Кто мог подумать, что самым успешным нашим представителем в Лиге чемпионов будет женская команда Насаф (она же - Севинч). Четвертьфинал все ближе.
😁9👍4❤1

Channel
@ANikimbaev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,832subscribers
-61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001100760931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ANikimbaev |
| Created | 18 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ANikimbaev |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 09:47 | 5,832 | -21 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:49 | 5,853 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:47 | 5,862 | +21 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:46 | 5,841 | -28 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:17 | 5,869 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 5,883 | -22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 5,905 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 5,916 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 5,933 | -12 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 5,945 | -14 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 5,959 | -24 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 5,983 | -11 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 5,994 | -19 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 6,013 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 6,031 | -20 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 6,051 | -27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 6,078 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 6,090 | +19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 6,071 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 6,086 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 37,348 |
| Reactions total | 566 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,700 reactions across 46 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 669 | 39.4% | |
| 😁 | 436 | 25.6% | |
| ❤ | 213 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 151 | 8.88% | |
| 👎 | 76 | 4.47% | |
| 💯 | 49 | 2.88% | |
| 🤡 | 34 | 2.00% | |
| 😢 | 22 | 1.29% | |
| 😱 | 21 | 1.24% | |
| 🤔 | 20 | 1.18% | |
| 🤬 | 9 | 0.529% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,700 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кто мог подумать, что самым успешным нашим представителем в Лиге чемпионов будет женская команда Насаф (она же - Севинч). Четвертьфинал все ближе.
😁9👍4❤1
Видел у некоторых коллег новость о том, что Дмитрий Сычев приезжал в Ташкент на матч Пахтакора с Аль-Нассром в рамках рекламной акции. Понятно, что спонсоров интересовал потенциальный приезд Криштиану. Но более интересным с точки зрения контента был бы приезд Сычева в Фергану. Его отец, Евгений Сычев, играл за Нефтяник в начале восьмидесятых, и, как рассказывают, именно в Фергане познакомился со своей будущей супру…
👍19🔥13❤2
Сегодня Насаф продолжит свой путь во второй Лиге чемпионов АФК очередным матчем против СК Кувейт. Если клуб из Карши хочет выйти из группы, сегодня нужна только победа.
👎11🔥8👍3❤1
Нашел видео в соцсетях. Не тот ракурс, конечно. Не видно реакции Куньи, но видно, с чего все началось. Каррик отправил Кунью в раздевалку.
👍7😁2❤1
Мы все - немного Маттеус Кунья. 🅰️ Заработал пенальти ⚽️⚽️ Забил два гола 🤿 Переполненный эмоциями снял футболку и нырнул в толпу болельщиков 🟨 Получил за это предупреждение 😱 Сыграл жестко в подкате 🟨🟥 Получил за это второе предупреждение и удаление 😤 Поругался с тренером после матча Не знаю, как долго после матча вы смотрели трансляцию, но BeInSport показал, как Кунья вернулся на поле из тоннеля, праздновал с па…
😁19❤3🔥1
Положение команд после четырех туров Этапа Лиги в зоне Запад Элитной Лиги Чемпионов АФК. Проходной балл в ТОР-8 прямо сейчас - 5 очков. Можно предположить, что после восьми туров проходной балл составит 10 очков. Значит, Нефтчи надо набирать, как минимум, 6 очков в четырех матчах, а Пахтакору нужно восемь. При этом Нефтчи может сетовать на то, что два гола в добавленное время двух последних матчей лишило команду 3 о…
👍11❤1
Opta подсчитала, сколько очков недобрал или перебрал каждый клуб АПЛ.
👍5
Долго ждать не пришлось. Официально: Кубок Азии 2027 состоится с 23 декабря 2027 по 21 января 2028 года.
👎46🤬9👍7❤3
Читатель написал длинный ответ на один из предыдущих постов. Публикую его полностью. Вступать в спор по мелочам не буду. Только напомню, что я написал: - Мне безразлично, кого вы выберете в итоге. Это не моя страна. Но беда в том, что ваш выбор влияет на нашу жизнь. Поэтому, к сожалению, мы вынуждены интересоваться выборами в США. И ещё уточню, что ни в ФИФА, ни в АФК я не работаю. Да, меня привлекают на турниры …
❤6👍4🤔2
Читатель пишет: Первое, что мне пришло в голову это отказ от Шомуродова. Нет, конечно он выдающийся узбекский футболист, но если не будет турнира то на что нацеливать его? Следующий турнир -Олимпиада 2030, потом ЧМ 2032, где ему уже будет 37. Даже если найти возможность играть на азиатском турнире на скорую руку надо уже наигрывать игру без него, не согласны? Не согласен. Именно по Шомуродову не согласен. По двум …
👍37❤3🔥3
По поводу Кубка Азии. Пообщавшись с разными людьми вчера, включая сотрудников АФК, могу сказать: перенос - дело решенное. Вопрос даже не в том, когда об этом объявят официально. Вопрос - когда теперь проводить Кубок Азии. Просто перенести на 12 месяцев не получится. В январе 2028 года уже запланирован Кубок Азии среди 23-летних в Японии. А если в Японии что-то уже запланировано, то менять сроки очень сложно. Кром…
👍17💯4👎2❤1🔥1
И о политике . Сегодня - день выборов. Когда летом 2024 года, во время предвыборной президентской кампании, я оказался в США, на Копа Америка, я сказал своему троюродному брату, который переехал в Штаты по Грин-карте и уже успел стать гражданином США: - Вас больше 300 миллионов, но вы двух нормальных кандидатов в президенты найти не можете. Мне безразлично, кого вы выберете в итоге. Это не моя страна. Но беда в то…
👍32❤5🔥1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @ANikimbaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Согласились бы вы, чтобы спонсором Суперлиги и клубов стали букмекерские конторы, если это поможет им выйти из кризиса?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Футболиум” (@ANikimbaev), 5,832 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANikimbaev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.