. Самолётнинг ҳар икки учувчиси психоактив моддалар бўйича тестдан ўтказилган. Натижада улардан бирида наркотик модда таъсири аниқланган. ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
😁42❤22😱18😡8
🍉 Тарвузни сиз билмаган фойдалари ҳақида билиб олинг. Яқинларга ҳам юбориб қўйинг. ✅ХОКИМ БУВА - Подписаться.
❤34👍16⚡2😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 221 posts we hold for @HokimBuva_Xokim_Buva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 75,772 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 88 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
13 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ХОКИМ БУВА | Расмий канал” (@HokimBuva_Xokim_Buva), 1,387,633 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HokimBuva_Xokim_Buva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.